Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Jane Wagner | 03/13/2009 7:30 am

Jane Wagner on the Rise, 'Bubble' and Fall in the Art World

Jane Wagner

Now that so many rich people suddenly feel nouveau pauvre, yes, the art world is being affected. I was talking with a gallery owner in New York about the recent art fairs in New York and Miami. There has been a big bubble on exhibit in the art world for some time, and this one wasn’t made by Jeff Koons — or maybe when you think of his prices and other brilliant artists like Murakami, they had a hand in it. When you think of the art market itself, I have sometimes wondered if there wasn’t more creativity in art dealers and gallery owners than in the artists themselves. But the art market will bounce back and maybe one or two new "isms" will emerge, like "relativism." Maybe one or two movements will end, but that, ironically, seems only to strengthen a movement — when you can look back and say that’s the end of that movement — it just seems to solidify its importance.

When I go to galleries or museums now, I see the usual people wandering around wondering what it’s all about. The rich people are there, but with Madoff on their minds as if, perhaps, Madoff made off with their money — or they feel squeamish at the thought — it could have been them!

Things will be normal again, even in the art world. There will always be collectors with OCD compelled to buy, buy, buy, buy, and genuine art lovers. Thank God for the "Art Appreciators." And the good art dealers — all codependents of the artists.

There are no foreclosure signs in the art world — although, this wouldn’t be a bad idea for Ed Ruscha. I can see it now, can’t you?

In the March issue of Art News, there’s an article that may be of interest: "Where Is Art Going."

5 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Kryssi K

Seems to me that, throughout history, the Art industry is what flourishes the most [during/because of] the roughest of times. Makes sense to me - there’s nothing more inspirational than being forced to face the dark side(s) of life, and then persevere. At the very least, those who don’t CREATE are still inspired by works of artists during such despondent times, hence the compulsions to "BUY! BUY! BUY!" and be surrounded by inspiration.

…have I used the word "inspiration" enough in this post, or what?

By Kryssi K on 03/13/2009 12:50 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Jane, I appreciate what you are saying, but it does drive me nuts that there isn’t more support for women in the arts.  As usual, we’re supposed to wait with hat in hand.  I’d love the day when you finally take your art as seriously as you do the male painters you’ve known.  That would be a miracle.
By Mugsy Peabody on 03/13/2009 4:46 pm
Helen O'Reilly

Isn’t "bubble" a great word? The South Sea Bubble was a very bad thing, but what an evocative term!

My dog is named Bubble. Just one bubble.

By Helen O'Reilly on 03/24/2009 4:38 pm
macwoof woof

The art world changed in the ‘80’s when the artist became the new celebrity; the art magazines had pictures of the artists on the cover, not the art. When I was in graduate school the students talked more about who was at such and such gallery and how much their work was selling for. They didn’t talk about the work itself. 

Art became more of an intellectual exercise speaking to those who knew the language than stuff mined from the heart or soul. In the end the real artists will continue to make art because they have to. This isn’t to say that there aren’t ‘real’ artists out there who are making money and who are successful. It doesn’t seem fair that people who love art can’t afford to buy it, or that artists who are good can’t afford to make it. 

By macwoof woof on 03/30/2009 11:49 pm
Little Fefe ~ There is nothing wrong with being too idealistic. It is just your dreams sparkling.

It doesn’t seem fair that people who love art can’t afford to buy it, or that artists who are good can’t afford to make it. 

Thank you! You took the words right from my mouth. Before even reading your comment I was thinking along the similar how exclusive and closed off the Art World continues to be. Most of us ‘art lovers’ will never be able to afford art piece (that’s if we still want to have shelter and food for the rest of the year) or even set foot in a gallery. I have always felt very conflicted about the art world — it is deeply moving yet possibly one of the most socially and financially unaccessible realms especially for women! Not only is there starving artists but there’s also starving admirers. It is more about fame and prestige than actual focus on the natural beauty captured in an artistic creation  - but I guess I have it all backwards, why would it be any different since we in live that seems to value worth from those characteristics before anything else or anyone.

This is exactly why we are in the mess that we are in the first place because of buy, buy, buy.

 Just sayin’