Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Money | 08/04/2009 9:50 am

Financial Analyst Jean Chatzky Dissects the Financial Woes of Annie Leibovitz

Jean explains why some extraordinary creative types find it difficult to balance checkbooks and pay bills.
By Jean Chatzky

Editor’s note: An award-winning journalist, author and motivational speaker, Jean Chatzky needs no introduction. As a financial editor for NBC’s "Today Show," Chatzky offers savvy advice on managing money and wealth. Her latest book, The Difference, provides simple strategies for a prosperous financial future. Visit her blog at JeanChatzky.com.

I’m sure you’ve read this news. Over the past weekend it was everywhere including in the Style section of The New York Times. Annie Leibovitz, photographer extraordinaire, she of the naked John and Yoko shot, of the pregnant Demi Moore shot, is in rough financial waters.

Why does this interest me? So many celebs of late have hit the financial skids — Lindsay Lohan, Lenny Dykstra, Stephen Baldwin — it reminds me of a finding in The Difference. When I looked at factors that held people back from financial success, stubbornness was one. That is not difficult to understand. If stubbornness defines you, then you’re not likely to conform to whatever task the man (or woman or corporation) asks you to take on.

The other, however, was more surprising, and it seems to apply in this case: creativity. People who defined themselves as completely creative — not just very creative, or somewhat creative — but completely creative, were not likely to attain great wealth. Why is that?

David T. Robinson, finance scholar at Duke University, and I mulled the research, and here’s where we came out. Sometimes very creative people seem to feel they are above all that; above all the minutia of bill paying and record keeping; above the tedious tasks like checkbook balancing that are necessary to get through life with one’s credit score intact. They — not all but some of them — think they should be given a free pass as if they’ve given their art to the world and the world should be grateful and not bug them about the little things.

We’ve all known people like this — creative types, who don’t get as far in life as perhaps we thought they would because they won’t deign to do the dues — paying and sucking up — that the rest of us did in our 20s and 30s. I’m not suggesting Annie (or Lindsay or any of the other truly talented individuals on the list of the financially fallen) do that. I’m merely suggesting they recognize that getting by financially is an item on the checklist of life in this day and age. And if they want to be able to continue to create, it might be a good idea to hire someone to handle the mundanity of it all.

Personally, I know a few people who would jump at that kind of a job.

31 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Alesia Kaye

 

Wow - is this a really strong and seemingly opinionated statement.  As an artist and photographer myself I was so shocked that I was left gasping as I read this post.

 

Perhaps those who don’t see themselves as "completely creative" don’t understand what it takes to be such a person.  The need to be creative never leaves such a person - every waking moment of every day, and often even those moments in time when we are not awake, the creativity is there.  I can hardly pass by a person and not think whether or not I would like to photograph them and if so in what manner.  I notice textures of buildings, plants and the lighting of an area when I’m not even attempting to.  The process is always there and I am a bit of a slave to the thoughts - they control me, I do not control them.  To not express this creativity - whether for profit or pleasure - is not a choice, it is a necessity.  I could really care less whether you or any other person enjoys what I create - I create because I have no other choice.  It is as essential to my being as is breathing or communicating in any other form.

 

Because of this overwhelming part of my nature it can be "difficult" to focus on non-creative issues in life, but not impossible.  I would never avoid dealing with them intentionally, I have never thought nor known any other creative-type personality who thought that because we create art that the world "owed us something".  Each of us knows that if we are fortunate enough to earn a living off of our creativity we are indeed lucky and many of us fear nothing more than having to have what so many call "a real job" … we do not look down on others for having such things as "real jobs", but instead often harbor a fear that they are stronger than us as they are offering a worthwhile "skill" as many in society would judge.

 

To say that because one is creative means that the person feels entitled to not have to deal with mundane issues of life is a cruel statement.  I’ve never known any creative person to know such a thing.  Many struggle with the knowledge or ability to focus long enough to accomplish these mundane tasks, but don’t feel they are above them.  Indeed many fear that their inability to focus on them could be the downfall of their business or other areas of their life and end up hiring others to watch these matters for them because of this fear.

 

I myself end up focusing more on these mundane issues than I care to - double & triple checking invoices, daily logs of hours worked, balancing accounts, etc because I fear I will forget whether or not they’ve been dealt with because I’ve "zoned out" during a project and allowed myself to turn completely over to the creative side.

 

Your statement of thinking that a "completely creative" person feels themselves to "think they should be given a free pass as if they’ve given their art to the world and the world should be grateful and not bug them about the little things" smacks of envy.  It sounds to at least this creative type as a person who does not understand nor appreciate the work that goes into accomplishing a creative task and thinks these type of people are "getting off easy" as compared to the rest.  

 

Just because dealing with financial issues is easy and understandable to you, and others like you, does not mean it is the same for anyone else - creative or not.  This statement sounds as if you are demeaning a creative person because you finally found something you are better at then they are - it sounds desperate.

 

Personally, I know a few people who would jump at that kind of a ability - the ability to understand the complex world of finance and accounting.  And not all of them are creative types - just regular ordinary people who occasionally bounce a check or are in credit card debt up to their eyeballs.

 

By Alesia Kaye on 08/04/2009 10:27 am
O E
Very good response, Alesia.  Financial types don’t seem to understand the unpredictability of the creative life.  They’re are focused on the facts, the figures, the certain conclusion to a project, while artists give themselves to emotion and inspiration. Leibovitz has navigated a rough sea of emotion in recent years, which may have influenced her ability to deal efficiently with the business end of her profession.  She’s lost the people closest to her, her loved ones.  I see this media attention to her financial problems as cruel and insensitive.  It is time for those who have benefited from her work, the wealthy subjects of her photographs, to show appreciation for her art and her respect for them, and come to her rescue.  Perhaps Leibovitz’ emotional rollercoaster plunged her into a deep depression, who knows? But regardless of the reasons, a little compassion and respect for her privacy are called for. 
By O E on 08/04/2009 12:49 pm
Alesia Kaye

I agree.  

Annie is a great inspiration to me and my heart aches for what she has been through in recent years.  Now to see her being used to analyze the behavior of all creative types - irritates me to no end. As you mention, she could easily be suffering from some form of depression, not that it’s any of our business, but who wouldn’t in this situation?  Even the most analytical of us would suffer from it for at least a while with the events she has lived.  Can’t somebody give her a break….  

I just hate to see her situation used as an attack on a whole group of people - I can’t stand blanket statements or assumptions to begin with and to use one person’s situation as an excuse to issue forth such a blanket statement is reprehensible at best, and with the emotional events that have taken place it goes on to being just plain cruel.  People need to know when to back-off.  

Each of us can learn something from the suffering of others - that’s how life goes - but it doesn’t mean we have to inflict more pain on them with the lesson.

By Alesia Kaye on 08/04/2009 2:52 pm
Pamela R.
So true- she is just jealous!!!! I’d like to see her paint a picture!
By Pamela R. on 08/07/2009 2:47 am
NJ Guy
This is where her last sentence of the last full paragraph applies.  Simply hire someone to do what you cannot do without compromising your creativity.  Problem solved.
By NJ Guy on 08/07/2009 9:59 am
Christine Cline
There’s another answer. Before 1 was adopted my poss1ble mother had my 1Q tested.  1 scored 142. And  1 was only 3. She adopted me expect1ng me to grow up to be a r1ch and famous bus1ness woman. 1 am 1nstead a starvng art1st. L1terally! When 1t comes to art, photography and poetry my mnd 1s amazng. When 1t comes to bus1ness 1 have the 1Q of a br1ck wall. Try as 1 mght 1 can not even beg1n to fgure out how to get my amazng art beyond my front door. 1 also can not begn to fgure out how to advocate for myself. After 20 years searchng ths town and 2 on the net all 1 have found 1s people w1llng to rele1ve my bank account of the meager SS1 and my granddaughter’s Welfare. 22 years and all 1 could f1nd 1s people to put me down, call me names and steal from me. So you see our mnds just work completely dfferently. Now 1f only 1 could th1nk how to get help or some k1nd of sponsorsh1p. That would be a wonderful 1Q.
By Christine Cline on 08/04/2009 10:33 am
Steve Cowan
Ms Liebovitz’ current financial situation has more to do with her tax problems relating to her inheriting from her gay partner, and the lack of protection extended to gays.  If/when a husband/wife passes on, taxes don’t apply since the "death tax" was eliminated for them.  But if/when a gay partner dies, the inheritance is taxed as a gift, at very high rates.  Another discrimination against gays and unmarried couples!
By Steve Cowan on 08/04/2009 11:13 am
Lily Rose

My friend Steve, I appreciate your relevant comment to this issue, and join you in pointing out that "creative types" often do very well with their money when playing on a level field.

Namaste.

By Lily Rose on 08/04/2009 5:59 pm
Susan Crawford

This story - the Liebovitz financial predicament - and Jean Chatzky’s take on it have both come at a critical time in my life. Like Liebovitz and like Alesia, I think of myself first and foremost as an artist. Money and financial matters? Not so much. Am I stubborn when it comes to following the rules and doing the due diligence about taking care of business? Yes, I am, and I’m almost frantic to uncover the source of that stubbornness and try to deal with it. For a while, things were good. Then came the dental nightmare - tens of thousands of dollars of debt had to be incurred to repair and restore my mouth after years of botched dentistry. It wasn’t a question of choice or of cosmetics - it was a question of overall health.

And the bottom fell out, since this catastrophe coincided with my retirement and reduced income. Bankruptcy now looms ever nearer. I reached a point where a trip to my mailbox was so fraught with fear and anxiety that I stopped going! (Stubborn? Or just frightened to death of what fresh hell awaited? Both, most likely.)

I would give a great deal to learn how to balance my life better - never mind my checkbook. I won’t say I can affix blame for my current financial woes on my artistic temperament - I think that is too easy although I believe it is a contributing factor. The stubbornness is even more significant, I think. Add to that - in my case - an ocean of anger and resentment at being victimized by a combination of bad dental care, an insurance system that is light years away from providing consumers with adequate dental coverage, and the fact that legal redress is not an option because (a) I am not dead, dying or permanently disfigured and (b) the amount of money involved is "too small" to be worth it for any of the dozens of personal injury and dental malpractice folks I have spoken to. Sigh. Maybe to them - but it is an amount that is going to bring me down hard.

But this is an exceptional situation. Even had this NOT happened, I would say that I am one of those who has never been able to handle money well. Bill paying is a source of huge tension for me, and has been all my life. Frankly, money matters scare the hell out of me, and make me feel useless and stupid - yet more reasons to ignore them in my warped thinking. I would rather be writing or researching than dealing with the practicality - no, the NECESSITY - of managing my finances in a timely and adult manner.

Oh, boy. What a rant this has become. Sorry, wowsers. But in a strange way, this is also a real breakthrough for me, because I am actually talking about a part of my character that I see as so deeply flawed and shameful that I tend to stuff it down deep and hide it from all eyes. Now it is out there, and for better or worse, I need to deal with it. My situation is nowhere near as dire as Ms. Liebovitz’s, and my heart breaks that this amazing photographer stands to lose so much. But if there’s a lesson here - and there always is! - I guess it is to conquer your foolish pride and stubbornness and face what must be faced. I hope through counseling and therapy I can emerge from my messy situation stronger and more devoted to managing my finances as well as I manage my art and creativity.

 

By Susan Crawford on 08/04/2009 2:24 pm
O E
I do hope you emerge in good shape too, Susan, with respect to health and finances.  I’m also a writer and dealing with the business end of it is no party; but I remind myself that those who provide for my physical needs have their own to meet.  I remind myself that bills incurred need to be paid, because someone else depends on that to live.  Being a creative person does not exclude one from facing responsibility, as much as we would like it to be that way.  That said, I believe the media voltures will find it hard to let go of Leibovitz’ current predicament and continue to twist the knife of contempt they so easily unshield for those who achieve success.  She is the only who knows how and why things got the way they are.  Speculation at this point by those who don’t know her, is vicious and unproductive.
By O E on 08/04/2009 3:46 pm
Susan Crawford
Thank you, OE. I do appreciate your kind thoughts. I am fortunate to have found a great team of dentists, the surgeries have gone well, and there is light at the end of the tunnel. We’ve worked out a payment plan, but so much was eroded that I’m overwhelmed. However, I’m grateful to be able to finally admit to my poor financial skills. That’s the first step in trying to dig out. I also agree that the media has intruded terribly on Liebovitz at a time when privacy and a measure of peace would be welcome as she tries to sort through her options. I wish her well, and hope she does not lose control over her body of work and her artistic freedom as a trade-off for getting out of this debt.
By Susan Crawford on 08/04/2009 3:58 pm
Washington  Cube
I view this as a blanket statement, as well.  For every creative person not attuned to checks and balances, there are more that are.  The actress putting on her horn rims poring over points on a contract.  Salvador Dali where every penny was a pound. I agree that it’s not fair to single Ms. Leibovitz out as I think her circumstances are different and have other sources. Paris Hilton making sure her teacup dogs never wear the same outfit…well…that’s another story.
By Washington Cube on 08/04/2009 3:45 pm
Bella Mia

Ned Hermann wrote a book called, "The Creative Brain."  In it he describe "thinking preferences" It turns out that different professions have different thinking preferences. People can be dominate in one of the 4 quadrants like A: left brain cerebral, which is highly analytic like certain types of engineers, or B: Left brain, limbic, which is highly sequential, like accountants and medical secretaries.  Then there’s C quadrant: Right brain limbic, which is  like nurses, elementary school teachers, and even pediatricians, and then D quadrant is right brain cerebral, and you have inventors, philosophers, architects.

I love the graphic in the book that plots out the "thinking preferences" of great people in history.  I’ll see if I can find a link.

 The idea is to recognize your thinking preference, there is also a test that can be performed, and then focus on something that plays to your strengths.  Some people are "Whole brained" and can relate to many of the people in all the quaddrants.  CEO’s tend to be whole brained thinkers. They discovered these pattrern after testing tens of thousands of people.

The other idea is to find people that compliment your weaknesses with their strengths. People who marry tend to have opposite profiles.  People who just move in together tend to have similar profiles. My profile is A-D: I’m very cerebral, and an analytical and abstract thinker.  I love reading philosophy books (D), and murder mysteries (A).      

By Bella Mia on 08/05/2009 1:36 am
Christine Cline

Thanks for wr1tng th1s Bella. 1 wrote someth1ng s1m1l1ar earl1er; however, you wrote from a sc1ent1f1c, fact based perspect1ve wh1le 1 wrote from personal exper1enced. A h1gh 1Q and surv1val have led to a more all over use of my bra1n; yet, 1 am predom1nately r1ght bra1ned. Some people just do not get that. They bele1ve that 1 and others l1ke me are just be1ng lazy (though some probably are). Bes1des 1f everyone had full use of the1r bra1ns then would there really be any such th1ng as talent? Probably not. Nor would there be much use for team work e1ther other than sheer brute labor. We could just about go through l1fe one person at a tme. Where’s the fun 1n that? 1 rather l1ke helpng out others when 1 can. And 1 love (someday) to bless people w1th my art, photography and poetry.

1 too am A-D. Thankfully so 1s my youngest daughter and my son. 1 do not see them much; but, we talk on the phone somet1mes. They are my only A-D frends (then aga1n 1 have no fr1ends outs1de my fam1ly, wh1ch does not go past me.) 1 th1nk th1s "th1nk1ng preference" may expla1n why many now famous art1sts were so poor 1n the1r t1me and why some l1ke me 1n th1s age are unable to get the1r careers go1ng at all. Though 1 go not th1nk we have a cho1ce 1n th1s "preference". Because 1f 1 d1d 1 would not be s1tt1ng here r1ght now hungry and unable to eat. My granddaughter would not be startng the school year wth only one par of shoes (not gym shoes) and no school clothes at all. And th1s would NOT be my 32nd year 1n a row w1thout a vacat1on! And my laptop (do not have room for a desk top) would be able to pr1nt the 9th lalphabet letter, LOL. Blessngs to you, my dear. Enjoy that A-D bra1n!

 

By Christine Cline on 08/05/2009 8:57 am
kermie b

In an economic downturn, purchasing art dies out long before buying groceries and daily necessities. 

I have a wonderful friend, an accomplished artist, whose CV is six pages long in 5 point type.  She has so many awards to her name she cannot name them all.  Before this recession, she was doing very well, painting portraits of local celebrities and doing her own marvelous paintings.  All the while she worked at my office, where I worked full time, one or two days a week.  Then she started to pick up more and more hours whenever someone was out.  Finally, she was laid off along with the rest of us. 

To say she was not cognizant of paying her bills because she is vastly creative is insulting.  She is almost 80 years old, and knocks herself out to balance both worlds.   

By kermie b on 08/05/2009 10:43 am