Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Juliet Buck | 04/03/2009 11:00 am

Joan Juliet Buck: Who Does Bernard Madoff Remind You Of?

© AP

I have been wondering who Bernard Madoff reminds me of. Because, for all his evil deeds, there was something weirdly attractive and reassuring about his demeanor.

I wondered what it was. The flyaway gray hair, the tight line of the mouth — who did he look like? What was this strange, almost historic elegance? Why did his face — dear God! — reassure me? Why did the face of this criminal stranger look so intensely familiar, as if I had seen it every single day?

Oh my God …

2009_0403_ap_madoff_wiki_dollar.jpg
Madoff/Dollar Bill © AP/Wikipedia

107 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Denise Newell
Every time I see him I think of the Joker on the Batman series from when I was a kid in the ’60s and ’70s. I don’t remember exactly when it was on!
By Denise Newell on 04/03/2009 5:06 pm
JJ GB

If the boot camp haircuts are still given to prison inmates (or do they do that anymore?), he wont look like George much longer.

By JJ GB on 04/03/2009 6:07 pm
Brittany Swain

I am wondering why no one has taken the obvious jab, Madoff pronounced "Made-off" as in he made-off with all our money. Not one media type has exploited this!!! I’m just sayin’

Brittany S., Beech Mountain, NC

By Brittany Swain on 04/03/2009 8:26 pm
Jan Becker
The difference between Shylock and Madoff (among others) is that Shylock was greedy in his dealings with gentiles. Madoff stole from everyone, but used his position within the Jewish community to prey on fellow Jews. His religion, Shylock’s religion, that’s really irrevelant. A crook is a crook is a crook.
By Jan Becker on 04/03/2009 9:37 pm
Sam Mirando

Shylock was not a crook.  He made a contract with Antonio and loaned Antonio money:

In "The Merchant of Venice," Shylock is a Jewish moneylender who lends money to Antonio, setting the bond at a pound of Antonio’s flesh. When a bankrupt Antonio defaults on the loan, Shylock demands the pound of flesh, as revenge for Antonio having previously insulted and spat on him.

You are right that religion is irrelevant but you are wrong to suggest that Shylock was a crook.  

By Sam Mirando on 04/04/2009 7:22 pm
Susan G

The Madoff/Jewish discussion makes me squirm because it’s never  mentioned if a crook is a Lutheran, Presbyterian, Baptist….

We never heard where  Allen Stanford prayed, for instance.

By Susan G on 04/03/2009 10:04 pm
Bella Stander
Shylock has become a term for a disreputable JEWISH business person. The analogy is way too obvious—and thus too loaded. I know you’re Jewish, which is why I found your comment so disturbing.
By Bella Stander on 04/03/2009 11:17 pm
Sam Mirando
And Margo seems to have forgotten that Shylock and Antonio made a contract when Shylock lent Antonio money.  The play involves Shylock trying to enforce the contract, which nobody forced Antonio to make with him.  Shylock was not a crook and a thief.  Madoff is both!
By Sam Mirando on 04/04/2009 7:24 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe

I’m missing something here. Who the heck is Margo? And of course Shylock was neither a crook or a thief! His great fault, however, was that his concern for the loss of his ducats seemed greater than the loss of his daughter. 

By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 04/05/2009 9:08 am
katywon LA..

I’m not Jewish but some of my family are and I agree Bella. Margo you should rethink your statement. Otherwise I agree with you totally that Madoff is despicable and I am glad I am not one of his investors. Not very likely either since members had to be honored with a personal invitation.

The comparison to Washington in looks yes, but thats stretching it. 

 

By katywon LA.. on 04/03/2009 11:37 pm
Chris Broersma
He may look like George, but he hasn’t the lack of character is where they differ.
By Chris Broersma on 04/03/2009 11:41 pm
caren gittleman
The fact that he is Jewish is completely irrelevant, haven’t we gotten past that?
By caren gittleman on 04/04/2009 6:09 am
Vi Anderson
Yes.  Take the glasses off and pose him the same as Washington on the dollar bill.  Actually, he reminds me of my father at that same age, so maybe it’s a subliminal reaction to that fatherly look.  Maybe that’s how he conned so many people.  I would point out that, with respect to his jewishness, that it is a poor idea to trust someone because he has the same religion as yourself (which may be why so many of his victims were Jewish charities) or because he reminds you of your father (or George Washington).  I know there are lots of Christians who are convinced that other Christians are more trustworthy than those of faiths different from their own.  There are hypocritical con artists within all faiths.   
By Vi Anderson on 04/04/2009 1:47 pm
Washington  Cube

Oddly, it’s not his thievery that interests me the most about his character.  It’s what he did to alleged "friends," even until the last moments of exposure and arrest.  Words like "pathological," and "sociopath," come to mind, and don’t mistake those words to mean "serial killer."  It involves missing parts of character like "the ability to feel emotion," "empathy," but also to perhaps possess personality traits most of us wouldn’t want landed on our brow: being evaluated a "Narcissistic  Sadist."   Endulge me in my posting this.  I found it on Goggle by the search query: "narcissistic sadist."  It is a diagnostic evaluation.  You can get back many, many articles on this, all more or less using the exact same language, which is a diagnosis:

The narcissist simply discards people when he becomes convinced that they can no longer provide him with narcissistic needs. This is an evaluation, subjective and highly emotionally charged. It does not have to be grounded in reality. Suddenly - because of boredom, disagreement, disillusion, a fight, an act, inaction, or a mood - the narcissist wildly swings from idealization to devaluation. He then "disconnects" immediately. He needs all the energy that he can muster to obtain new Sources of Narcissistic Supply and would rather not spend these scarce and expensive resources over what he regards as human refuse, the waste left by the process of extraction of Narcissistic Supply.That the victims of his sadism are still his only or major sources of Narcissistic supply, but are perceived by him to be intentionally frustrating and withholding it. Sadistic acts are his way of punishing them for not being docile, obedient, admiring and adoring as he expects them to be in view of his uniqueness, cosmic significance and special entitlement.The narcissist is not a sadist or a paranoiac, per se. He does not enjoy the application of pain to his victims. He does not believe firmly that he is the focal point of persecution and the target of conspiracy. But he does enjoy punishing himself - it provides him with a sense of relief, exoneration and validation. In this restricted sense he is a masochist. Because of his lack of empathy and his rigid personality he often inflicts great (physical or mental) pain on meaningful others in his life - and he enjoys their writhing and suffering. In this restricted sense he is a sadist. The narcissist is an artist of pain as much as any sadist. The difference is motivation.   The narcissist tortures and abuses as a means to punish and to reassert superiority and grandiosity. The sadist does so for pure enjoyment. But both are adept at finding the chinks in people’s armors. Both are ruthless and venomous in the pursuit of their prey. Both are unable to empathize with their victims, being, self-centered, and rigid.He acts the guru to her need of guidance, the avuncular or father figure, the teacher, the only true friend, the old and the experienced. All this in order to weaken defenses and to lay siege. So subtle and poisonous is the narcissistic variant of sadism that it might well be regarded as the most dangerous of all.Luckily, the narcissist’s attention span is short and his resources and energy limited. In constant, effort consuming and attention diverting pursuit of Narcissistic Supply, the narcissist lets his victim go, usually before an irreversible damage occurs. (I would add, or get caught.)  The victim is then free to rebuild their life from ruins. The sadistic narcissist perceives himself as Godlike, ruthless and devoid of scruples, capricious and unfathomable, emotion-less and non-sexual, omniscient, omnipotent and omni-present, a plague, devastation, an inescapable verdict.  He nurtures his ill-repute, stoking it and fanning the flames of gossip. It is an enduring asset. Hate and fear are sure generators of attention. It is all about narcissistic supply, of course - the drug which narcissists consume and which consumes them in return.Deep inside, it is the horrid future and inescapable punishment that await the narcissist that are irresistibly appealing. Sadists are often also masochists. In sadistic narcissists, there is, actually, a burning desire - nay, NEED - to be punished. In the grotesque mind of the narcissist, his punishment is equally his vindication. By being permanently on trial, the narcissist claims the high moral ground and the position of the martyr: misunderstood, discriminated against, unjustly roughed, outcast due to his very towering genius or other outstanding qualities. To conform to the cultural stereotype of the "tormented artist" - the narcissist provokes his own suffering. He is thus validated. His grandiose fantasies acquire a modicum of substance. "If I were not so special - they wouldn’t have persecuted me so". The persecution of the narcissist IS his uniqueness. He must be different, for better or worse. The streak of paranoia embedded in him, makes this outcome inevitable. The Narcissist is in constant conflict with lesser beings: his spouse, his shrink, his boss, and his colleagues. Forced to stoop to their intellectual level, the narcissist feels like Gulliver: a giant strapped by Lilliputians. His life is a constant struggle against the self-contented mediocrity of his surroundings. This is his fate which he accepts, though never stoically. It is a calling, a mission and a recurrence in his stormy life.

This was quite a lot to dump out, and even then, I edited out a lot of the study. Sound like anyone you’ve ever known or heard about?  There was a good reporting about Madoff in the recent issue of Vanity Fair.  One recurring theme kept popping up.  The need of his friends to be let into the exclusive "club" of his earning genius, and since he only allowed "friends," in: also being considered a friend (and all that it encompassed.) One individual negatively affected by this man said, "He did these things to me, knowing he was about to be charged. How could he?" How, indeed.

 

 

By Washington Cube on 04/04/2009 5:46 pm
Flora Dora

Margo, I was stunned with your remarks about Shylock. Obviously, you are not antisemitic, but Shakespeare might have been. He never met a Jew, but used the stereotype of the "pound of flesh." When my late mother was in high school in 1925, the city of Buffalo,N.Y. chose the "Merchant of Venice" as the one required Shakespeare play. Buffalo had one of the largest Polish populations in the world. Historically, the Poles were known for blatant antisemitism. The teacher, who had to teach the play, apologized to my mother and suggested she leave early when she was teaching the play because every year the Jewish children in the class were beaten up afterwards. Jump to 1965 and I am student teaching in a white suburb of Buffalo(Kenmore, N.Y.) and told I had to teach "The Merchant of Venice." I went to the principal and said I refused; there were many other excellent Shakespearean plays to chose from. He said:"You Jews are too sensitive, teach it or I fail you." Then he made a big mistake:" He said:"And don’t use your Jewish money to get you out of this." I didn’t have any money, but I called prominent members of the Jewish community and told them my experience. After that, "Romeo and Juliet" was the play taught, and I got an A in student teaching. Shylock is still synonomous with evil money lenders.

By Flora Dora on 04/04/2009 7:42 pm