Wall Street Weekly | 03/27/2009 12:45 pm
Liz Peek Asks: Is the Rally For Real?

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 3/23)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Is the rally for real? Or, as your kids might say, are we there yet? The stock market has rebounded 21% from the lows hit on March 9, with financials leading the surge. The bounce has been fueled by some actual, good economic news and by a slew of policy initiatives coming out of Washington that have been deemed 1) not as bad as they might have been, 2) possibly helpful or 3) unlikely to survive – depending on who is voting.Important to sentiment this week has been the rollout of Treasury Secretary Geithner’s public-private partnership designed to buy the banks’ toxic assets. The plan is still unfettered with details, but its proposal reassured many investors that, as distasteful as it is, the administration will have to work with Wall Street. Since the president has repeatedly slammed our financial industry leaders, this reality check gave bank stocks a pop. So – yes – I think the rally has substance. But – no – we are not there yet. Let me explain.
| While undoubtedly positive in the short run, the ultimate impact of the administration’s policies is not so clear. |
I’ve mentioned many times in this column that the housing sector has to recover before the economy and the banks can find firm footing. Of late, there have been indications that the industry may be hitting bottom. The latest readings show sales of existing homes up 5% in February from the prior month, while new home sales rose 4.7%. A 27% drop in prices on newly built houses (from their peak) surely helped fuel the increase, as did somewhat freer credit and record-low mortgage rates. Mortgage applications over the past week were up 32%. Importantly, inventories of new homes are off 42% from their peak in 2006. This is all good news.
Positive signs elsewhere include a surprising 3.4% jump in durable goods orders in February, which included a 13% hike in future purchases of heavy machinery. In addition, better-than-expected retail sales and a tick up in consumer spending, which is being reported as I write this, come on the heels of an above-consensus bounce in January’s outlays.
These unexpectedly positive signs point to a recession that at the least is not getting worse; in fact, it looks like the downward momentum may have eased. While the current quarter will likely post a GDP drop of 4% - 5% (but better than the fourth quarter’s 6.3%), some forecasters are now calling for modest gains by the fourth quarter. This is quite positive, and can presumably be traced to the dramatic increase in the money supply (up around 18% over the past six months) and somewhat looser credit markets. The Federal Reserve and the Treasury have literally pulled out all stops over the past nine months to inflate the country’s balance sheet, and the process is having the desired effect.
While undoubtedly positive in the short run, the ultimate impact of the administration’s policies is not so clear. Inflated spending may weaken the dollar – a process which is already underway – and may put us at odds with our trading partners. The head of China’s central bank caused a ruckus earlier this week by suggesting the creation of a new international currency reserve to replace the dollar. I don’t for a minute believe this was a genuine wish, but rather saw it as a warning shot over our bow. One of Geithner’s first comments on taking office was to rebuke China for keeping their currency artificially low — an accusation I thought preposterous at the time. In part, I view this latest Chinese troublemaking as payback. Not only has the low yuan contributed to an extended price break on imports for U.S. consumers, it is also impossible to imagine that the Chinese will purposefully trash their $1-plus trillion in U.S. Treasury holdings by revaluing their currency higher. Note to Mr. Geithner: At the moment we need the Chinese to keep buying our ever-escalating sales of bonds.























69 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I think this is a dead cat bounce, as they call it. The average consumer does not have money. Our 401K’s have been depleted, but Obama is hoping we will borrow more money instead of replenishing our savings. Looks like we won’t be getting the promised tax cut - which was predicted.
Therefore, people feel poorer, therefore are spending less, but the government is promising to take more money from us in taxes, so they can lend more money to the banks, who are supposed to lend us back the money and charge us interest on our own tax money.
I think many people have been sitting on the sidelines when real estate was too expensive so now see an opportunity - but businesses are also looking at the frightening chart put out yesterday in the Washington Post that show the exploding deficit and know that taxes are going Up, Up, Up, not to mention "that energy prices will necessarily skyrocket" as Obama has said, under his plan.
Graph showing the Bankrupting of America and Federal Deficits.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/03/21/GR200903…
(I can’t get the link button on the toolbar to work. When I highlight the text and click on the link icon it bring up a blank white square, nothing more.)
Oh yikes, Bella, but thank you for supplying the graphic. Things are not looking good and gas is already starting to creep back up again.
I think people are nervous about making significant purchases and the security of their jobs as well.
Bella: that taxes are going Up, Up, Up, not to mention "that energy prices will necessarily skyrocket" as Obama has said, under his plan.
Increased taxes is what’s going to bring the whole thing to a grinding halt. At the present time, 90% of the people who want to work have a job. In my neck of the woods, people are spending — they are buying new cars, new homes are being built. The economy is not as robust as it was last year at this time, but purchasing is happening. Now, when we all get hit with increased taxes to pay for Obama’s dreams, I think the story will change.
Americans talk a good game about the need for balanced budgets and fiscal responsibility, but we’ve proved ourselves happy to borrow trillions in order to maintain our life styles. Increased taxes to pay for Obama’s dreams? DREAMS? May I remind you that Reagan and Bush 1 (even after he said, read my lips) had to raise taxes because we were tanking. But Bush 2 never did. The first president ever in the face of a war who did not raise taxes. Too bad citizens have to pay for the life they expect their country to give them. However, I’m not clear what taxes you are referring to at this time?
phyllis: However, I’m not clear what taxes you are referring to at this time?
There will be an energy tax, we are all promised that. Maybe it is not called a tax, maybe it’s a usage fee, but it’s money out of a person’s pocket whether they are retired, or a student renting a dorm room.
Then. common sense tells us that the wealthy alone cannot foot the bill for universal health care. A 4% increase on their rate of taxation, just isn’t going to do it. We’re trilions in debt now, and the war in Afghanistan is escalating. The war along the Mexican border is becoming serious. All the stimulus-funded education mandates that will be handed out next year, will leave a burden on cities and towns — they will be required to raise property taxes to keep up. The taxation will come in every form imaginable. From energy tax/fees, to property tax, to tax on income, Americans will have less money in their pockets at the end of the month. A lot less.
Marjorie: Here’s a link from the Times that might set your mind at ease somewhat. I think some of your fears are from a miscalculation on some of these issues. One little local tale: The nearby town which we moved from four years ago was raising taxes every bloody year so that we were paying $12,000 annually (We had a large home on a large property). This year, I hear, it is lowering taxes. ??
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/us/politics/28orszag.html?ref=todayspaper
phyllis: Here’s a link from the Times that might set your mind at ease somewhat.
I browsed the link, and found it to be a mini-bio of Orszag. I haven’t been trusting the NY Times for balanced news of late, but I’ll try to watch for this handsome young man on C-SPAN if he’s ever part of any of the hearings.
…it is lowering taxes. ??
Unusual. The big complaint around here is, if the valuation of our property has dropped, why is it that property taxes have not followed? Big laugh from the Town Treasurer… the formula is adjusted so that the tax rate allows the town to collect the same revenue, plus 2-1/2% over. If and when tax rates go down, it’s pennies… when they are adjusted upward, it’s hundreds of pennies.
Bella…thank you so much for this….not good news at all….
Bella
If they are right, that is pretty daunting.