Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Toxic Divorces | 03/19/2009 11:20 am

Marie Douglas-David: $43M Prenup Isn't Going to Cut It

Husband George David is worth $300 million … and she wants a big piece of it
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Marie Douglas-David © AP

A woman divorcing her high-powered, older husband claimed in court yesterday that the currently reported $43-million prenuptial agreement isn’t going to cut it.

My God, woman!

The poor little lady — a 36-year-old unemployed Swedish countess, Marie Douglas-David — is splitting from her 67-year-old uber-wealthy husband. As reports state, George David, Chairman of United Technologies, is worth an estimated $300 million, and Douglas-David wants a hefty piece of that fortune.

According to the Hartford Courant and New York Post, both parties slung their mud in Hartford Family Court Wednesday. The husband’s attorney, Anne Dranginis, said her client endured "ridicule" and "constant berating" from his wife. Meanwhile, the wife’s lawyer, Bill Beslow, said it was her controlling husband who pushed the then-successful investment banker to quit her high-paying job. Both parties accused the other of having affairs. We should mention that Douglas-David wore $225,000 Harry Winston earrings (a gift given her by hubby George in happier times) in court.

Court papers filed last month revealed why $43 million may not be enough for the countess to survive: She and her husband maintain unbelievably lavished lifestyles. Click here to see how Douglas-David burns through $53,000 a week and husband David makes more than $200,000 disappear. It’s magic, really.

When we first introduced wOwers to this story in December 2008 — just when most Americans began to seriously worry about their dwindling 401Ks — wOw user My Alias nailed the ridiculousness of this right on the head: "Marie, pay my mortgage!"

Well said. What would divorce lawyer to the stars Robert Cohen say?

17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

LC4
You’re kidding me right! Married six years ,voluntarily stopped working and hubby supported her. There are no children from this relationship. She stands to gain 43 MILLION DOLLARS! Yeah! I feel sorry for her! Give me a break! I’m suppose to feel sorry for this greedy spoiled cash——-! People are starving, lost their jobs and homes. Size down and budget like the rest of us. 
By LC4 on 03/19/2009 11:56 am
DianaT
Well, in my humble opinion, I hope the judge socks it to her.  It was her decision to sign off on the pre-nup.  No contest as far as I’m concerned.
By DianaT on 03/19/2009 1:46 pm
ChristiS
I can’t believe the greed of people.  How can you not live on 43 MILLION DOLLARS?  She is ridiculous!!
By ChristiS on 03/19/2009 1:50 pm
ChrisGlass
Part of the reason women have a hard time getting a fair shake in court during a divorce is people like Marie Douglas-Davis. The majority of people worldwide could live happily on what she spends in one week. Her greed tars all women who simply might be seeking subsistence to raise their children.

This woman certainly didn’t live this way before her high profile marriage so why should she get any more than the prenuptial agreement she freely signed? This woman smacks of greed.
By ChrisGlass on 03/19/2009 1:58 pm
RachelF
If only we all had such "problems" to contend with in our daily lives. :P
By RachelF on 03/19/2009 3:53 pm
peggydelprete

$

 

 

 

43 MILLION YOU SAIDLET HER EAT CAKE!!!!!!!!!!!4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$43 MILLION NOT ENOUGHLET HER EAT CAKE!

PEG

 

 

 

By peggydelprete on 03/19/2009 9:21 pm
MaryQuiteContrary

Peggy, Peggy, Peggy…if she ate the cake, well then she’d have to hire a personal trainer to help her work it off…

43 million is not enough.  Wow.  She really is going to be in high demand after this divorce circus.  Apparently money, a title, an education didn’t do too much for girlfriend’s common sense and reasoning abilities. 

 

 

By MaryQuiteContrary on 03/20/2009 8:14 am
margeyaspan

She comes off as a greedy gold-digger and sheds a bad light on women looking for a fair settlement.

I supported my ex through medical school, internship, residency AND fellowship.  He never had a student loan to repay!  I made the down payment on our first home.  Did I mention the 2 toddlers while I worked full time?

 Well, he became a big time surgeon, with a big time ego which came with entitlement rights to womanize and throw tantrums.

 After 28 years I hired one of the best lawyers in NY (equitable distribution here) and we got half of the marital assets.

 He squealed  like a pig and still won’t talk to me (thank God).

His side:  "She didn’t work 60 hour weeks, get up in the middle of the night for emergency surgery, etc." 

 How do you feel about this scenario?  He DID earn most of the money, after all.

 Marge 

By margeyaspan on 03/21/2009 8:40 pm
VictoriaJ
Oh please…she didn’t earn the money…she married it.  $43 Million is adequate pay for a 6 year visit. I hope the prenup holds and his ex has to figure out how to live on $43 million bucks…how there’s a sense of entitlement for you! But he deserves the hassle…he married this silly woman.
By VictoriaJ on 03/22/2009 2:07 pm
SteveDouglass
And women wonder why men no longer want to get married.
By SteveDouglass on 03/23/2009 11:08 am
SuzannedeCornelia1
And men wonder why there is nothing they can do to get a woman to marry/put up with them.
By SuzannedeCornelia1 on 03/23/2009 5:21 pm
sheristgeorge

Get the facts buddy. He bullied, coerced and threatened her into the POST-nup agreement. Then HE had her quit her job so that she could be with him when he traveled for business ect. HE filed for divorce and she went to Sweden and had a weekend affair. HE had been having affairs with multiple women at that point and puts his mistress up in his Avon home. HE was angry with her when she had a miscarriage and wouldn’t visit her, BECAUSE HE was busy with his mistress. HE gifted her with those jewels, but they aren’t hers, they are in his name so he could cheat on taxes. Shall I continue?

By sheristgeorge on 03/23/2009 3:24 pm
SuzannedeCornelia1
Good summation, Sheri. I say stick it to him for all she can. He is an outsized cad, was the head of a horrid war profiteering multinational, and is a yucky looking smoker to boot. 
By SuzannedeCornelia1 on 03/23/2009 5:28 pm
SteveDouglass
Bullied? Coerced? How about she could just say ‘no’ to the marriage. That’s it, end of the relationship. Buh-bye.
By SteveDouglass on 03/24/2009 3:38 am
PatienceHackler
Well, if he "bullied, coerced and threatened" her into a post-nup agreement, she should have known in THAT VERY MOMENT to sign nothing and walk away.
By PatienceHackler on 04/23/2009 3:12 pm