The Economy: Citigroup, GE Profits | 04/17/2009 9:15 am
More Good News From Wall Street: Citigroup Finally Posts Profit, GE Not Too Shabby

Citigroup stockholders are breathing a sigh of relief today.
The beleaguered bank this morning announced it made a first-quarter net income of $1.6 billion – the first time it has turned a profit in 1.5 years. That number may not seem like much, but compared to the $5.11 billion loss it reported this time last year, it’s great. Citi’s revenue was $24.8 billion – up a whopping 99 percent.
Shares rose 50 cents, or 12.5 percent, to $4.51 in trading before the market opened – a superb sign for a company that has had a pretty dismal performance on Wall Street lately and that has been bailed out by the federal government three times. But Citi — and the rest of the banking sector — isn’t out of the mud yet.
"We’ve seen good trading results from JPMorgan, from Goldman Sachs and now from Citi," Gary Townsend, CEO of Hill-Townsend Capital LLC told Bloomberg. "There is a question about sustainability, but it’s clearly a good sign for the sector.”"
Meanwhile, General Electric’s profits dropped 35 percent this quarter – but that’s less expected and it was enough to give GE stock a boost in early-morning trading. Demand for energy equipment and jet engines seems to have balanced out big losses in real-estate and rising consumer-credit defaults at GE Capital. Stocks overseas surged on this news, and upon hearing good news from the likes of Toshiba, Barclays and UBS.
Let’s hope these moves into the black continue!























5 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Could someone explain to me how come these banks have billions stuck into them from the TARP and NOW are posting huge profits??? This just don’t add up in my opinion.
Because Mark to market accounting rules and secure reserves allow them to lend money at a profit.
It should have been done a year ago…..
I just hope it continues……
I think it has more to do with the Treasury Yield Curve.
If you are a bank and you can borrow short term money at 0.5 % and lend it long at 5.0 % you can make a profit.
When the yield curve is inverted, as it was for much of last year, it costs you more to borrow money than you can make when you lend it.
Here’s a useful site to help explain this:
http://stockcharts.com/charts/YieldCurve.html
Seems pretty easy to take in Billions of Dollars from the Feds and 3 months later show some of that on your balance sheet?