Wall Street Weekly | 04/10/2009 12:00 am
Mother Nature Versus Ben Bernanke? Liz Peek Is Betting on Bernanke

© Getty Images
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 4/5)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Mother Nature is not helping. It snowed yesterday in New York —can you imagine? Forget the new Easter outfit! Last weekend, when the sun finally warmed up the Northeast, my retail spies tell me that business was brisk; this week not so much. Apparently Fed Chair Ben Bernanke can’t control the weather.Let’s hope he can control the financial markets. The tidal wave of government initiatives aimed at revving the economic engines has so far yielded only modest results. Programs like Treasury Secretary Geithner’s PPIP (the public-private partnership) and the TALF (Term Asset-backed Loan Facility) that require investor participation may have been doomed by Congress’s shenanigans over AIG’s bonuses. Who wants to get in bed with Barney Frank for heaven’s sake?! (Maybe I should rephrase that.)
By the way, it occurred to me this morning that trying to sort out these acronyms is like learning every four years to distinguish toe-loops from salchows; come another Olympics we have to figure it out all over again. I guarantee you that five years from now none of us will have a clue what TARP stood for.
Anyway, the TALF is meant to boost lending for myriad purposes, including credit cards, student loans and auto purchases – for actual people. The first TALF auction drew a disappointing $4.78 billion of loans; the most recent one attracted only $1.7 billion. This is alarming, since loosening such credit is essential to putting soccer moms back in the consumer driver’s seat. The Fed minutes from mid-March released yesterday say it all: “Private firms might be reluctant to borrow from the TALF out of concern about future changes in government policies that could affect TALF borrowers.” No kidding.
The PPIP is looking even more fragile. Investors are fearful that if they join in and make a profit, Congress will be outraged and will levy a tax on their gains. I would be, too.
The PPIP has not yet been launched, but of course has been dissected ad nauseam. Investors continue to worry about banks going bust, and indeed an especially gloomy report on the topic issued Monday caused the market to crater for the first time in weeks. The government’s planned stress-testing of the banks continues to cloud the sector’s prospects. I say, “Get it over with!” Until they do, and the big banks have passed, the market may tread water.
Still, it’s not all about the banks. As I said last week, the recent rally reflects good news from U.S. auto sales, housing, consumer spending and reduced inventories. As we kick off earnings season, when companies will report their first-quarter results, look for the market to plunge with shortfalls and rise with positive surprises. The good news is that analysts have substantially lowered estimates for this year. Yesterday, for instance, Bed, Bath and Beyond reported happy news — the stock was up 24%.
Another cheering the market yesterday was Pulte Homes’s proposed purchase of rival Centex. Acquisitions bespeak confidence, and in this case also suggest that the plunge in homebuilding may be moderating. Last week saw an 11% rise in loan applications for new houses.
For sure, a 50% selloff in stocks should spawn takeover activity. Though financing is basically nonexistent for buyouts today, corporations with strong balance sheets (and there are plenty of those) should jump in to take advantage of cheaper prices. Nothing could make the market – and investment banks – happier.
Elsewhere, reports suggest that China is growing more rapidly than expected. Demand for steel, chemicals and coal are rising in China, and consumers are boosting auto purchases as well. This is very bullish for Asia, and indeed for the entire world. Expect to see China become an ever-louder voice in international conversations.
Read more about: Ben Bernanke, Finance, Government, Liz Peek, Money, Mother Nature, News, Politics, PPIP, Recession, TALF, TARP, Tim Geithner, Wall Street Weekly























13 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
rocky: …to the Obama administration?
He hasn’t been in long enough to have caused any change. A shovel hasn’t been dipped into the ground yet on the enormous stimulus (porkulus) bill recently passed by the Dems. The credit doesn’t go to Obama and the blame doesn’t go to Bush. Economies react to all sorts of things, even oil prices. They dip and they recover. Nice to hear they are on the upturn.
Mel: …blaming the tanking market on Pres. Obama on this site.
Obama started his adminstration with a doom and gloom message. The economy was tanking, America was on the path to destruction, things were going to get much, much worse before they got better, and only he could turn it around by changing the way America thinks, and most of all by throwing enormous amounts of money at the problem in the form of earmarks for his supporters. In short, the message was dour. Investors became skittish, but as better numbers came in the market rallied. Obama had no influence over the first quarter numbers, they just happened to be better than many economists predicted. Maybe TARP funds helped some banks, but those TARP funds are not all spent, and might not need to be spent. I’m no kind of an economist, but I do realize that economies take a few years, (maybe decades) to go really bad, and they don’t turn around in one quarter. Certainly the stimulus bill passed in February has not taken effect yet.
Hi Liz,
Thanks for the article. I am not a fan of Obama either, but he is a Master Illusionist in the Tradition of Machiavelli, with more than a trick in his pocket! While he campaigned for the populist ideas of windmills and solar panels, he can also bow to the King!
After all, in the Tradition of his father and step father, the former worked for oil companies in Kenya and the later was an indonesian oil manager!
sibelle: While he campaigned for the populist ideas of windmills and solar panels, he can also bow to the King!
Interesting assessment.
While I think that utilizing wind and solar energy are excellent avenues to pursue, natural gas and coal cannot be forgotten. We must use all of our energy options. Before all of you "green" people get your panties in a bunch, technology has advanced enough to allow us to utilize coal in a much cleaner fashion than we used to be able to. This would also massively stimulate our midwestern economy. I personally would love to use solar energy to power my home, but it is cost prohibitive at this point to convert. Not to mention, living in Texas, what a hail storm would do to the panels! If I ever move out of the city and have a bit of space, i will not only have solar panels, but a windmill as well. I’d be willing to share with the neighbors. The power companies here commit full out robbery every month. Without running heat or air conditioning, my electric bill is still $300 (no lights aren’t left on, etc). A note to the environmentalists….I was browsing around the internet one day and found that there was an issue with some proposed sites for wind farms. It would disrupt the views and might disrupt the habitat for some desert turtle. You can’t have it both ways folks! We absolutely have to reduce our dependance on foreign oil. I agree that the skyrocketing oil prices last year was the biggest factor in the financial crisis. I also believe that it was a delibrate action by OPEC to get the Republicans out of the White House.