Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 08/07/2009 10:00 am

Needed: A Lemonade Stand at the White House, by Liz Peek

© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 8/3) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

The admiring press has noted that President Obama and his wife have provided their daughters, Sasha and Malia, with a summer full of fun – but also rich with learning. They have visited the Eiffel Tower and clambered around the Pantheon – while at the same time receiving gentle lectures from Mom and Dad about slavery (in Ghana) and the sacrifices made by our military (Ft. McNair). This is an inspiring model for parents everywhere; more visits to historical landmarks and less time playing video games should be on every family’s vacation agenda. But there’s one summer ritual conspicuously missing from the White House’s program: a lemonade stand.

Our family has been lucky to spend part of every summer in a small seaside village where the local market bakes blueberry muffins and the speed limit is 20 miles per hour. Children barely out of diapers are let loose to wander the narrow shell lanes, with parents confident that their neighbors will watch out for any stragglers. More than once we have fed unknown youngsters who wandered in during the dinner hour and joined the chaotic crowd in the kitchen. In short, this summer community is small and safe, and perfect for allowing children the freedom to spread their wings.

For our family, raised primarily in New York City, this security was a blissful break from an overprotected environment, and gave rise to any number of special activities. Chief among these was the opportunity to engage in small-time entrepreneurship. That’s a fancy way of saying that my kids blew the socks off the lemonade trade. One day when my then-ten-year-old was mooning around the house complaining of nothing to do, I offered to hire him and his best friend for $2 an hour to help me do some cleaning. They took on the job with gusto, but after about 45 minutes got bored and started goofing off – so I fired them.

Initially peeved, they decided to set up a lemonade stand. They carried a table and chairs to the end of the lane where we rented a house, baked up some brownies, mixed up a pitcher of frozen lemonade and set up shop. Before long the local tour bus stopped, dozens of passengers tumbled out, and within ten minutes my son’s entire inventory was gone. Even after I charged them for "cost of goods sold," i.e., the brownie and lemonade mixes, my son and his friend walked off with $80 for about two hours’ work. An entrepreneur was born.

Silly as it sounds, figuring out how to earn real money at an extremely young age was one of my kids’ greatest summer lessons. They ventured into numerous activities, including starting up a day camp called the Happy Clams that netted a veritable fortune. They looked after (even) younger children at the beach while moms went to the market or for a run. Demand was such that they had to hire several helpers. Things were going great until the morning they devised a treasure hunt. They buried lots of toys and goodies, but then lost the lot when one of their helpers unwittingly picked up the shovel that marked the spot. Four hours of fruitless digging later, some pretty frustrated children had to be treated to ice cream, blowing the day’s budget. Another lesson learned.

Such experiences are vastly – and universally – valuable. These days we hear a lot about credit card companies and mortgage providers purposefully drowning consumers in unmanageable debt. In fact, Congress is working on a consumer protection bill that is meant to keep Americans from getting in over their heads financially. Some of the proposals will probably help, but wouldn’t it be a better idea to educate people so they can figure these matters out for themselves? How crazy is it that most young people are force-fed trigonometry but never, ever, taught to balance their checkbook? Or how to calculate interest, or work out a budget? Running a lemonade stand gives kids their first primer on the mysterious world of economics – and a good one at that.

775 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

deber B

I believe Liz Peek delivers a real financial column.   She reports the statistics…and there’s no way anyone from the left or right can distort financial information.   If we had a democratic journalist submit a financial column that journalist would deliver the same information.   What I believe is an irritant to the democrats on this site is that it is a harsh reflection on President Obama.  

We all have to face the facts.   The "fluff" threads aren’t of interest to most posters.   They want a strong political thread that addresses current news.   All anyone has to do is revisit these threads to see the number of hits by democrats, independents and republicans.    The democrats complain nonstop about the republicans taking over the political threads however you would be amazed at how many democrats are posting their hearts out trying earnestly to get their points across.   In my opinion, the democrats on this site haven’t been "challenged" when posting their views until this past year.   They don’t like it and they seem angry about it.   Hey, I can understand….look at the Town Hall Meetings and watch both democrats and republicans openly disagree in a public forum.   If you think wow is the only place where this is happening you aren’t current with the news.   We are small potatoes here….the real anger and disappointment is being measured across our 50 states.

Liz Peek brings the raw truth to this site and, unfortunately, it outrages the democrats.   I mean, "How dare anyone say anything truthful about the state of our economy under this President of the United States?"  

George Bush, my friend, you are going to look like a saint in 2012.   Hang in there, buddy.   History will be very kind to you one day.    And, you might want to wipe that smile off your face before someone sees it!   : )

By deber B on 08/10/2009 8:17 am
MK P

Well wouldn’t you find it interesting, deber, to see IF a financial column written by a moderate WAS different?   Liz Peek does not report statistics — she publishes selected poll numbers.   

I agree, we do need to have ALL the facts — which is why it would be a great idea to have a real financial column that was not dedicated to furthering the interests of the right.

As for the anger……..everyone on this board is able to see where the strident, angry posts come from……….they can make their own conclusions.   The same is true in the town hall meetings — it is obvious who is responsible for the strident angry posts……..you can’t spin that.

Oh……and sainthood for GWB……..that quite honestly is a slap in the face to all who do honestly believe in saints.

By MK P on 08/10/2009 8:31 am
deber B

I hear what you are saying, MK, about another financial column.   I’m all for that as the more information we have to exchange the better.   However, no matter how you slice it, Liz Peek pulls her information from the same source a democratic leaning financial columnist would provide.   There’s no way to get around it.   I don’t agree that Liz Peek’s column furthers the interests from the right.  

Regarding GWB, I stated that he will look like a saint by 2012.   I’m not really sure it will happen by then but what I do know is that he did alot of things right.   Even Obama has had the good advice to leave certain things in place as arranged by George Bush.  

The anger is coming out everywhere.  They are still the minority groups.    It is my opinion that a person "gives away their power" when they become angry.   You literally hand it over to your opponent.  

Didn’t mean to slap you in the face.   Not my intention.   : )

By deber B on 08/10/2009 9:40 am
MK P

Thank you, deber — just as Obama does not do everything right, GWB did not do everything wrong.    Each individual can judge for themselves whether or not GWB made some huge blunders which took our country down the wrong road.   It is yet to be seen whether or not Obama can turn the country around from those blunders and set it on a good path again — however, along with Warren Buffet and a majority of Americans, I believe Obama has taken the first steps.

I agree…….I think anger is a negative emotion…….and that arguing is a waste of time……..LISTENING one another and actually considering the opinions of others is a good thing.   However, no one wants to have have another’s opinion shoved at them in an effort to drowned their opinion out.   Some on this board seem to be interested in arguing, that’s not what drives me.   I posted the below a while back, don’t know if you saw it — but, I think it is worth the read.

The Argument Clinic
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.
                                                ― Source unknown       Monty Python had a hilarious skit called “The Argument Clinic.” At the Argument Clinic you would find a person in each room waiting to argue with you. After you paid your fee you could have an argument on any topic of your choice. One funny scene portrayed a fellow who accidentally wandered into the Argument Clinic, where one of the staff picked a fight with him. “I don’t really want to argue,” the visitor protested. “Why not?” the arguer rebutted. “What’s wrong with you? Are you a chicken or something?” So went the argument over whether it was worthwhile to argue!       Some people in our life represent the staff of the Argument Clinic. They like to fight over just about anything, and if you come into their radar they will pick a fight with you. Whether or not you choose to engage is up to you. It takes two people to fight, agreeing that the fight is worth fighting. If you would rather not fight, you don’t have to go there.       Just because other people find fighting fun doesn’t mean that you have to do it. They perceive a greater payoff in conflict than in harmony. That’s just fine ― everyone gets to play out their idea of fun. Sometimes when our dogs get into a tug of war over a toy or chew stick, I will find another object and give it to them so each dog has one of their own and they don’t have to fight over it. But they could care less to have one of their own; it’s much more fun for them to wrestle over one. So now we just let them have their fun in their own way.       Conflict is not bad, and we all have our moments of it. You should, however, be at choice about whether you want to engage. I believe that within each person who likes to fight, there is a person who more deeply values harmony and connection, but they have become so steeped in the habit of conflict that they have lost sight of the connection option. If you visit the Argument Clinic, do so because you would choose to, not because someone drags you into their room.   How could you reduce conflict in your life by simply refusing to engage? I cultivate inner peace and release those who seek conflict.  

Wisdom for Today © 2009 by Alan Cohen www.alancohen.com

 

By MK P on 08/10/2009 9:56 am
MK P

Oh……I forgot to address what you consider "fluff" threads — just because a thread does not generate a huge amount of discussion certainly doesn’t mean it is not of interest to people who visit this website.

There are maybe a couple of hundred people who actually post on the political threads…….I see in the last week that more people are beginning to post on the political threads, which is good and I think as we continue to have discourse without attacking one another that will hopefully increase and more will share their ideas.   But, I am sure there a hundreds of thousands of women who visit this site every day to read what you consider to be "fluff" threads.   Very few people spend their entire day on this board……..they come in and read what interests them, don’t post, and go on with their lives.

 

By MK P on 08/10/2009 8:41 am
Kelly In Texas

MK P…where do you you get your facts about who posts on wow and why? I would be interested in seeing those type of statistics…

I think that the "fluff" is a waste of space and insulting to women. Not to mention a total bore.

This idea that things here are not "civil" is not too hard to figure out. Language that is allow on prime time TV should be fine on a site for adult American women with half a brain.

When the commincations regress to silly put downs, that is easy enough to scroll on by. It is not neccessary to protect us from silly comments. It is just an excuse to silence a dissenting opinion and nothing more.

Very transparent….yet so Obama-like. Now how can that be?

FSM~

By Kelly In Texas on 08/10/2009 12:05 pm
Tinka Parker
I agree. Liz Peek started out with an informative, helpful woman-oriented set of lessons about finance so that we could navigate what was already a very shaky economy. Now that her partisanship has emerged, she of course is getting more comments than anyone else. I guess she has taken the Fox News approach - the more offensive and specious you are, the more attention you get. But why really does she want this government to fail and for Wall Street to get back to business the way they like it? Because, in the end, like her Wall Street colleagues she wants to go on lining her pockets. When do you finally have enough money, Liz? (Certainly not from your investment strategies in 2008. Almost everything you recommended was self-serving or just plain wrong.)
By Tinka Parker on 08/11/2009 5:16 pm
sibelle daubigne
Marjorie,   Don’t worry about Liz Peek! She is a talented woman! Look at the many women she attracts every week! She is on top of her game! We need more like her!
By sibelle daubigne on 08/09/2009 10:36 am
Marjorie C.

sibelle:  We need more like her!

Actually, we do.  She (Liz Peek) stirs up a lot of dialogue.  And she makes economics somewhat easy to understand.  A dry column on finance (I hate numbers) would be something I’d choose not to read.

By Marjorie C. on 08/09/2009 12:08 pm
sibelle daubigne
Marjorie,  Liz is a great contributor to wowowow! Well done!
By sibelle daubigne on 08/09/2009 12:35 pm
MK P

Hating numbers gets a lot of women in trouble — allowing their husband or their financial advisor too much control over their financial destiny.   A good financial writer can make financial concepts really interesting — Suzie Orman comes to mind.

By MK P on 08/09/2009 12:37 pm
L. C.

MK P

There are a number of  female financial writers who indeed make financial concepts interesting.

#1 Anita Bunkley

#2 Jean Chatzky

#3 Suze Orman

#4 Brooke M. Stephens

#5 Stacey Tisdale

These women are true professionals. Persons whose job is to inform and educate not deal in bashing and deception!

By L. C. on 08/09/2009 4:13 pm
DeBúrca obj
No Marjorie, the "Libs" on this site want wowOwow to do a better job of accurately labeling their columnists. Truth in advertising. This column is about Obama bashing and pushing a neocon agenda, period. 
By DeBúrca obj on 08/09/2009 3:06 pm
Tinka Parker
Hear, hear. Maybe we should just leave the neocons to their own discourse and stop fighting back. Let them lie in their mud.
By Tinka Parker on 08/11/2009 5:17 pm
DeBúrca obj
Don’t forget, war profiteering and doing business with the Saudis… would be considered great "business accomplishments" to any neocon.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/09/2009 11:22 pm