Wall Street Weekly | 07/10/2009 9:45 am
Stimulus Not Working? Let's Have More! by Liz Peek
If the stimulus spending isn’t working, does it make sense to make it bigger?

© Shutterstock
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 7/6)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Holy smoke! Now even the Pope is weighing in on financial regulation. In a rare encyclical, the Pontiff added his voice this week to those clamoring for economic overhaul. Come to think of it, maybe we could use some divine guidance.The Big Debate underway is whether the United States needs a new stimulus program. This is idiotic. Whether you are a fan or foe of the monstrous $787 billion package pushed through Congress earlier this year, it is preposterous to assume that such an ungainly mishmash of programs could be implemented to any real effect in just a few months. Some $100 to $150 billion of the total has been committed to various projects, but only a portion of that has found its way into bank accounts. Moreover, if the stimulus spending isn’t working – does it make sense to make it bigger? No!
Anxiety about the stimulus package, and about the course of the economy, stems mainly from rising unemployment. The administration’s rosy outlook for stemming job losses proved unrealistic. (This should give some pause to those who buy into Obama’s projected "cost savings" from health-care reform or "green job creation" from cap-and-trade. These numbers, truly, are complete fiction. There is nothing I have found in either bill that would support such projections.)
While the labor situation does look gruesome, there are some encouraging signs. The four-week moving average of unemployment claims dropped in May by 53,000; normally a decline of 40,000 would signal the end of a recession. Continuing claims, though still high, appear to be peaking. The truth is that the numbers are so messed up by the auto industry bankruptcies that they are inconclusive. Data from the next two or three months will be much more telling.
While the signals are still mixed, there continue to be more positive than negative readings on the economy. Business confidence is improving, earnings estimates are moving slightly higher, the drop in consumer credit has slowed, house prices are stabilizing and manufacturing inventories are dropping. Moreover, two serious developing headwinds – rising oil prices and higher interest rates – have slumped from their recent highs.
The latter is good news and bad news, and points to just how delicate the current outlook remains. Oil prices and interest rates have backed down because growth prospects suddenly dimmed – dimmed precisely because oil prices and interest rates had increased. Investors, and policymakers, are in effect chasing their own tails. As oil prices zoomed higher in recent months, and as investors become concerned about projected budget deficits from our free-spending administration, consumers were hit with higher fuel costs and a drop in the opportunity to refinance their mortgages. This latter activity, as I’ve written before, has been far more stimulative than any program out of the Beltway.
The respite on interest rates may prove short-lived. The Federal Reserve has signaled that it is becoming less aggressive in its purchases of certain assets, including Treasuries, as it begins to unwind the buildup of its balance sheet. Some fear the Fed may be moving too quickly to rein in its largesse, but others correctly point out that moves to stimulate or restrict the economy almost always are overdone.
The Fed has to get this sort of push-pull just right, or it is possible that we could indeed fall back into recession. Joe Biden was blasted recently for admitting that the administration had "misread" the economy. Newsflash: this is tricky business, which is why many people, including myself, are aghast at the Obama team’s growing incursions into all sectors of commerce.
Read more about: Barack Obama, Business, Ecnomic Stimulus, Government, Liz Peek, Money, News, Obama Administration, Wall Street Weekly























163 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Now that made me laugh…how you ruined a thread over the handbag…you just can’t make this stuff up can you?? What would Lucy say to that???? Now I have heard everything!!!!
Just remember…"Buyer’s Remorse" is starting to hit the libs more and more each day….I will be curious how long it will take for some the libs here to finally fess up!!!
phyllis: …mudslinging.
Likening Sarah Palin’s morals to the stench of a back alley Paris streetwalker, now that’s mudslinging at its finest, and it didn’t come from Deber or any Republican or Independent posting on this site. Debers’ observation was about something that was in the news all day. I really doubt that that was the cause of the string being closed down.
Stopping the malicious attacks has to come from the Dems, then they will stop on the Republican side. Your guys are in charge. All the wonderful decisions being made about spending and debt are being funneled through the Dems’ mindset. All the Republicans can hope to do is poke a stick in the spokes once in a while.
GEORGE BUSH’S STIMULUS CHECK:
The tax rebates will go to some 117 million Americans. Those individuals who don’t make enough to pay income taxes will get rebates of $300. The rebates will start to phase out for those who earn more than $75,000 or for couples who earn more than $150,000. Businesses will get tax write-offs that are double what they can take now on new investments, as well as incentives to invest in new equipment.
The measure also contains changes to federal mortgage programs aimed at helping homeowners facing foreclosure to refinance their loans.
Still, Democrats were clearly less than jubilant about the deal.
"I can’t say that I’m totally pleased with the package, but I do know that it will help stimulate the economy, and if it does not, then there will be more to come," Pelosi said.
The biggest complaint among Democrats was over what was left out, especially extended unemployment benefits. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) said he did not understand the resistance from the president and Republican congressional leaders to those additional benefits.
Still, Democrats in the House are expected to swallow their disappointments and overwhelmingly approve the package.
Senators, meanwhile, made it clear they would go their own way. Majority Leader Harry Reid said Senate Democrats would like to add a number of programs to the measure and that he considered the bill’s $150 billion price tag negotiable.
SPEND SPEND SPEND….nothing much changes with the democrats.