Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 08/05/2009 12:15 pm

Is There a Bonus Bias? by Shelby White

By Shelby White
© Shutterstock

Editor’s Note: Shelby White is a New York-based writer whose work has appeared in Barron’s, The New York Times and Forbes. She is the author of What Every Woman Should Know About Her Husband’s Money, published by Random House in 1992.   

It’s bonus time again. According to a report issued by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, nine banks distributed $32 billion in extra pay to their employees after receiving $175 billion in public funding. As the boys in the banks tally up their haul, there’s one question you can bet they are not asking: Is there bonus bias? Is that money going equally to men and women? Statistics are hard to come by about the actual bonus payments. But past analysis of the gender pay gap shows that women earn about 79% as much as men with an even greater gap for women working on Wall Street, who earn just 55.4% of what men do. It’s not a stretch to assume that once again the working woman is left in the dust.

Not that I’m the first to notice this. In June, Merrill Lynch broker Jamie Goodman sued the Bank of America (which now owns the brokerage firm) for gender bias over retention bonuses. Goodman had received high praise for her work, and was, according to the firm’s website, one of only 140 financial managers to receive a portfolio manager designation nationwide. But even that wasn’t good enough to give the $1 million producer what she thought was a fair shake.

Women are getting change, but it is still small.

19 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lila Kuh

I worked for a while in a government organization which handed out bonuses to "top performers."  In my opinion, the true top performers, whether men or women, did not get the big bucks.  The shameless self-promoters did.

One thing women need to learn to be more competitive is how to toot their own horns.  You may think it is crass or immodest, but NO ONE notices those who quietly and competently do their jobs every day, even if they really excel.

By Lila Kuh on 08/05/2009 2:25 pm
Maggie W
For awhile, I was a high school teacher.  One principal was a whip master.  She rode our backs day on end to get students’ scores up.  We dug in and those much improved scores came in , and of course, we were all thrilled for our kids.  She was thrilled, too.  She got a bonus of several thousand.  The teachers got a free breakfast of rolls, orange juice, and weak coffee.
By Maggie W on 08/05/2009 4:13 pm
aud b
Shady…. When I get a bonus because my team does well, I take that bonus money use it on the team.. gifts, catering, etc.  That money doesn’t belong to us, it belongs to the people that worked their butts of to make us, their leader, look good.
By aud b on 08/12/2009 7:42 am
Belinda Joy

I couldn’t agree with Lila more!

The biggest mistake women (and some men) make is the mistake in their belief that if they work really hard their boss will notice and then they will get recognition. I can not begin to tell you how wrong that is. It is the employee that not only works hard BUT ALSO tells their boss of their accomplishments on a regular (but tactful way - you don’t want to come off as a "know-it-all of kiss up) that gets the recognition.

I have always at every company I worked for "worked as if my name was on the company checks" Be aware of where you work, what they produce and why, clients and contracts they have and whenever possible try to learn as much about other departments and jobs so that you are perceived as an invaluable employee. Your role should never be to function as a worker bee or drone. No….it is always best to be the Queen Bee.

By Belinda Joy on 08/05/2009 2:54 pm
Rita@ Goldivas
What you say is true, Belinda, but I doubt if the bias on Wall Street is caused by these women not trumpeting their achievements. You can’t be a shrinking violet and do what they do. I think it’s just the good ol’ boys club that’s the culprit here.
By Rita@ Goldivas on 08/05/2009 6:53 pm
Belinda Joy

I hear what you’re saying Rita, but I have to disagree. I know a majority of women who are in power than those who are lower down on the ladder, and even among female executives there is this fear of losing their position. That it took years to make it to where they are and they don’t want to rock the boat or cause waves, so they acquiesce at every turn.

Now with that said, I agree with you that the good ol’ boys club is also at play.  How could it not be. Women can do the exact same job as their male counterparts and still earn a fraction of what the men do. So clearly sexism is a play. But I still say we as women have to assert ourselves at every turn. I don’t think we should play it safe and blend into the woodwork, we should try to stand out.

By Belinda Joy on 08/05/2009 7:18 pm
Lila Kuh
Belinda, ahhh, to be in the military, where salary is determined by rank and years of service, on a standard chart for all to see.  Provided we earn our promotions on time, women receive exactly the same salary as men.  The flip side is that the best performers earn no more than the merely adequate performers, but since I have seen how bonuses really work, I would prefer the good ol’ standard military pay chart.  Besides, there is additional special pay for things like combat tours, language skills, flight pay, jump pay, etc. - a standard bonus, in a way, for those who take extra risks or have special skills.
By Lila Kuh on 08/05/2009 10:01 pm
L. C.

Rita

I’m not going to try and re-invent the wheel so I’ll just say I agree with both you and Belinda Joy.

By L. C. on 08/06/2009 7:20 am
Victoria J
I agree Riva, at a certain point, your portfolio speakes for you in Finance. But the old boys club is not interested in how well you do the job. There are rules…I remember years ago in politics, the Speaker of the House made a woman his chief of staff, she had all the skills and background needed except one…she wasn’t a man…and part of her job was to know what was happening in every nook and cranny of the legislature…well men simply do not tell women the same things they would tell another male chief of staff. So she was useless to him and he hated making a change but the reality was she couldn’t bring him any intel.  The reality on Wall Street is  these guys probably talk about things that they wouldn’t share with their wives. I have a theory that men see their female colleagues the same way they see their wives. If a guy has a fight with his wife, he can come to the office and be slightly irritated with the first female he sees or if a female colleague gets legitimately angry about something he may asked if she’s on her period or think it…Many business colleagues experience female colleagues through the prism of their experience with their wives or girlfriends.
By Victoria J on 08/09/2009 8:57 pm
Lauriate Roly

Belinda Joy - I find your philosophy on this subject is dead-on, and with good reason, because it is identical to an attitude I learned early in my working career…and it has been very successful for me. I would shudder to have anyone think that I consider myself “number one”. I couldn’t live with that terribly selfish label. But, I learned that it was okay if my motto was, “Do something good, then, tell it”. This goes along with your theory of the employee that not only works hard BUT ALSO tells their boss of their accomplishments…but of course, not get branded “bragadoccio”. One must remember to develop and perfect the method you recommend, “the tactful way - you don’t want to come off as a "know-it-all of kiss up”. It all leads up to success, and success leads to salary increases and bonuses.

By Lauriate Roly on 08/05/2009 8:41 pm
Rachel M
I see that executives receive high bonus when they really did not work as hard as their lower level employees. They have contracts which allows them to receive higher bonus and it is not written in the agreements that they will only make a bonus if they were able to bring in business look at Merrill Lynch. I  do not have a degree and it was hard to see that I could not work my way up due to not having it. I have met those in higher positions who have no clue of what they are doing. I think that if someone shows that they can be in a higher position, they should not be held back due to not having a degree. I have found that during my work that the peons will not get a bonus if the company does not overall profit while the executives get their bonuses. They also keep themselves out of layoffs while those who actually do the work are let go. I have not seen where the little peons can not challenge the bonus structure. I have never been an executive but having worked as a executive assistant and have seen that they do get a contract. There is a bias about raises too.
By Rachel M on 08/05/2009 5:40 pm
Susan Crawford

This has been thought-provoking, all right. When the late sixties and early seventies feminist discussions came along, we were concerned about getting good jobs, being respected as equals, being considered as qualified contenders in the then mostly male-dominated fields like law, medicine, finance and on and on. And when we managed to break through in many ways, it soon became apparent that "equal pay for equal work" was NOT happening. It still isn’t. When I first began teaching, I was once told that a male colleague’s salary "had to be" more than mine because he was married and his wife was expecting, while I was a single woman whose "needs" were not as pressing. I seethed, and updated my resume and soon departed from that job. Today we wouldn’t hear something as blatant as I heard back in the day, but obviously there are many ways to hide the continued inequity in compensation, bonuses, promotions and so on.

Part of it, IMHO, may reside in women’s ability to negotiate firmly and assertively, to promote themselves effectively, and - most important - to develop a strong mentor network. For years, the boys met at the golf club, at the bar, at the gym, and did a lot of wheeling and dealing. Women, on the other hand, put in long, long hours, took work home, came in on weekends, and so on, and were not always in the loop of the politics of their organization. And let’s face it, finding the right way to make sure that your contributions and efforts are fully recognized is like walking a tightrope: one wrong phrase and you may be perceived as "aggressive"; "backstabbing"; "bitchy". (While the guys are just asking for their due, the women are "pushy".) 

This being said, we still have a long way to go in the workplace. What should be rewarded is often completely ignored. Those who reap the hefty bonuses and praise are often the ones who least deserve it. And in the financial sector, bonuses are negotiated via contractual obligation, as we have seen. Whether the person actually performed well, or brought the company to the point of utter chaos or ruin, that contract is ironclad, and the payout comes despite the mess. Grrrrrrr.  

By Susan Crawford on 08/06/2009 10:57 am
C jay

Great discussion - and Susan, you are right on target. In re: "we were concerned about getting good jobs, being respected as equals, being considered as qualified contenders in the then mostly male-dominated fields like law, medicine, finance and on and on." Yes, and we had to jog in place at the kitchen sink "after-hours." What we ignored was equity in the workplace; equality didn’t serve us well at all.

On the military plane - all government service provides open information about pay for each level. That is how the for-profit sector keeps people in the bucket, in fact, threatens those "who tell." I was consulting for a for-profit corporation once where the employees posted their salaries on a bulletin board. Three were summarily dismissed and I was awe-struck just listening to the nasty planning in the executive suite. Terrible conduct unbecoming any level of management.

Women have made their break-through today with the appointment of Sotomayor! The African Americans reached a peak. The Hispanics have too. But, for women - today we saw our presence increased on the U.S. Supreme Court. It has been long overude. Iran has more women in national power than the USA. basta!

By C jay on 08/07/2009 12:35 am
Susan Crawford
Yesterday’s appointment of Sotomayor was truly inspirational. Personally, I’m looking forward to this wise woman’s influence on the court. I think she will be fair, I think she will be completely respectful of the Constitution and will bring a broader perspective (and, yes, a little empathy, too) to the deliberations of the Supreme Court. It was a proud day for women. Now we have to keep it going in other spheres as well, C jay! And wouldn’t it be fabulous if the military model concerning pay would become the norm in civilian life and corporate structures as well? Something tells me they’s have to call out the military first to forse the corporate world to accept it, though. And don’t get me started on academia! Meantime, I’m going to listen to a little of the great Celia Cruz today in honor of the first woman of Hispanic descent to rise to the Supreme Court; Celia’s joyous shout matches my feelings exactly.
By Susan Crawford on 08/07/2009 5:22 am
C jay

 You are like a breeze from the ocean, Susan! It’s so relaxing to agree, isn’t it!

In re "corporate world" it’s an given, they’re grounded in abuse, and worse, perpetuate it, from the top down.

By C jay on 08/07/2009 9:44 am