Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 07/17/2009 12:30 pm

Will Congress Derail U.S. Recovery? by Liz Peek

© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 7/13) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

The economy is like a drunk stumbling out the door after closing hour. He lurches, misses a step, picks himself up and calls on all his resources to put one foot in front of the other. Pals wonder, will he make it home safely or spend the night in the gutter?

This week the betting was on a safe recovery, as investors celebrated higher than expected profit reports from Intel, Goldman Sachs and IBM by bidding the market up 8% through Thursday – the best multiday string in weeks. Adding to the fun was a more positive note from celebrity bank stock analyst (I just love that description) Meredith Whitney, the primero bear on the financial sector, successfully sniffing out toxic assets like a pig finding truffles. Ms. Whitney slapped a "buy" recommendation on Goldman, just in time for its astonishing profit report. At the same time, economist Nouriel Roubini, aka Dr. Doom, who has made his reputation by being relentlessly negative, suggested the recession would be over by year’s end.

I hate to be a party pooper, but a reading of the actual comments from Ms. Whitney and Mr. Roubini are not exactly uplifting. Ms. Whitney writes, "Our more bullish outlook on Goldman Sachs shares is deeply rooted in our sustained bearish stance on the U.S. economy and the state of U.S. financials at large. Specifically, we expect a tsunami of debt issuance from federal/sovereign, state and local governments to fund woefully underfunded budget gaps." In effect, Goldman will mainly benefit from helping our desperate government raise money.

Meanwhile, so offended was Mr. Roubini that someone might interpret his remarks as positive, he quickly put out a clarifying message saying that he had always projected that the recession would last two years; since we are 19 months into the gloom, he is consistent in saying the recession might end by December. He added that "the recovery would be weak and at risk of a double dip."

While the enthusiasm of investors for even such pale glimmerings of progress is good news – i.e., the market wants to go up – recent earnings releases leave much to be desired, and are inconclusive. Most companies that have reported better-than-expected results have depended on cost-cutting for their gains. With few exceptions, revenues are weak. A good example is Mattel, which reported a 19% drop in sales, but managed an 82% jump in profits thanks to reining in expenses. Google, similarly, reported record profits, but the stock got pummeled by slowing sales. Intel, which provided not only pleasantly surprising results but also buoyant guidance for the balance of the year, seems to have prospered largely because of a 21% quarter-to-quarter gain in sales in the Asia-Pacific region. The Americas constitute a mere 21% of revenues for the company.

In effect, the U.S. still labors under a cloud of consumer cutbacks, which are unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Job losses are declining as activity flattens, thank heavens, but the urge to trim expenses for businesses hoping to hold onto profits argues against any sudden upturn in hiring. We will see output begin to pick up in the second half as inventories reach unsustainably low levels, but consumption will remain weak. Going forward, in my opinion, the economy will be at the mercy of Congress and China. Heaven help us.

Spurning the lessons of history, Congress is just dying to raise taxes. The administration has made it clear that a recovery in the economy is secondary to pushing through its grandiose plans for health-care upheaval (I refuse to call it reform). Health-care bills are flying out of the House and the Senate, each more horrifying than the next. Don’t take my word for it – check out the testimony of Douglas Elmendorf, head of the Congressional Budget Office. He embarrassed legislators by his stark assessment that the bills emerging from the health committees of the House and Senate were unlikely to rein in spiraling health-care costs, and that in fact "the curve is being raised." Ouch.

108 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Diamond In The Rough
Powerline blog’s John Hinderaker notes that Congressional Budget Director Douglas Elmendorf testified today before the Senate Budget Committee that the Democrats’ various health care proposals will increase, not reduce, federal government spending on health care:

Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf warned lawmakers the legislation that he has seen so far would raise costs, not lower them.  Elmendorf was asked by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., if the bills Congress is considering would "bend the cost curve."  The budget director responded:  "The curve is being raised."
By Diamond In The Rough on 07/17/2009 12:45 pm
Maggie W
Senator Snowe has often been a voice of reason.  I hope the President will listen to her advice.  Clearly, this health care bill is not ready to debut.  After the August break, Congress and the President need to go back to square one.  The President wants the Senate to take up cap and trade in the Fall.  Congress may not like it, but they may have to do some serious multi tasking after the August break.  Why not?  Millions of Americans do that day after day and without that big salary or nice health care plan.
By Maggie W on 07/17/2009 1:01 pm
Kelly In Texas

Good post Maggie…we need the right bills for Americans…not just a quick fix. They can work just like we do…however, they rarely see it that way…recessing for a sports game…etc.

Back to square one.

By Kelly In Texas on 07/17/2009 2:22 pm
Libra Lady
I couldn’t agree with you more…Rushing to get this done before the August break is just asinine.  Heck with all the breaks…burn the midnight oil and get your heads together and come up with a plan that won’t put our Country into failure….if any member of this govt. wants to be re-elected, they better start listening to the people and accomplish something that every page is read and understood before signing.
By Libra Lady on 07/17/2009 7:37 pm
Maggie W
There you go, Libra! Spot on!  For so long, when Congress has been in session, they have shown up three days a week and favored very long lunches.  Now it’s time the rubber meets the road.  We elected them,  we pay them, and they and the President need to deliver a bill that serves this country well!  The only people in this country who really need to plan around a calendar are farmers.  I haven’t seen many on Capitol Hill in overalls lately.  Have you?    :)
By Maggie W on 07/17/2009 8:33 pm
Libra Lady
Maggie…omg…lmao…overalls….I can just picture that can’t you…especially barney frank and nancy pelosi (not to just point out the dems, but they come to mind first).  I think we need to make a career change here…too bad it costs so much to run!!!  You have a great weekend Maggie…  :-)
By Libra Lady on 07/17/2009 8:50 pm
Maggie W
Pelosi!   LOL !!  Yep!  But try to picture this.  Ready?  Rahm Emmanuel.  Where the heck would they find a size 2 in overalls?   Stay safe and have a great weekend, too, Libra.
By Maggie W on 07/17/2009 9:23 pm
Libra Lady
Maggie…ok…now the picture of rahm emmanuel just ruined me from having any kind of a good weekend….size 2 and extra short!!!
By Libra Lady on 07/17/2009 9:28 pm
canuck canuck

OMG - I AGREE with your post 100% ….. wait, as I look around and see if it is really me saying this : )

I think the concern is that the numbers for support are falling fast but I believe every American does know we need to get health care cleaned up and we need to get it right.  I do not support a government controlled system - but if enough insight is put into this I can be convinced (probably not truth be told).

We also need to let our representatives know that if and when this bill comes forward they had better damn well take the time to read it word for word.  They had better darn well know what is in it and understand it well enough that they can clearly explain to us what it means.  As well there better not be anything hidden in the language as there has been in others.

By canuck canuck on 07/17/2009 8:14 pm
Maggie W

This is so huge!  I do not understand why we have to eat the whole elephant immediately.  Why not start with Medicare and clean up that fraud eating monster?  That alone would save many multi millions within a relatively short period of time.   It concerns me greatly that big insurance has been wearing the only party hat for 70 years, but damn… the USA will not fall off the face of the Earth if we do not have a health care plan by August. 

Yes to what you say…. no hidden language.  No legal speak. No way.

By Maggie W on 07/17/2009 8:46 pm
Liz Peek
Hi Libra and Maggie- you both make me laugh- and boy do we need that right now! You are completely on the mark- the Obama administration is panicked that they won’t get a health bill through quickly, and that will be that. Could it be that a health bill was payback to Ted kennedy, who has long pushed for government healthcare, and who came out for Obama at a pivotal moment in the campaign? Something to think about. Meanwhile, Congress doesn’t even read the bills before voting some of the time - the Waxman bill was voted on hours after some 300 pages of ammendments were tacked on. Do we really think those who voted had analysed all those add-ons? No way. Representatives work for one thing - reelection. With a 2-year term who can blame them, but it is not a good system. We should be pushing term limits in the House - perhaps a limit of three two-year terms - that would be so constructive. I think our Founding Fathers never envisioned that people would become life-long politicians! All the best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 07/18/2009 11:52 am
Libra Lady

Liz….anything to bring some laughter to our world!!!  I agree…Term Limits is a Must!!!  We need new blood in the administration…they get set in their ways and know how to beat the system. And I heard the payoffs that were done to get Cap and Tax passed just makes me dis-trust the govt. all the more now.  How do we trust any bill they pass when no one has read it in its entiriety?  We elected this people to represent the people, but I think they are all in it for "what can it get me"?

I did hear that the Universal Health care plan is something kennedy has worked hard on…rather he really is capable of assisting now is kind of a secret…but it was said that just out of sympathy, the plan should pass because of kennedy…this I do not agree with!!!  It needs work…and to pass it now would only harm us more than help us.  I still have so many questions about the plan, and the commercials that are out there are not doing it for me. 

Thank you Liz, I always look forward to your editorial on Fridays.

P.S. 

Here is the site about they pay off to possibly vote for the Cap and Tax:

Big Dem cash dump on eve of climate vote

Three House Democratic leaders who were whipping members on the climate change bill gave tens of thousands in campaign cash to party moderates around the time of the 219-212 vote on June 26, according to Federal Election Commission records.

It’s impossible to tell if that torrent of cash was an attempt to schmear wavering Democrats — or just part of the usual cash dump made by leaders on the eve of the June 30 quarterly fundraising deadline.

Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) doled out $28,000 to reps who eventually voted yes on June 24, two days before the big vote — on a day when House leaders were doing some heavy-duty arm-twisting.

Clyburn recipients who voted for the bill included a who’s-who of battleground district Dems: Steve Driehaus, D-OH ($2,000); Martin Heinrich, D-NM ($2,000); Suzanne Kosmas, D-Fla. ($4,000); Betsy Markey, D-Colo. ($2,000); Carol Shea-Porter, D-NH ($2,000), Baron Hill, D-Ind. ($2,000); Alan Grayson, D-Fla. ($2,000); Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa ($2,000); Jim Himes, D-Conn. ($2,000);  Mary Jo Kilroy, D-OH ($2,000); Kurt Schrader, D-Ore. ($2,000); Jerry McNerney, D-Calif. ($2,000) and Tom Perriello, D-Va. ($2,000).

The same pattern held true for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who gave $4,000 to yes-voting Ohio Democrat Zack Space and the same amount to no-voting Chris Carney.

House Energy and Commerce Henry Waxman gave at least $16,000 to yes-voters on June, 25, FEC records show.

A Waxman campaign spokesman said the payouts were part of the usual "end-of-quarter activity."

Boehner gave $2,000 each in late June to Reps. Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.); Chris Lee (R-N.Y.), Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.), Joseph Cao (R-La.), Judy Biggert (R-Ill.), Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), Dan Lungren (R-Calif.), and Thad McCotter (R-Mich.). All of these Republicans are among the most vulnerable politically.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/Big_Dem_cash_dump_on_eve_of_climate_vote.html?showall

By Libra Lady on 07/18/2009 2:39 pm
Marjorie C.

Liz:  We should be pushing term limits in the House - perhaps a limit of three two-year terms - that would be so constructive.

Term limits would solve a lot.

Another thing our Founding Fathers probably never envisioned is that the country would become so big.  It’s a wonder the Constitution continues to work as well as it does.

By Marjorie C. on 07/19/2009 6:06 am
deber B
I agree, Marjorie!
By deber B on 07/19/2009 6:33 am
deber B

OBAMA’S ROOKIE MISTAKE EARLY ON….

It usually doesn’t happen this quickly in Washington. But President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are finding that the old maxim that what goes around, comes around applies to them, too. Less than six months into his term, Mr. Obama’s top initiatives — health-care reform and "cap and trade" energy legislation — are in serious jeopardy and he has himself and his congressional allies to blame.

Their high-pressure tactics in promoting and passing legislation, most notably the economic "stimulus" enacted in February, have backfired. Those tactics include unbridled partisanship, procedural short cuts, demands for swift passage of bills, and promises of quick results.

With large majorities in Congress and an obsequious press corps, Mr. Obama was smitten with the idea of emulating President Franklin Roosevelt’s First 100 Days of legislative success in 1933. Like FDR, Mr. Obama tried to push as many liberal bills through Congress in as brief a time as possible.

He made a rookie mistake early on. He let congressional Democrats draft the bills. They’re as partisan as any group that has ever controlled Congress, and as impatient. They have little interest in the compromises needed to attract Republican support. As a consequence, what they passed — especially the $787 billion stimulus — belongs to Democrats alone. They own the stimulus outright.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124804492049963557.html

By deber B on 07/20/2009 8:04 am