Sonia Sotomayor, Abortion | 05/28/2009 8:45 am
Abortion Rights Groups Worry Whether Sonia Sotomayor Would Uphold Roe v. Wade

Some abortion-rights groups are worried about potential Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Sotomayor has never ruled on any abortion-related cases, but The Los Angeles Times reports that some pro-choice activists are concerned about the lack of evidence proving that she supports upholding Roe v. Wade. In fact, in the one case that came the closest to a ruling on women’s reproductive rights — Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush — Sotomayor ruled against abortion-rights groups.
Sotomayor wrote the 2002 opinion for that case, which challenged the "Mexico City Policy" that prohibited foreign organizations receiving U.S. money from performing or supporting abortions. Abortion-rights groups protested the policy, saying it violated the First Amendment, due process and equal-protection rights. But Sotomayor relied on an earlier case law that said the First Amendment doesn’t apply in this way, and the government is "free to favor the anti-abortion position over the pro-choice position" with public funds.
"She wasn’t going to try to get out of that in a way another activist judge might have tried to do," Kevin K. Russell of Scotusblog told reporters yesterday. She "does not see it as her job to fix every social ill in the world or thinks her opinion is the only one that matters."
Naral Pro-Choice America is urging supporters to contact their senators and push them to have Sotomayor reveal her views on abortion and privacy rights during the Senate Judiciary Confirmation hearings. As for President Obama, the White House says the president never specifically asked Sotomayor for her views on abortion. But pro-life groups are also wondering where Sotomayor stands.
"What we have seen of Judge Sotomayor’s record so far sheds little light on her views regarding how the Constitution bears on the powers of elected lawmakers to protect the right to life of unborn children," Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee, told LifeNews.com. "We believe it is critical that senators thoroughly explore whether Judge Sotomayor believes that Supreme Court justices have the right to override the decisions of elected lawmakers on such issues as partial-birth abortion, tax funding of abortion, and parental notification for abortion."
Legal experts also say they see no sign of how Sotomayor would rule on any hot-button topics, including abortion, gay marriage or Second Amendment rights; gun-rights groups are also worried. A lack of a paper trail on these issues could bode well for Sotomayor, since it will provide less fuel for Republicans to oppose her. We wonder if that was purposeful on the president’s part.























115 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Barbara: As a woman I can not imagine her not supporting Roe V. Wade.
I agree, but as a woman I can see her not wanting to support parial-birth abortion. Always comes down to how she interprets the law.
Time magazine did a story on a woman who had the procedure - because her baby was developing with its brain outside its skull, and the reflex kicks as it grew could actually have been strong enough to rupture her uterus.
Intact dilation and extraction (or partial birth abortion) is sometimes more dangerous than actually giving birth. Nobody does this on a whim.
If he were practicing mediine for the money, he would have been doing liposuctions and nose jobs.
What the world can do without is hatred, judgement, and ignorance. Particularly the stubborn self-rightous ignorance of the anti-choice movement.
I’m sure many of you disagree, but I’m happy with the killing of Dr. Tiller the baby killer from Kansas. This world is made up of people that hate, judge, ignorance is always thrown in to make the debate sound better for the side that uses it.
Amy: I’m sure you have judged someone, and also hated someone in your life. You mentioned the word ignorance twice in your post. Why? Dr. Tiller killed babies anytime after 21 weeks, whether it was 8 or 9 months. He had bodyguards and was shot twice before. Imagine a baby at 8 months inside the womb. Dr. Tiller kills the baby inside the womb then removes and discards it, like trash. All for $5K.
40 million babies have been aborted since Roe v Wade. It just seems like that’s a lot of people to throw away.
Sorry, I should have said "self-rightous, PEDANTIC, ignorance".
But the bigger issue is that this thread is off topic, and your celebration of a man’s death is revolting. We’re done.
the only reason to remove a 7-9 month gestated child from the uterus before birth is because the child has a fatal disease that cannot be helped.
"partial birth abortions" do not happen. that is a myth.
no they do not. the only person who has any say on abortion is the woman who is considering the medical procedure.
if men want an abortion they should get a uterus.
"partial birth abortions" do not happen - unless the baby has a fatal disease or has died in the uterus, marjorie.