Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 07/04/2009 7:55 pm

Ann Coulter Explains Palin's Exit

By Ann Coulter
© AP
Editor’s Note: Ann Coulter is a political commentator, syndicated columnist and bestselling author. Her latest book is Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America.

I’m confused by all the confusion among the chattering classes about Palin. I thought her press conference explained it very clearly – though she couldn’t put it precisely this way without sounding vain, but it’s obvious.  

Even though she’s just a state governor, she’s a HUGE national star who is both sought after and attacked as if she is already a president (a Bush, not an Obama). But she basically can’t participate because she’s tethered to the governor’s office up in Alaska. Consequently, she has to fight with one hand tied behind her back and she also can’t go around the country campaigning for candidates and principles she believes in – because she’s governor and would be accused of neglecting the state.  

Meanwhile, the Lt. Gov. is a great guy, so she’s leaving the state in good hands and now she can go on to be an even bigger star. 

It’s a weird Washington insider perspective to be perplexed by what she’s doing. Contrary to Mark Sanford’s e-mails to his mistress, no one was really impressed with him; 99.99999999999999999% of Americans didn’t know who he was.  Who is more influential: Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge and Bill O’Reilly, or Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford (before the fall)? As Palin said, God bless people who run for political office, but – and she didn’t say this part – she’s too  big to be a lame-duck governor stuck dealing with fishing licenses in Anchorage right now.

She’ll be much bigger now and can play on the national stage without constantly setting off state ethics investigations by loons, parasites and liberals. None of this applied to McCain or Kerry – both of whom went back to the Senate – because their national campaigns diminished them. Palin’s national campaign made her a major star. As she said, she’s not retreating, she’s advancing in another direction. 

Click here for Margo Howard’s opinion on Palin’s exit.

Read more about: Ann Coulter, News, Politics, Sarah Palin

625 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maggie W
James, there is no " labeling" her a quitter.  That is precisely what she is.  As for that unbelieveable news conference… that was three kinds of weird!!!  The woman was either high or on the brink of a nervous break down.  She made Sanford’s rambling oratory seem like a Shakespearean soliloquy.
By Maggie W on 07/04/2009 9:20 pm
James the Game

Yeah. The Republicans need to promote a second Huckabee run, from their standpoint. Someone with credibility and character, and stability. I’m a Dem, so I won’t vote for someone as conservative as Huck. But I’m just saying, the Repubs need a stable, non-angry dude up front. McCain came across as angry and bitter. There are a couple of better female candidates out there on the GOP slate, much more stable than Sarah.

And by the way, as rambling and silly as Palin was, I agree wholeheartedly with her statements about the media witchhunt. It gets nauseating, but nowadays, don’t jump into the fire, if you don’t want your feet burned. There can be no thin skin in this era of 24/7 media. You will be scorched alive, no matter who you are.

By James the Game on 07/04/2009 11:11 pm
Karen R
On this side of the state it seemed like Romney was the early favorite but then did and said some things that didn’t sit well. I don’t think he’ll get a default homeboy vote again in SE Michigan. I suspect he’s much stronger on the west side. What’s your take on him - did his standing rise or fall and do you think at this point he appears to be the likely best candidate in the GR area?
By Karen R on 07/04/2009 11:19 pm
James the Game

Romney’s stock has risen nationally, in my opinion. West Michigan (Grand Rapids/Holland, anyway) is heavily Republican, so any conservative candidate will be favored here. Just like Pete Hoekstra (HOOK’-struh) in the gubernatorial race next year.

Frankly, I don’t know who will be running in 2012 yet. I doubt Romney would sink the loot into it again…he spent so much last year. He might be more vice-presidential fodder (a running mate). I think the GOP needs to go young, if it’s going to stand a chance in ‘12. It must break the mentality of being a hostile, ultra-conservative party - more moderate. It’s just a political reality right now. That’s another reason Palin would have a hard time winning.

McCain was moderate, at first, but was seen as swinging to the hard right when he tabbed Palin, and that might’ve crushed his campaign.

By James the Game on 07/05/2009 12:34 am
Nanny hasSeven
Even though people don’t like making religion an issue, it will become an issue if he runs again. Their are too many disenfranchised ex-Mormons out there, and others who are not Mormon who simply won’t trust him; especially after seeing the way the Mormon Church turned the ERA, and then Prop 8 into such fiascos with their bloc Mormon vote, dictated to them from their Church general authorities on how they were to vote. He will surely receive more support in the western states where there’s a higher concentration of Mormons. Americans need to read up and investigate the history of this church and how it still operates today before you consider Mitt Romney as a serious candidate. As a former Mormon, I recommend reading The God Makers by Ed Decker & Dave Hunt. Then read The Mormon Conspiracy by Charles Wood, then top it off with a very real account Leaving the Saints by Martha Beck, a widely published Psychologist who writes for "O"magazine. There is suppose to be a separation of church and state, but that’s not how Mormon authorities do things. In Utah, the General Authorities from the church meet on a regular basis with the Mormon politicians (i.e. Orrin Hatch) to make sure their politics agree with church doctrine. Separation of church and state? Not by a long shot.
By Nanny hasSeven on 07/05/2009 1:32 am
Kelly In Texas

Nanny….I have often wondered about that. I do not know much about the Mormon religion, but it did seem to me that many voters were put off by it.

Thank you for the book titles, I would like to read about this subject.

However, I do not think that his religious preference has much to do with his being President. Unless Obama has totally torn our country to bits and made our constitition null and void…I don’t think that there is much worry about Romney running policy throught the Mormon church.

But…I will read up on this and pay close attention to what Romney has done in the past. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.

By Kelly In Texas on 07/05/2009 2:35 pm
georgia fatwood
KIT…"put off by..?..Yeah, like the laying on hands by a witch doctor…..That was nightmarish….
By georgia fatwood on 07/05/2009 9:46 pm
C jay

Yes, you are absolutely correct, Nanny. And the GA of the church have had a long term plan to put an LDA member in as many CEO  positions as possible (General Mills, Delta, Ryder, etc - naming only a few I’ve known of) to take over politics in the U.S. It is a highly organized effort - and Mitt is one of their boys. I have heard about another comer, Michael Medved, so I’m waiting to see him dawn on this "scene," more… but he’s out there. It is all scary, frankly. I have no idea why a church would engage in such activities.

On the other hand, having known GR, Mitt is certainly not able to be his father, by a long shot - he simply hasn’t got George’s stuff.

 

By C jay on 07/05/2009 5:02 pm
Marjorie C.

James:  …don’t jump into the fire, if you don’t want your feet burned

LOL.  Wait until the fires start building for Obama.  Do you think he’ll survive it?  I don’t.  I think he’ll walk away.

By Marjorie C. on 07/05/2009 5:34 am
James the Game
Marj, I’m not a crystal ball kind of guy. We could be in a war with North Korea by this time next year.
By James the Game on 07/05/2009 10:39 am
Star Lawrence
How about today—I think Kim Jong Il is lobbing missiles today. Obama is off to Russia for some soul-peering, I guess.
By Star Lawrence on 07/05/2009 1:26 pm
James the Game
When isn’t Kim Jong Very-Ill lobbing missiles?
By James the Game on 07/05/2009 2:44 pm
C jay
(good for you, James)
By C jay on 07/05/2009 5:03 pm
Marjorie C.

Maggie:   She made Sanford’s rambling oratory seem like a Shakespearean soliloquy.

My guess is that she doesn’t have a speechwriter, and I didn’t notice any teleprompters either.  The reason why Obama sounds so slick all the time is because his words are always prepared ahead of time…  although for some, even that is beginning to grow stale. 

By Marjorie C. on 07/05/2009 5:31 am
georgia fatwood
Dear Marjorie.. When did having speechwriters became the tragic moral flaw you’re harping on? (..that would be .."on which one harps"…if I had a speechwriter…) Teleprompters?….the root of all evil? Patently absurd. 
By georgia fatwood on 07/05/2009 6:24 am