Politics | 03/23/2009 11:05 am
Bill O'Reilly Producer 'Ambushes' Female Reporter

Journalist Amanda Terkel has something to say to Bill O’Reilly and his Fox News team: "Leave me alone."
It seems Terkel inflamed O’Reilly’s ire earlier this month when she highlighted some of his contentious comments on rape, like when he suggested last year that 18-year-old Jennifer Moore, who was raped and murdered, would still be alive had she not been walking the streets while drunk. Terkel’s commentary came in reaction to news that O’Reilly would be addressing the Alexa Foundation, a group that helps rape victims.
Though Terkel didn’t openly criticize O’Reilly, the newsman apparently took offense, because one of his producers, Jesse Watters, accosted her during a weekend vacation, writes Terkel at Think Progress. In addition to "ambushing" her outside of her hotel, Watters, according to Terkel, took a decidedly aggressive stance:
Watters immediately began asking me why I was causing ‘pain and suffering’ to the Alexa Foundation. He never gave me the context for his questions. Confused, I repeatedly asked him what he was talking about and whether he could refresh my memory, but he just continued shouting his question.
Upset over the encounter, Terkel contacted Fox News’s media-relations wing, but has yet to receive an apology — or even a response. She concludes her post by taking explicit aim at O’Reilly:
O’Reilly should offer an apology/explanation of why, when a woman is raped and murdered, it’s relevant what she was wearing or how much she was drinking. O’Reilly never asked me for a statement nor invited me on his show before sending Watters to harass me. Since I’m a five-foot, 100-pound woman with an opinion that he doesn’t like, perhaps O’Reilly believes I deserve to be treated this way.
Well, knowing O’Reilly, we’re sure he’ll use his show to explain — or at least defend — himself.























83 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I used to really enjoy watching Bill O’reilly’s show, but his actions completely turn me off these days. He is so rude to most guests, especially women, I think he is very condescending to his woman guests. He acts like they are just to stupid for words. He needs to get a reality check about himself and quit being such a loud know it all!!!
DeBurca
This story has been taken totally out of context. Miss Terkel slammed O’Reilly about a quote from him that she picked up on one of the sites and did not research and read the whole interview, part of it had to do with an interview with Mel Gibson and his drinking. She hadn’t even read the whole interview, took a couple of sentences, and then wrote her piece. Consequently, it went out all over the internet and fueled major resentment towards O’Reilly.
Now fast forward to what this story is really about - there was a young woman brutally raped at knife point in her apartment or dorm while she was in college. They caught and convicted the guy. This young woman, in order to heal, began a foundation to help rape victims.
O’Reilly has contributed to the support of that foundation and he was asked to speak at a conference they were having. Miss Terkel’s article spurred a group of protestors to harass and protest the rape victim. They protested her conference and harassed her family constantly to the point of incredible stress on this young woman who was only trying the help rape victims. Miss Terkel’s actions resulted in cyber bullying and harassment of a rape victim.
Bill O’Reilly is egotistical and bombastic, but he is not always wrong. I don’t know his whole quote that Terkel used, but it resulted in harassment of a rape victim. He is always on the forefront against child abuse and pedophiles and rapists, contributing hundreds of thousands of dollars. I know he goes for the drama in his news stories, but worse is MediaMatters, they lie all the time.
He has said many times the he thinks Pres Obama is brilliant, doesn’t agree with him, but after he’d interviewed him someone asked him do you think he can do the job, and he said yes - live on the air. He is not always what you think he is.
Yes someone from Fox News confronted Miss Terkel, and he was aggressive in his questions, and she seemed rather dull and clueless - another reporter who doesn’t know how to do their homework - they believe it is memorizing something and not do any real thinking, rather like a child. They are screwed up with what to think and not "how to" think or reason.
Pi
I agree, I think they all need to cut it out. Miss Terkel had a gentleman with her. It was daylight and they approached her with a marked mike and camera. I don’t know how much she was stalked or approached. It looked like they were waiting as she walked to or from her hotel. It was confrontational and I don’t like it from either side.
Miss Terkel’s actions led to Alexa and her parents, of the Alexa foundation being stalked and harassed by several people, and having been brutally raped, it was way off way off the mark of reasonable reaction. She began hiding in her home because of Miss Terkel’s call to action (so to speak) against Bill O’Reilly. They harassed her instead of O’Reilly. I suspect Fox News was doing what was done to Alexa. I think it is wrong on both counts. They should all knock it off. The aggressive and confrontational political atmosphere that the internet has given birth to reminds me of the 1969 Cultural Revolution in China. It destroyed a whole generation of people.
It appears to me that she wrote an article that put a bad light on the organization that Bill was supporting and doing a speech for…..what she failed to do was think about the consequences of the orgaization that helps woman by advertising her hate for Bill
She says…
" Our post — which never criticized the Alexa Foundation — highlighted the fact that in the past, O’Reilly has implied that women who dress in a certain way or consume too much alcohol should perhaps expect to be raped. Here is what he said on his radio show on Aug. 2 about Jennifer Moore, an 18-year-old woman who was raped and murdered:
O’Reilly’s comments about Moore were part of a larger segment about the dangers of drunkenness. His other example was Mel Gibson going on a drunken tirade and yelling anti-Semitic comments. “I think it’s safe to say that if Mel Gibson didn’t get drunk, he wouldn’t be in this terrible situation he finds himself in,” said O’Reilly. “And if a young woman, 18-year-old Jennifer Moore of Harrington Park, NJ, didn’t get drunk, she’d be alive today.”
Just by making the statement she associated the Foundation for their hate for Bill and twisted his words to make her point!
His comments were a suggestion to woman that being blind drunk, dressed in provacative clothing and walking a street in the wee hours of the morning increases your chances of an attack!
I agree…..!!
His motive was to have woman avoid putting themselves in that situation!
L.C
Terkel’s group was stalking and harassing a rape victim and her family because, after his support of their foundation, Bill O’Reilly was invited to speak, so they confronted Miss Terkel, and now she will become famous.
Terkel’s followers should have been protesting Bill O’Reilly outside his offices. You don’t know the whole story and there is much more to it than is presented here.
If you are honored to speak for rape and murder victims then you should talk to O’Reilly, he works on that all the time. He supports many groups that support victims. He is conservative, egotistical and bombastic, but he puts his money where his mouth is.
I can’t believe the editorial license of the Wow staff. Did you guys even find out more info on this story, or do you just want controversy that has little to do with the whole story. Is this due to the limited nature of your vision?
It’s not blaming the victim. No one is saying she "deserved" to be raped or killed. However, there are certain actions that are unwise and often lead to danger. To ignore that fact — which is what it is, a fact — is to refuse to look reality in the face, and thereby endanger more people. Again, we can say that a person has a right to dress and behave anyway they like without fear of such a terrible crime; that is absolutely true; but, if everyone in this world respected everyone else’s rights, we would not have criminals. Clearly, there are people who will gladly violate another’s rights, in very awful ways. That poor girl was a victim of one of those people. It was not — NOT — her fault. She *was* the victim. But she made poor and avoidable choices, and, sadly, some dirt bag took advantage of that oppurtunity to harm and murder her.
If an innocent child walks alone after dark in the forest where a man-eating tiger lives, and the tiger eats the child, the tiger is the guilty party. But it would have been wiser for the child *not* to walk alone after dark where a man-eating tiger lives, because it is dangerous to do so. That does not mean the child deserved to get eaten; it does not mean what happened was right.
L. C. : Jennifer Moore had every right to wear whatever she wanted to, regardless of the hour without the fear of being raped and murdered!
Yes she did, but was it wise of her to do so. A little common sense goes a long ways. The guy lurking around campuses doesn’t give a damn about your rights. No one is blaming the victim, but if someone wants to swim with sharks, they are taking some severe risks. It was risky behavior. She overlooked the risk.
Sj…I get the point you were trying to make when you said "dressed in provacative clothing and walking a street in the wee hours of the morning increases your chances of an attack"…I was in just that situation. In my younger days, I was leaving a club and I was dressed, had on knee high boots, short mini skirt, midrif top and I had to walk to my car alone, 3 blocks. I was heckled and followed by two guys, they were drunk, I was not. I finally turned around & stood my ground to them and they backed off, but in doing so I left myself wide open for an attack. After that night I knew the clothes I wore and being alone at 2am was not safe. Predators look for girls just like that…the less clothes she has on the less they have to get through, the later it is in the night they assume she had been drinking and is drunk, so easier target. Is it the girls fault, NO, but sometimes we have to be a litte more aware of what we are wearing and where we are…
Its sad others cant see the point you were trying to make.