Aung San Suu Kyi Update | 05/14/2009 10:45 am
'Wretched American' May Ruin Hopes for House Arrest Release of Aung San Suu Kyi (Video)

Myanmar’s pro-democracy leader and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Aung San Suu Kyi, may have to spend even more time under house arrest after an American swam a mile across a lake to her home.
"Everyone is very angry with this wretched American. He is the cause of all these problems. He’s a fool," said Suu Kyi’s chief lawyer, Kyi Win.
John William Yettaw swam to her compound May 3 and was arrested two days later on his way back. Suu Kyi has spent 13 of the last 20 years under house arrest, and she was supposed to finally be freed May 27. She will go on trial for the illegal visitor on Monday; if convicted, she could face up to five years in prison. Police this morning whisked away Suu Kyi and two women who live with her and brought her to the notorious Insein Prison, where human-rights groups say torture is common.
Western leaders condemned the new charges. The United States said it was "troubling," and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has asked for more information. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he is "deeply disturbed" about the new charges.
"The Burmese regime is clearly intent on finding any pretext, no matter how tenuous, to extend her unlawful detention," Brown said. "If the 2010 elections are to have any semblance of credibility, she and all political prisoners must be freed to participate."
In 1988, Suu Kyi was named secretary general of the National League for Democracy (NLD), and called for an end to the military rule established in a 1962 coup. She was put under house arrest in July 1989 for "endangering the state." The NLD party won the 1990 election but Myanmar’s military rulers essentially ignored the results. Suu Kyi remains the world’s only jailed Nobel laureate.
Here’s video of the latest report on Suu Ky:























24 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
face up to five years in prison.
And the Dems worry about what the world will think of our past waterboarding of an occasional terrorist? World opinion. We have to set the standards for the treatment of detainees. Like who in the world cares and who’s watching?
MK: In your world, one only acts ethically if someone is watching?
The point I was making is that in a world that will hold a person under house arrest for 13 to 20 years for her political beliefs, America should not be concerned about what the world thinks of our lapse in judgement regarding our military practices in 2003 after being frightfully attacked by terrorists.
But I think you knew that.
MK: If we become like our enemies, we might as well join them.
Odd thing to say, but carry on… we all have an opinion.
Marjorie….the point should be that no one else "plays by the rules" that premise is more than gullible. "Lapse of judgement’? I think not.
20 -40 sec under the supervision of medical personnel….and they walk away without ANY severe pain or injury. All to help gather intelligence from 3 terrorist that saved American lives? That is a lapse of judgement? I think not. It is a ridiculous idealistic standard that we have set against our own best interests.
Not a lapse in judgement, a useful Interrogation technique.
These freakin terrorist were not army combatant that some army field manual covers. Neither does the Geneva convention.
So if they want those protections then I suggest that they wear a uniform, declare war and fight on a battlefield like our soliders who deserve that protection..
Real torture DeBurca…not the 20-40 sec. of medically supervised interrogation that they walk away from without any severe pain or injury.
Real torture. They watch us and laugh…knowing that we are just hurting ourselves by our Pollyanna stance of real life.
News flash for well-intentioned but clueless freedom activists: foreign countries are sovereign and the US Constitution does not apply. Numerous US and British activists have been arrested there in recent years for distributing pro-democracy leaflets, and all that does is make things worse for the locals, and adds a burden to our embassies there.