Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Candice Bergen | 05/08/2009 7:00 am

Candice Bergen on Edwards Affair

Candice Bergen
I have to say I agree with Joan on Elizabeth Edwards. The woman has terminal cancer for Christ’s sake and three kids and has been married to someone she describes as a good man for many years. The sleaze in this is, of course, John, but Rielle Hunter — who came up with that ridiculous name herself by the bye; her name used to be something entirely other and she gives women a black eye. We all know the type, they make your hair go all weird and your teeth chatter. They are utterly amoral, without a shred of conscience and tough as tacks. But I seem to have veered off message here. I also, like Joan, question her writing a book but till I read some of it, I’ll hold off on blathering on about it. She is a remarkable woman and I am very sorry she has had so much to endure. Including a husband who is dumb enough to be sucked in by an ambitious cooze. 

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

albert miller
It’s obvious that Edwards had faced a sexual drought, and was not a play-around.
By albert miller on 05/09/2009 1:26 am
Harriet Shoebridge
John Edwards was faced with a … what??? … ‘sexual drought’ … ah-h-h-h-h … poor baby …
By Harriet Shoebridge on 05/09/2009 5:24 am
Andrea Brandon
Yes, it was totally suspicious when she decided to stay on the campaign trail with him in spite of being on her deathbed [so the press would have you believe] when any other "dying"  mother of small children would have wanted to spend her "last days" with the kids. It was all so fishy then and frankly all the Glade air freshener hasn’t really done much for the odor.
By Andrea Brandon on 05/09/2009 1:29 am
Harriet Shoebridge
I took a look at the Edwards photo (on the Liz Smith site?) and would think that John Edwards is your standard pretty charmer who has long been accustomed to getting his way and that she, Elizabeth, has long smiled her way past her husband’s indiscretions.  I suggest a history of indiscretions because no one, save the purely innocent … excluding all politicians … would choose what Ms.Bergen has so wonderfully ascribed as an ‘ambitious cooze.’  This time ‘round, again, going for the history angle, John Edwards trolled too deep and came up with … well … and given his catch of the day, bad timing (the wife with cancer and honest to god…), and that wife’s anger signalled in the tell-all … well, again … the public is treated to the spectacle of the forgiven adulterer and his very sick and forgiving wife.  I’m typing this while looking at pictures of Carrie Prejean, Miss California, who is the female version of charming and pretty and everything-coming-my-way, that is, those people to whom the world does not say ‘no’ … and imagine her surprise when consternation was expressed re. past nude pictures … ‘what?  there’s a problem?’ … But, I digress.  Of course Elizabeth Edwards is staying by her man … she knew what she was signing up to when she married him … but, kids, this time ‘round, all that smiling and putting up comes with a tell-all …
By Harriet Shoebridge on 05/09/2009 5:22 am
Ellen Leliefeld
I agree it takes two when we’re talking infidelity but we’ve always known that men can be swayed by so little effort, that doesn’t excuse the act but again I defer to their small (other) brain. I’m more disgusted by the other women. The true sisterhood has a code of ethics that we learned early in our lives. When a man is spoken for he’s off limits to other women. There are women out there that shouldn’t be trusted and I feel sorry for them.  I agree totally with Candice, Ellen
By Ellen Leliefeld on 05/09/2009 10:06 am
Paul Masters

I think it’s incredible and unconscionable that he had this affair.  What was he thinking??  What if, just what if, he’d won the Democratic primaries, and then THIS came out?  Can you imagine what Rush and Hannity and Coulter would have done with that juicy tidbit?

BTW, "Ambitious Cooze" would be a good name for an all-girl rock band.

By Paul Masters on 05/09/2009 10:07 am
katie lady

As usual, you put it succinctly…  As a 66yr old who worked all her life on Civil Rights and other social issues, and who worked hours daily on the Kerry-Edwards campaign, I felt an enormous letdown…  

 I have admired Elizabeth for a long time.. we, here in NC, saw how this couple worked tirelessly on issues that meant a lot to their late son’s memory.

By katie lady on 05/09/2009 10:10 am
nan rae
Well, I bit again and Googled ‘cooze’ which turned out to be a perfect word but really, can’t we get away from all this National Enquirer stuff?
By nan rae on 05/09/2009 5:03 pm
Chrome Toe
Okay yes I loved the "cooze" comment. cracks me up. but come on people. the guy didn’t get "sucked" in or suckered or victimized. My best friend and I used to talk about how easy it was to tell which married men were willing to play the game. In my twenties and thirties when i was a "hottie". you know..THAT age… I could be in the presence of a married man for ten minutes and know if he was willing to screw around. NOT that i did! i’ve never had an affair in my life. Like my best friend says… I’m not "subtle enough". but cooze or not. The guy had to be willing. and most likely he put out the willing vibe early on. that’s what kept the cooze coming back you know…
By Chrome Toe on 05/09/2009 5:52 pm
albert miller
We all know it"s pretty hard for a woman to get a guy interested in sex. Just try to get him interested in loving you.
By albert miller on 05/10/2009 1:07 am
Janna S.
John Edwards always seemed to grandstand his marriage through out all his bids for elected office.  It seemed awkward to me personally.  I just never liked him.  I liked his political ideals only.  My gut feeling that Edwards has done this before and Elisabeth was just was not aware.  I feel sad for her.
By Janna S. on 05/11/2009 2:01 am
Kitty Champagne
What educated, intelligent and honest woman finds out her husband has
had (and probably, which photos showed he was) still cheating?
But then agrees to join him in a political campaign for the office of
President?
She stood on podiums, before TV cameras, on TV and radio shows
speaking in interviews and spouted how Wonderful he is as a husband
and father, how honest and caring he is as a human being, how he’d
make the Best man for the job of running our country and standing as
a leader in the free world.  DUH?
In my opinion she is just as dishonest, unreliable, unbelievable and
two-faced as he is.  This book and both of their actions are an
insult and offensive to the gullible public which trusted them, gave
them their votes and donated money to help them on that quest in
politics and the ultimate goal… the White House.
I no longer feel sorry for her, except for her health issue.  She
chose to stand by him and lie for him.  I wouldn’t pay one penny for
this book, nor watch her as she sits on all the talk shows like
Oprah, etc… to shill it.
When he told her he wanted to run and for her to be involved in the
sham act of the happy, honest, loyal and loving couple/family man….

Why didn’t she refuse?  What ever happened to saying… *Hell, no
John.  That’s dishonest and I won’t do it.  Count me out.* 
That would have put the brakes on the whole thing and perhaps kept
their family and dirty secret from becoming public knowledge.  Didn’t
they even think of trying to do that to protect their 3 children from
the potential fallout?
BOTH have dirty-hands in my book and should be ashamed to write
books, make speeches and go back to curry favor and monies for their
works.   
By Kitty Champagne on 05/29/2009 1:27 pm
Kathleen Lowe
Candice is so right. It’s sad but there are women out there who are totally amoral and will poach a husband or boyfriend.  Rielle the hunter is a poacher.
By Kathleen Lowe on 05/31/2009 9:06 pm
Jane F
What a fabulous woman Candice is.  She has beauty, intelligence, talent, and the courage to rightly call Rielle Hunter a cooze.  It was music to my ears to finally hear someone call it like it is.  The other names used to describe RH were just not quite enough — cooze is perfection.
By Jane F on 06/01/2009 1:47 pm
Jane F
Considering all this new agey spiritual crap Rielle Fortune Hunter is involved in, I suspect she is terrified of the bad karma she has developed.  So glad I’m not her!
By Jane F on 06/01/2009 1:52 pm