Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Condoleezza Rice, Torture | 05/04/2009 11:05 am

Condoleezza Rice: Bush Would 'Do Nothing' Illegal on Terror Interrogations (Video)

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
YouTube

Former President Bush’s most loyal confidantes are still saying they did nothing illegal when it came to interrogation techniques used on terror suspects.

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Sunday said despite those who claim otherwise, Bush never would have approved anything illegal, no matter how big a threat the nation faced in the wake of 9/11.

"He was also very clear that we would do nothing — nothing — that was against the law or against our obligations internationally," Rice said during remarks at The Jewish Day School in Washington, reports CNN. "And so, the president was only willing to authorize policies that were legal in order to protect the country. And I hope people understand that it was a struggle, it was a difficult time," she continued. "We were all terrified of another attack on this country because September 11 was the worst day of my life in government — watching 3,000 Americans die because these people attacked us."

The Senate Intelligence Committee last month released a report saying Rice was among top Bush advisers who approved the CIA’s use of waterboarding on a select few terror suspects.

Meanwhile, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-VT, is still pushing for a so-called "truth commission" to find out exactly where the pressure came from to use such enhanced techniques on detainees. In an editorial in The Boston Globe over the weekend, Leahy blasted unnamed Bush officials who "continue to use fear tactics to resist the Obama administration’s effort to restore America’s standing in the word," and said it is "appalling" that the Justice Department was used to "contort our laws on subjects as serious as torture."

Watch Rice’s comments on interrogations below:

156 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

S.J. Morgan
I Believe her! 
By S.J. Morgan on 05/04/2009 11:15 am
S G
PLEASE! WATER BOARDING IS ILLEGAL IN AMERICA AND INTERNATIONALLY! A little scared there Condi?
By S G on 05/04/2009 11:22 am
Kelly In Texas

Condi is one of the best examples of women that have found respect, power and a place in National and International prominence. I value her honesty and information, I thank her for her work on our behalf. She is an inspiration.

I believe that her word will be unimpeachable.

Waterboarding  as of 2002 was done under strict new guidelines of 20-40 second time limits, under the supervision of medial personnel so that no severe pain or injury either mental or physical was inflicted.

 

By Kelly In Texas on 05/04/2009 3:07 pm
deber B

Kelly, you hit on all the pistons with your well informed post.   I know people, personally, who have been waterboarded.  It was "no big deal."  

The democrats are using the waterboarding issue, which by the way hasn’t been used since 2003, as another way to discredit President Bush and the republicans.   Once this issue has been buried I’m sure they have 3 or 4 more up their sleeves.

Obama needs to get on with his leadership role.   His ratings are slowly going down and the stimulus and bank bailouts haven’t worked.  

Creating diversions…..still campaigning instead of leading.

By deber B on 05/04/2009 3:29 pm
Kelly In Texas

Deber, I am most upset with the Obama political machine for using good intentioned Americans that gave him their trust, and throwing them under the bus . They are just votes to be used as a mob mentality so that he can push through his own plans. Plans that had nothing to do with the campaign promises.

Even that poor woman, Henrietta Hughs that made National news when she asked Obama for help during a rally, has been pushed to the side. Oh…ya…he made a big deal out helping her while the camers were rolling. But some private citizen gave her a house to live in and now she is being evicted. Where oh where is her savior Obama now? She is old news and no longer important.

He is a user and will stop at nothing.

By Kelly In Texas on 05/04/2009 5:20 pm
DeBúrca obj

This is why an investigation will be so good for America. All the facts will come out and it will be no more of this speculation based upon snippets of information and heresay.

And considering Rice is implicated, she is really not a good source. We need an investigation. 

By DeBúrca obj on 05/04/2009 11:40 am
S G
I agree 100%
By S G on 05/04/2009 11:44 am
Tee Zee

I’m hoping for an actual "truth commision" to determine exactly where the pressure came from to use such desperate techniques on detainees. In addition, I want to know what the Justice Department’s role in contorting our laws to justify such abuse of human rights has been.

To many government commisions have been a wash of the actual facts to concile the guilty. 

By Tee Zee on 05/04/2009 11:44 am
Mary Quite-Contrary
Truth Commission? Help us all…here comes a Truth Czar. How much destruction of our intelligence community is needed to appease? Really…this is getting dangerous. Let’s “out” all covert agents (and their methodology) to play a game of uberLeft “gotcha.” Welcome to a September 10 worldview, via Kumbaya political ideology, in a September 12 world. Political jockeying has real world ramifications…and real Americans can wind up dead. This is fool hardy on so many levels.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 05/04/2009 2:46 pm
Kelly In Texas

Mary…that there are ANY "Czar’s" is very, very telling. These Czars have only to answer to Obama…they are not reponsible to the same guidelines that other appointed officials are.

Why does anyone think that this is OK in America?

By Kelly In Texas on 05/06/2009 9:17 am
f p
And those legal opinions by Feith, Bybee and Yoo? Spurious at best and downright illegal to begin with according to law experts I’ve read.  Sounds to me like Condi is attempting to justify the unjustifiable and her roll in this illegality.
By f p on 05/04/2009 11:45 am
deber B

During wartime, the constitution gives the president the power to fight with any resources Congress makes available. The executive is expected to do what it takes to protect the nation.

The Patriot Act offers a case in point. In the wake of 9/11, Congress and the administration decided the law was necessary and reasonable. Four years later, they revisited their decision. Some provisions were modified. Some additional oversight measures were added. And lawmakers reauthorized the law. That’s the way the system should work.

This is the same approach the president and the Congress should take to administer the National Security Agency’s surveillance program that intercepts communications between possible terrorists and U.S. persons.

George Bush and his administration did nothing wrong.   They had all of the checks and balances in place.    They had extensive legal advice.    We have not waterboarded since 2003.    If our present administration feels a need to make adjustments,  make them and move on.

By deber B on 05/04/2009 12:43 pm
By deber B on 05/04/2009 11:51 am
f p
There were very few checks and balances in fact.  And the constitution does not give the president the right to condone torture. The congress to my knowledge did not condone this brutality; the OLC wrote opinions that Bush and Cheney wanted in order to torture. 
By f p on 05/04/2009 3:09 pm
deber B

There are far worse methods of interrogation than waterboarding.   Our military trains their own in waterboarding.   We will soon be informed with information that will show that President Bush gained valuable information from this technique as well as other forms of interrogation that kept our country safe.  

Can’t put a price on human lives on our home land.

By deber B on 05/04/2009 3:22 pm
f p
Name one? Have you ever experienced it? Have you ever experienced drowning?  You really are attempting to justify the unjustifiable Deber. "Can’t put a price on human lives on our home land." But human life in other countries just doesn’t count in your universe eh?  Unbelievable>
By f p on 05/04/2009 3:47 pm