Condoleezza Rice, Torture | 05/04/2009 11:05 am
Condoleezza Rice: Bush Would 'Do Nothing' Illegal on Terror Interrogations (Video)

Former President Bush’s most loyal confidantes are still saying they did nothing illegal when it came to interrogation techniques used on terror suspects.
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Sunday said despite those who claim otherwise, Bush never would have approved anything illegal, no matter how big a threat the nation faced in the wake of 9/11.
"He was also very clear that we would do nothing — nothing — that was against the law or against our obligations internationally," Rice said during remarks at The Jewish Day School in Washington, reports CNN. "And so, the president was only willing to authorize policies that were legal in order to protect the country. And I hope people understand that it was a struggle, it was a difficult time," she continued. "We were all terrified of another attack on this country because September 11 was the worst day of my life in government — watching 3,000 Americans die because these people attacked us."
The Senate Intelligence Committee last month released a report saying Rice was among top Bush advisers who approved the CIA’s use of waterboarding on a select few terror suspects.
Meanwhile, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-VT, is still pushing for a so-called "truth commission" to find out exactly where the pressure came from to use such enhanced techniques on detainees. In an editorial in The Boston Globe over the weekend, Leahy blasted unnamed Bush officials who "continue to use fear tactics to resist the Obama administration’s effort to restore America’s standing in the word," and said it is "appalling" that the Justice Department was used to "contort our laws on subjects as serious as torture."
Watch Rice’s comments on interrogations below:























156 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Condi is one of the best examples of women that have found respect, power and a place in National and International prominence. I value her honesty and information, I thank her for her work on our behalf. She is an inspiration.
I believe that her word will be unimpeachable.
Waterboarding as of 2002 was done under strict new guidelines of 20-40 second time limits, under the supervision of medial personnel so that no severe pain or injury either mental or physical was inflicted.
Kelly, you hit on all the pistons with your well informed post. I know people, personally, who have been waterboarded. It was "no big deal."
The democrats are using the waterboarding issue, which by the way hasn’t been used since 2003, as another way to discredit President Bush and the republicans. Once this issue has been buried I’m sure they have 3 or 4 more up their sleeves.
Obama needs to get on with his leadership role. His ratings are slowly going down and the stimulus and bank bailouts haven’t worked.
Creating diversions…..still campaigning instead of leading.
Deber, I am most upset with the Obama political machine for using good intentioned Americans that gave him their trust, and throwing them under the bus . They are just votes to be used as a mob mentality so that he can push through his own plans. Plans that had nothing to do with the campaign promises.
Even that poor woman, Henrietta Hughs that made National news when she asked Obama for help during a rally, has been pushed to the side. Oh…ya…he made a big deal out helping her while the camers were rolling. But some private citizen gave her a house to live in and now she is being evicted. Where oh where is her savior Obama now? She is old news and no longer important.
He is a user and will stop at nothing.
This is why an investigation will be so good for America. All the facts will come out and it will be no more of this speculation based upon snippets of information and heresay.
And considering Rice is implicated, she is really not a good source. We need an investigation.
I’m hoping for an actual "truth commision" to determine exactly where the pressure came from to use such desperate techniques on detainees. In addition, I want to know what the Justice Department’s role in contorting our laws to justify such abuse of human rights has been.
To many government commisions have been a wash of the actual facts to concile the guilty.
Mary…that there are ANY "Czar’s" is very, very telling. These Czars have only to answer to Obama…they are not reponsible to the same guidelines that other appointed officials are.
Why does anyone think that this is OK in America?
During wartime, the constitution gives the president the power to fight with any resources Congress makes available. The executive is expected to do what it takes to protect the nation.
The Patriot Act offers a case in point. In the wake of 9/11, Congress and the administration decided the law was necessary and reasonable. Four years later, they revisited their decision. Some provisions were modified. Some additional oversight measures were added. And lawmakers reauthorized the law. That’s the way the system should work.
This is the same approach the president and the Congress should take to administer the National Security Agency’s surveillance program that intercepts communications between possible terrorists and U.S. persons.
George Bush and his administration did nothing wrong. They had all of the checks and balances in place. They had extensive legal advice. We have not waterboarded since 2003. If our present administration feels a need to make adjustments, make them and move on.
By deber B on 05/04/2009 12:43 pmThere are far worse methods of interrogation than waterboarding. Our military trains their own in waterboarding. We will soon be informed with information that will show that President Bush gained valuable information from this technique as well as other forms of interrogation that kept our country safe.
Can’t put a price on human lives on our home land.