Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Cynthia McFadden | 10/16/2009 3:30 pm

Madame Secretary, by Cynthia McFadden

Photo courtesy of ABC

It was a confident, relaxed and very focused Hillary Clinton I met up with in Moscow this week, her first trip to Russia since becoming secretary of state. She was there to help – as she calls it, "restart" – the relationship between the two super-powers. The relationship had become increasingly rocky during the final years of the Bush administration.

"I will be the first to tell you," she said to students at Moscow State University, "that we have people in our government and you have people in your government who are still living in the past … They do not believe the United States and Russia can cooperate to this extent. They do not trust each other and we have to prove them wrong. That is our goal."

On her agenda with the Russians: Iran, Afghanistan and missile defense. She expressed satisfaction with her closed-door meetings and told me she believes the Russians will support sanctions against Iran if there is proof that the Iranians are developing nuclear weapons.

Click here to see a video clip of this interview on "Nightline’s" website.  

While emphasizing the improvement in understanding between the two nations and urging mutual respect, she did not shrink from directly confronting areas of concern. She attacked head-on the thorny issue of human rights: "People must be free to take unpopular positions, disagree with conventional wisdom, know they are safe to peacefully challenge accepted practice and authority," she said at Moscow State. "That’s why attacks on journalists and human-rights defenders here in Russia is such a great concern, because it is a threat to progress."

Clinton is the only secretary of state in the past 60 years, besides Ed Muskie, who comes from a political background. Sometimes that helps, she told me. "I think it gives me a perspective. I’m able to put myself in the position of the leaders. Obviously in some settings it’s easier than others. But if you’re an elected leader, you have to care about politics, so when I’m talking to someone I can say I’m not a bureaucrat, I come from a political world, so I understand that this is hard, but here’s how we can do it."

Clinton appears to have an endless reserve of energy for a truly grueling schedule. She routinely begins her days before seven o’clock AM and ends them long after midnight. Veteran state department officials in Moscow told me they had never seen a more ambitious series of meetings in a shorter period of time. Consider Tuesday: a meeting with the Russian foreign minister, a series of meetings at the U.S. Ambassador’s residence, a meeting with officials at Boeing, a meeting with the Russian president and, as if that wasn’t enough, the opera. We joined her for the first two acts but we slipped out at intermission. Clinton hung in there until the bitter end.

I spent a good deal of time with Clinton during the campaign last year but have never seen her, well, dare I say it, quite so happy. There is a certain ease about her – an openness that was often missing in the past. We commiserated about what a pain it is to get your hair looking right on the road; she joked about having vodka shots "for America" at lunch with the foreign minister. She was, it seemed to me – in the midst of all the pressure of her job – relaxed. For this super-charged intellectual, Iowa was tougher than Moscow. Maybe it’s the difference between "running" for office and governing. Maybe it is simply a new stage of life for her.

58 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

deber B

You go, Hillary!!   I have to admit, I believe she has aged quite a bit since her campaign and becoming Secretary of State….those dreaded bags under the eyes!!   If I were Hillary, I’d take a few weeks off soon and have that little surgery done!   What long days for her!   I don’t know how she does it but she does seem energized by it all.  

Sorry, folks, but she would’ve made a much better President than Obama….she has her faults the same as everyone else but she is decisive and would not have been  wreckless in spending the taxpayer’s money.     The democrats made a huge mistake knocking Hillary off the block to make way for Obama….look at her now!!

Oh, that hindsight is, indeed, 20/20!

By deber B on 10/16/2009 3:14 pm
Glenda Glynn
deber — Wasn’t there a poll somewhere that showed that Hillary was more favored now than Obama?  Can’t remember where I saw it.
By Glenda Glynn on 10/16/2009 7:24 pm
Patricia Sprofera
Glenda Glynn - I remember seeing the results of the poll, that you’re referring to, on 10.15.09., during "The Lou Dobbs Program," on CNN.
By Patricia Sprofera on 10/17/2009 1:44 am
deber B
Yes, Glenda Glynn, there is a recent poll that puts her popularity above Obama’s.   Not sure what all of that means since Obama is being judged by the American people on several levels.   It would appear that Hillary has tremendous confidence while focusing on international affairs.   She is no doubt an intelligent experienced woman when it comes to politics and her ability to make quick assessments and follow through with a plan.   I would not have voted for her because of left agenda but I still admire her overall strength as a woman, a wife and a mother.   I would still like to see her go in to have her upper and lower eyelids done….but would hope that she doesn’t use Nancy Pelosi’s plastic surgeon!
By deber B on 10/17/2009 6:23 am
Patricia Sprofera
deber B - I, too think the democrats were wrong to put their full measure and weight behind the then U.S. Senator Obama.  The Secretary of State would have been more of a "decider," than President Obama.  As I’ve previously posted on this, and other sites, regarding our current Secretary of State: "If not the White House - then the World."
By Patricia Sprofera on 10/17/2009 1:39 am
Baby  Snooks
The very last thing this country needed a year ago was another "decider" given the mess created by the previous one. 
By Baby Snooks on 10/17/2009 5:03 am
Smarterthan That
And now, Obama has made sure to marginalize her. So, put a fork in her, she’s done.
By Smarterthan That on 10/18/2009 9:32 pm
Baby  Snooks
She wasn’t what some of us wanted. Or still want to be honest. Some of us have never liked her. Or ever will.  Mainly because of him. 
By Baby Snooks on 10/16/2009 3:45 pm
Maggie W

I didn’t always like Hillary.  I remember her all knowing attitude when she tried to push her secretive health care reform through Congress.  I also remember her overly ambitious days ( "We are the President").

I believe she would have made a fine President, but her campaign was a train wreck in motion with spending and inner fighting out of control.   President Obama had expert strategists in his corner with Axlerod and Plouffe, and that made all the difference.

Hillary has been a woman’s advocate for many years.  I also believe she is a fine Sec.of State.  As First Lady, she traveled to over 70 countries.  She is well aware of just how large a stage is this world.  She knows the mine fields very well.

Her relationship with her husband has been fodder for years.  She has faced it, chin up.  She’s not the first and won’t be the last woman to love a brilliant man who is also a hound dog.  

By Maggie W on 10/16/2009 4:35 pm
Baby  Snooks

She’s not the first and won’t be the last woman to love a brilliant man who is also a hound dog.  

__________

Nor is she the first to stay with one because it "pays well."

By Baby Snooks on 10/16/2009 4:40 pm
Maryanne Raphael
I love Hillary and think she is doing a beautiful job even though it is probably the most difficult job in the world, even more difficult than being president.  I believe that President Clinton is a great man who is working hard for world peace and to make the world a better place.  As the last line in Some Like It Hot goes, "Nobody’s Perfect."
By Maryanne Raphael on 10/16/2009 6:03 pm
Baby  Snooks

I realize we all must make our own decisons but there is this curious double standard applied with regard to Hillary and every day on wowOwow and other sites when the subject of an abusive and adulterous husband is brought up the advice is usually to get out of the abusive relationship. And yet everyone admires Hillary, it seems, for staying in it.  She lost me, to be honest, in the beginning, with the 60 Minutes interview. It wasn’t an indiscretion.  It was a 12 year affair.

The only honest moment seemed to be her "reference" to Tammy Wynette.  She certainly was and is no Tammy Wynnette.  Tammy Wynette might have overlooked an indiscretion. A 12 year affair would have gotten him a cast iron skillet up the side of the head and then he and his clothes would have been tossed out the door. 

The Clintons have never really had a marraige. They’ve had an arrangement. Based on each others’ agendas.  Way I felt then. Way I feel now.

By Baby Snooks on 10/16/2009 6:20 pm
Maggie W

"The Clintons have never really had a marriage."

 We don’t know that.  We are not privy to that information.  After watching Bill on Hillary’s campaign trail, and seeing how red faced he became when anyone dismissed his wife in any way, I do believe these two have a very real marriage that has survived heartache only because they love each other in ways many of us cannot comprehend.   Not everyone has the same definition when it comes to marital bliss.  It’s not that simplistic.  

After so many years, this is Hillary’s time, and Bill Clinton seems to acknowledge that.  There is nothing to indicate that he ever " abused " her ; adulterous , yes, of course.  That is a given.  I believe she is becoming a great Sec. of State because she is intelligent, and she also has her husband’s ear.  Bill Clinton makes big bucks giving speeches all over the world because of his foreign policy expertise. No doubt his wife is a willing listener and quick learner.  That is how most successful marriages survive… by listening.

The question about the Clintons is, would either have succeeded without the other?  I doubt it.

By Maggie W on 10/16/2009 6:49 pm
Baby  Snooks

There is nothing to indicate that he ever " abused " her ; adulterous , yes, of course.  

_____________________________

Continuing to have affairs is emotional abuse. Much harder to deal with, by the way, than physical abuse.  Unless of course the woman simply doesn’t care.  Which apparently she doesn’t. Despite saying she did. 

By Baby Snooks on 10/16/2009 7:09 pm
Toni T
I think it’s rather sad that any person—or pair of people—who have both the brains and the fortitude to pursue a career of public service should have to make the trade-off of having the most intimate details of their personal lives examined, dissected, and endlessly speculated about by others. Particularly others who have no possible way of offering insight into that relationship. The only thing more sad, I suppose, would be to wake up every day being that person who feels it is his or her God-given right to make those speculations public.
By Toni T on 10/16/2009 7:33 pm