Cynthia McFadden | 10/16/2009 3:30 pm
Madame Secretary, by Cynthia McFadden

It was a confident, relaxed and very focused Hillary Clinton I met up with in Moscow this week, her first trip to Russia since becoming secretary of state. She was there to help – as she calls it, "restart" – the relationship between the two super-powers. The relationship had become increasingly rocky during the final years of the Bush administration.
"I will be the first to tell you," she said to students at Moscow State University, "that we have people in our government and you have people in your government who are still living in the past … They do not believe the United States and Russia can cooperate to this extent. They do not trust each other and we have to prove them wrong. That is our goal."
On her agenda with the Russians: Iran, Afghanistan and missile defense. She expressed satisfaction with her closed-door meetings and told me she believes the Russians will support sanctions against Iran if there is proof that the Iranians are developing nuclear weapons.
Click here to see a video clip of this interview on "Nightline’s" website.
While emphasizing the improvement in understanding between the two nations and urging mutual respect, she did not shrink from directly confronting areas of concern. She attacked head-on the thorny issue of human rights: "People must be free to take unpopular positions, disagree with conventional wisdom, know they are safe to peacefully challenge accepted practice and authority," she said at Moscow State. "That’s why attacks on journalists and human-rights defenders here in Russia is such a great concern, because it is a threat to progress."
Clinton is the only secretary of state in the past 60 years, besides Ed Muskie, who comes from a political background. Sometimes that helps, she told me. "I think it gives me a perspective. I’m able to put myself in the position of the leaders. Obviously in some settings it’s easier than others. But if you’re an elected leader, you have to care about politics, so when I’m talking to someone I can say I’m not a bureaucrat, I come from a political world, so I understand that this is hard, but here’s how we can do it."
Clinton appears to have an endless reserve of energy for a truly grueling schedule. She routinely begins her days before seven o’clock AM and ends them long after midnight. Veteran state department officials in Moscow told me they had never seen a more ambitious series of meetings in a shorter period of time. Consider Tuesday: a meeting with the Russian foreign minister, a series of meetings at the U.S. Ambassador’s residence, a meeting with officials at Boeing, a meeting with the Russian president and, as if that wasn’t enough, the opera. We joined her for the first two acts but we slipped out at intermission. Clinton hung in there until the bitter end.
I spent a good deal of time with Clinton during the campaign last year but have never seen her, well, dare I say it, quite so happy. There is a certain ease about her – an openness that was often missing in the past. We commiserated about what a pain it is to get your hair looking right on the road; she joked about having vodka shots "for America" at lunch with the foreign minister. She was, it seemed to me – in the midst of all the pressure of her job – relaxed. For this super-charged intellectual, Iowa was tougher than Moscow. Maybe it’s the difference between "running" for office and governing. Maybe it is simply a new stage of life for her.
























58 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
It’s not like we’re peeking through their windows. His "mistresses" always seem to invite us in. They’re both public figures. The public has a right to know. And expect. And he has always fallen below expectation. As has she.
You read what was posted about David Letterman and then you read this. Not only double standard but absolute hypocrisy.
Most of us really didn’t want or need to know about Billy Boy’s conquests. Most of us would have preferred he kept his pants zipped. At least in the Oval Office. I just really cannot believe women defending him.
To Cynthia McFadden: Congratulations for the most excellent interview you have conducted with Hillary Clinton, covering the entire range of subjects with questions to get at the core of what we - as readers - would like to know.
For Hillary, she is holding a job that requires storing a great deal of knowledge, expertise, and an ability to react and respond quickly when a conference takes an unexpected turn. I would deem it as hard as it gets, demanding brains but a stamina that few of us could compete with. Any public statement, an interview like this - even with a friend of sorts as she had here - has to be carefully worded as errors or controversial statements are quickly broadcast ‘round the world. Keeping many balls in the air as she deals with so many diverse high officials on various subjects I find an ability to be highly commended. It should make little difference is we like her or not, her handling of this difficult job deserves a huge round of applause from us all.
Thanks, Cynthia, for the great job!
The thrust of this interview - the "meat" of it - is that the job of Secretary of State in times that are far more crucial than in recent history is the most demanding, requiring stamina and intelligence that few - if any of us - could even hope to equal. It is never-ending, requiring a person fast on their feet, with the ability to no only jump from subject to subect, country to country, and remain totally confident and cool in the presence of a wide range of personalities and problems.
Those that swoop so low that a person’s past, private life, looks, come into consideration when Hillary is representing us as well as anyone could in extremely hard times should be beneath all of us — but obviously isn’t with some. Try to carry on a grueling schedule flight-hopping from country to country and anyone might have sleep deprivation and eyes that show it. Why should she "smile more"?? What has that to do with the serious job she is doing?
Let’s put it this way: would any of you who denigate Hillary in such ways like it if your neighbors and friends constantly picked you apart from the moment you left your door? I thought not. Personal attacks are not needed, not welcome and should be beneath us. Frankly, political leanings or not, we should be either silent or praising this woman for giving her all for our country in trouble.
I have found in life what comes around, goes around. Negativity, picking a person apart in a personal manner, returns to you tenfold. So thanks, Phyllis, for your positive remarks that reflect mine. Joan
Negativity is not a bad thing, it serves a purpose. How one looks often reflects how one feels and then how one is perceived by others. Hilliary should look confident, relaxed and fresh to portray the mind set of an in control leader. Think of the old commercial saying; "Don’t ever let them see you sweat".
Hilliary is in the world’s eyeview and as such, if we see it, then others can see it. Opinions will be formed and decision will be made on those assumptions. A person’s past, their private life and how they are bearing up physically are all studied and taken into consideration by other nations while they are trying to discern what steps to take in matters of world concerns.
Don’t think for one minute that they are not. Profiles are made, analysis is done, body lanuage and all is of importance.
To ignore all of that is only a feel good fairy tale that serves no purpose. This world and human nature is much more complicated than that.
Not that one needs to guess with Hilliary, she had a more than public meltdown and removed all doubt.
Hilliary threw a public tantrum that showed her lack of confidence and was quite unprofessional on the world stage. She is could not handle her marriage or life on her own and was certainly not ready to lead our country.
The sooner she is out of office the better.
Thank you Joan for your answer. Thank you Cynthia for bringing this piece to us. Thank you Hillary for being able to handle this job,
as Joan stated a very difficult job indeed.
"You go, Hillary!! I have to admit, I believe she has aged quite a bit since her campaign and becoming Secretary of State….those dreaded bags under the eyes!! If I were Hillary, I’d take a few weeks off soon and have that little surgery done!"
Really? Is that your primary interest in the Secretary of State —how much she’s aged? How petty can you get?
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0120-30.htm
Not everyone supported Hillary.