Julia Reed | 05/11/2009 9:30 am
What Elizabeth Edwards's Hairstylist Knows About John

On Friday morning I spoke to a class of graduating seniors at the all-girls Academy of the Sacred Heart in New Orleans, and I was surprised to find that one the first things they asked me was a variation on wOw’s Question of the Day. I had visited the school two years earlier, just after I’d interviewed Elizabeth Edwards for Vogue, and they wanted to know what I thought about what is going on with her now. They may be only 17, but they got right to the point: “Why in the world is she staying with her husband?” Clearly, they were mystified – and not just a little grossed out.
Theirs is a normal reaction. Last spring, when it was revealed that Eliot Spitzer, the then-governor of New York, was also Client No. 9, I ran into a woman I know at the grocery store, a woman who is several years older than I am and extremely active in the church to which we both belong. The topic of the moment was if and when Spitzer would tender his resignation. “If he were my husband, that’s not something he’d have to worry about,” she told me. “Because if he were my husband he’d be dead – I would have shot him by now.”
Silda Spitzer did not shoot her disgraced husband, just as Joan Kennedy and Hillary Clinton and Wendy Vitter and a host of other women did not shoot theirs. Not only is Eliot Spitzer still alive, Silda is still with him more than a year later, just as Lee Hart is still with Gary (they recently celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary).
I can’t explain any of these women’s actions any more than I could answer the girls’ – or wOw’s – question about Elizabeth Edwards. But I did manage a few things. First, I told the girls, as you get older, you learn never to presume that you know what goes on between any two people in a relationship, Second, the one person I would never presume to tell anything at all to, period, is Edwards, a woman whom I respect and admire and like enormously. She has been through hell, after all. Her teenage son was killed in a freak car accident. She gave birth to another daughter and a son when she was 48 and 50 years old. The first time she found out she had cancer was just after the 2004 Democratic Convention that nominated her husband for vice president; she learned that it had returned – and that it was incurable – while he was in the midst of his second campaign for the presidency. Now the whole world knows that during that same campaign he had an affair (and very likely fathered a child) with his “videographer,” Rielle Hunter, a woman who served as the model for the crazy, druggy character in Jay McInerney’s Story of My Life, as well as an even crazier, druggier character in both American Psycho
and Glamorama
by McInerney’s friend Bret Ellis. Further, her husband had given Edwards the story piecemeal, so that she would stick with him on the trail
Now she’s written a memoir, Resilience, in which she addresses the infidelity, and talked to Oprah. Meanwhile, the whole family grimly hunkers down together in the “dream house” that was built between campaigns (and illnesses) just outside of Chapel Hill, NC – the one with the big open kitchen and enormous beamed family room, the one with the barn she turned into a regulation basketball court for her self-indulgent husband. I cannot begin to imagine how it must feel to be inside that house – or her head.
























86 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Lym BO - no one thinks the information is being mean. Knowledge is a good thing.
However, there are many woman around who have Stage IV breast cancer who have survived more than ten years. It’s not the norm, but it’s not at all unheard of. Here’s the thing: most of the stats you’ll read about are based on longitudinal studies of women who did not have the advanced treatment modalities we now have. There’s good reason to be optimistic. As an MD friend told me, "If hospice hasn’t been suggested, then it’s still treatable."
Here are a few links. Important to note the dates of the papers and to always remember that each day medicine is getting smarter and smarter about how to treat various kinds of cancer. Oh yes, there have been women who have survived 19 years with Stage IV breast cancer.
This business of Edwards acknowledging that death could be "next week" is hard to take seriously, based on the way she appears and given the herculean book tour she’s got slated.
http://patient.cancerconsultants.com/CancerTreatment_Breast_Cancer.aspx?LinkId=53877
http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/8/6/514
http://www.healthcentral.com/breast-cancer/c/question/126682/61874
The links really aren’t very specific. They are more about treatment. Prognosis depends largely on what organs are effected & that info isn’t in this article. It just says mets to bone & several organs. That is not good. Nor is the fact is is a recurrence. Very big difference to someone with stage IV & no mets. Or just bone mets. One of the articles you linked said 20% at five years.
That is unfair to discount the "next week". While the chances are slim, she could get an infection due to chemo that could be her demise. AS medical professionals, we never want to take away someone’s hope because someone will always do better than predicted, but the odds are not favorable. Hopefully, she will be one of those gals & will outlive the scoundrel she married. :)
Here’s a kicker for the discussion why she didn’t leave him. Maybe she is hiding something from her past. Two can play the game. Just messing with you…. :)
Lym BO, true the links aren’t very specific. I wanted to post them because what they do show is that none of the stats published in the last few years are reliable. Why? Because so many new treatment modalities have just come into play and those patients taking the newer drugs have yet to die and be counted in the mortality stats.
Look at Randy Pausch - pancreatic cancer, one of the most fearsome types of cancer, and yet he lived for 22 months beyond his diagnosis. It’s been said that his timing was only slightly off; had he been diagnosed just a few months later than he was, he would have likely benefitted from proton beam treatment. In any case, his survival was largely due to taking cutting edge drugs.
With the advent of so many new drugs passing clinical trials with a good measure of success, not to mention the abiity to link the patient up to data showing which drug regimen will have the greatest chance of success, I believe there’s a lot of reason for optimism. I am sure Edwards has access to the best drugs and will probably far outlive expectations.
The odds of Edwards getting an infection that would spiral her to death inside a week are statistically low. However, given the recent swine flu outbreak, it’s entirely possible that it could have been her demise. But I’ll stick with my belief that she’ll be around for some time.
While I can’t sing her praises, I do hope she lives to see that scoundrel husband squirm into oblivion. Now that would be divine justice.
Now what could she be hiding, I wonder? Her own dalliance, perhaps? Hmmmmmm…….life can be full of surprises.
Perceive Elizabeth Edwards as a paragon of strength? Not me, not for a minute. It’s very sad that she lost a child and it’s sad that she has recurring cancer. But many women have had worse life experiences and have managed to prevail and overcome. Edwards would be better off considering that had it not been for the death of her son she probably would not have gone to the trouble of having two kids at ages 48 and 50. The recurring cancer? She’s got a treatable form of cancer and should be thankful for that much.
As far as the philandering husband, what she decides is up to her. But if her decision is made on the basis of what is best for his political career [which is defunct] as opposed to what is best for the family as a whole, then shame on her. Making deals with the devil are NEVER a good idea.
I agree whole-heartedly with Dianne Lopp who knows, as I do, that emotional wounds caused by a father who chose to “opt out” are life-long. Elizabeth Edwards should know that this business of playing ostritch is stupid and self-defeating and doing irreparable harm to Hunter’s child.
While I cannot condone an extra-marital affair, I will applaud everything that Hunter does to protect her daughter.
Terry D: "Terminal cancer" as used in the medical community generally refers to any cancer than cannot be cured. It is also used at times for those cases where treatment is available but not efficient, thereby resulting in eventual death prognosis. As I understand it, Edwards’ treatment has been efficacious. The stats for her type of cancer show that it’s not at all unlikely, as long as treatment works, for her to live an other decade. In short, "terminal cancer" means that as long as the treatment regimen works that more than likely an individual will sustain life indefinitely. It’s a confusing term, I think.
She’s an ostritch because she is in denial, which is a self-defeating defense mechanism. It doesn’t mean she’s stupid. You may think this is self-preservation, but in the end it is not.
No one’s arguing that it’s her decision to make or not.
I don’t know much about paternity tests, but I would imagine that all Hunter has to do is to have the child’s saliva tested and file the results with her attorney. Then she could let it sit there for all eternity or perhaps get a court order for John to submit a sample for matching. [Is that how it works? I don’t know.]
In any case, I thought I read that Hunter originally didn’t want the test done some time ago. Or maybe that was a stipulation in a contract for child support. In any case, regardless of how it comes out, I think the child is entitled to know who her father is.
A few random thoughts about the above:
1) I know of many women who were in this position, divorced their husband and regretted it for years. It is an individual decision, everyone has different needs.
2) Experiences with prostitutes is a totally different thing from having a long term affair with someone. The former is strictly a physical thing and has nothing to do with emotions, the latter involves emotional involvement and therefore is far more hurtful to the marital relationship.
3)I have read in many periodicals (not the supermarket ones) that John Edwards is paying a very substantial monthly sum to his former lover and her child. He certainly can afford it without it affecting his family.
4)Half of the children in our country are being raised by one parent many with the other "parent" having nothing to do with them. I pretty much raised my 3 sons alone (including one who wasn’t even mine) and they turned out to be highly successful adults with good careers and excellent parenting skill.
5)To me one of the worst things about this whole Edwards’ situation is having Elizabeth writing a book about it and going on every tv show that would have her. That is almost as bad as what he did! I much more admire the demeanor of Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Spitzer who carried themselves with dignity.