Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 05/07/2009 11:00 pm

Is Elizabeth Edwards making a mistake by staying with husband John? Where do you stand on post-affair reconciliation?

Candice Bergen, Liz Smith and Joan Ganz Cooney share their thoughts. Would you stand by your man? Join the conversation …
© Getty Images
Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 05/07/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: Elizabeth Edwards 'Made Her Own Big Ethical Mistake'

Who knows if Elizabeth Edwards made a mistake sticking with that bum? That’s entirely up to her.

Where she made her own big ethical mistake is to allow him to go on running for the presidency after he’d revealed his "affair" to her. She was enabling him to prevail while lying, cheating and being a potential scandal for American voters who believed in him. And her current book is a disgrace. I feel sorry for her heartbreak and her illness, but not to the extent that (1) she enabled him to go on being a public fraud in trying for the highest office in the land, and (2) she blames the "other woman" for enticing him into the affair as if he had no willpower and no responsibility for his own actions. 

Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 05/07/2009 11:00 pm

Joan Ganz Cooney Understands Some of Elizabeth Edwards's Decisions

I don’t know if Elizabeth Edwards is making a mistake staying with her husband because it’s impossible to know how much pain she is in after learning of the affair. She is seriously ill and has two young children so it is understandable that she might be reluctant to ask him to move out. However, I think she is making a mistake writing a book about the affair and publicizing it. She must really hate him to decide to be so publicly punitive. And it’s got to be an embarrassment to their children, particularly their grown daughter. I would have preferred that they work their marriage problems out in private.
Candice Bergen

Candice Bergen | 05/08/2009 7:00 am

Candice Bergen on Edwards Affair

I have to say I agree with Joan on Elizabeth Edwards. The woman has terminal cancer for Christ’s sake and three kids and has been married to someone she describes as a good man for many years. The sleaze in this is, of course, John, but Rielle Hunter — who came up with that ridiculous name herself by the bye; her name used to be something entirely other and she gives women a black eye. We all know the type, they make your hair go all weird and your teeth chatter. They are utterly amoral, without a shred of conscience and tough as tacks. But I seem to have veered off message here. I also, like Joan, question her writing a book but till I read some of it, I’ll hold off on blathering on about it. She is a remarkable woman and I am very sorry she has had so much to endure. Including a husband who is dumb enough to be sucked in by an ambitious cooze. 

124 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

starry Nite

Who are we to judge what is or is not the best course of action for Elizabeth and John.

I don’t really know Elizabeth or John personally.  Both have done good deeds.  She might be shrew and he a Don Juan.  I have compassion for both of them.

My wish is that they find their way on whatever path they take and that their children are not harmed.

By starry Nite on 05/09/2009 9:59 pm
Catherine Gallagher

What a woman decides in her relationship is her business; what’s right for you, may not be right for Elizabeth Edwards.   People should stop calling Elizabeth, John, and Rielle names—it’s childish and ridiculous.  The pain this couple is struggling to overcome is monumental; what purpose is served by calling them names and tearing them down as they try to rebuild their lives and family?  Why must we engage in cruel name calling and harsh judgment of this couple for choosing to remain a family?

As women, rather than judge Elizabeth Edwards what we should be moved to anger and judgment on is the years it took the Illinois medical examiner to figure out that Kathleen Savio was murdered by her husband Drew Peterson; that her dead body in a dry bathtub was not an accidental drowning.  

As women we should be moved to anger and judgment that Stephen Morgan harassed, stalked, and murdered the beautiful Johanna Justin-Jinich.  As women we should be moved to anger and judgment that Connie Culp endured an 80% face transplant because her husband shot her in the face.  Women should not sit in judgment of those who choose to rebuild their families.  Rather, women need to be concerned with a more fundamental issue: a woman’s right to live on earth—a woman’s right to live free of violence, harassment, disfigurement, stalking, and threat of death.  

At this very moment a man is beating a woman to death…judge that and not Elizabeth Edwards.

By Catherine Gallagher on 05/09/2009 11:35 pm
judy smith
Here, here Catherine. Enough of other women judging her or anyone else’s decisions in a marriage. So much else is going on against women all over the world and right next door. 
By judy smith on 05/10/2009 6:59 pm
RoseMerry Hoffman
This is a very personal question and I am sadden to see someone that I admire as much as Candice Bergen participating in this dreck. Have not the Edwards suffered enough? Okay, maybe John has not but Ms. Edwards has. Leave them alone and talk about some real issues.
By RoseMerry Hoffman on 05/10/2009 12:03 pm
Andrea Brandon

I’ve always wondered if behind the scenes Elizabeth controlled more of John’s career than he himself did. Was the affair more about her loss of control over him  than the indignity of the affair itself.

By Andrea Brandon on 05/10/2009 12:29 pm
Ruth  Jernick
With the publication of this book, Elizabeth Edwards is no longer the victim. Maybe we were all as wrong about her as we were about her husband. I find it unutterably sad that Elizabeth Edwards not only blames the other woman, but has swallowed hook, line and sinker John’s account of how the other woman seduced him. Elizabeth told Oprah about it last week, as if she were there for the sedution scene, and condemned Riell Hunter’s "pursuit" of John. Oprah’s show was excruciatingly painful to watch when she started talking to John, who is such an incredible weasel. I am heartbroken that Elizabeth is terminally ill and has two young children, but I think she deserves better than to spend the remainder of her life with a creep for a husband. It’s wonderful that she is trying to surround her kids with love for as long as possible, but what about "the other woman’s" daughter? Do she and John not care about that child? It makes Elizabeth as bad as John to publically attack Hunter as a sexual predator/snake poor John could not resist, repeatedly, and then to disregard her child’s feelings. I understand that Hunter now is seeking a paternity test. It’s about time. The villain here is John Edwards. It is not Riell Hunter, and it is not her daughter. 
By Ruth Jernick on 05/10/2009 12:43 pm
Jamie Nelson

Amen, amen Ruth!  I’m amazed that everyone focuses on Elizabeth Edwards’ pain, but not the pain of an innocent child that is being made to grow up without a father.  It’s morally repugnant that Elizabeth and John are ignoring this baby, which looks exactly like John.  If she were not his child they could have easily cleared that up in the interview; the fact that they won’t indicates to me that they’re sure she is but they just don’t care to deal with it.  How is that okay?

 I don’t give a hoot whether the Edwards stay together but they must do the right thing by this innocent baby.  I cannot feel sympathy for Elizabeth Edwards until she loses her dismissive attitude toward this child, who is almost certainly the half-sister of her own children. 

 Why is no one in the media bringing this up?  It is a moral outrage that this child is uncared for by her father, and Elizabeth is basically approving his abandonment, which I find appalling.  I can’t have sympathy for Elizabeth until she has sympathy for little Frances Hunter, the innocent victim in all of this. 

By Jamie Nelson on 05/10/2009 4:51 pm
lede39 57
All of the postings have valid points.  My belief is that Elizabeth Edwards has chosen to remain with John in an attempt to stabilize the lives of the children knowing she is dying.  I was a little amazed that she minimized John Edward’s role in the affair.  Yes, women have to respect each other and themselves, but men have an obligation to respect their wives and children. He behaved as a weasel. She may have also written the book to leave a legacy both financially and written to her children.  We never know a person’s finances. I wish them well.
By lede39 57 on 05/10/2009 4:06 pm
Chrome Toe

I’ve been going through and reading various threads. I totally don’t get why people post on threads in regards to subjects they PROFESS not to care about. One woman has posted on virtually every celebrity thread that it’s all drivel. so what are you doing posting on it. and if you think other things like face transplant patient is more important… go post on THAT thread. Just cracks me up people. if you don’t like it… don’t read it.. don’t post on it…If you think the Edwards business is their business then please spare us the four paragraphs under the Edwards thread as to why it’s thier private business and no one elses. Apparently it’s enough of your business to read the post and post on it. Just hilariously ironic.

By Chrome Toe on 05/10/2009 5:15 pm
Amy Kadori
This is no ones business other than the people involved. Moralizing is boring and inappropriate. Leave them alone. It is just sex. why should you care? Why DO you care? 
By Amy Kadori on 05/10/2009 6:33 pm
Marilyn Wilson
i get what she is say….one moment does not define our marriage.  plus, she is not well and he should take care of her like she is a queen.  probably too late for her to kick his butt!  he will suffer alone.
By Marilyn Wilson on 05/10/2009 6:54 pm
Belinda Joy

For me, I stress, my personal opinion…

Once a man has betrayed my trust by way of cheating, I could never trust him again. When I heard Elizabeth say that the one thing she asked of John when they got married was that he remain faithful, it brought back memories. I too have asked this of men I was in committed relationships with. Why? Of all the things I could ask for why this? Clearly on a deep level like Elizabeth, we had a sixth sense of what was to come. Thinking if we could just get verbal confirmation from our guys it would ease our minds.

I think it takes a special kind of person to cheat. I know I could never cheat on someone I loved. Under no circumstances. Unlike other women on this site who constantly speak of "you never know?" as I always say there are some concrete truths I know about myself. I have never stayed nor would I with a man who hit me, cheated on me or chose to lie to me repeatedly.

But in the case of Elizabeth, only she knows why she is choosing to stay with John. He must be giving her something on some level I just don’t see. And the fact that he had unprotected sex with Rielle…..it just grosses me out.

By Belinda Joy on 05/10/2009 7:35 pm
Pamela Kizziar

In normal circumstances I would not stay with a cheater, however if I knew I was dying I probably would make the same decision Elizabeth has.  Her passing away and leaving her children will be stressful enough for her children.  I’m sure at this point she wants their lives to be as "normal" as possible.  Getting a divorce and going through ALL THAT would disrupt the little time she has left with her children.  When she said she was not going to let the other woman effect her, I am sure she meant she was not going to give her a thought because the most important things in her life now is being with her children and living as "normal" a life as possible.

By Pamela Kizziar on 05/10/2009 11:34 pm
Michelle Woolf
I think both of the Edwards are slick, repulsive phonies of the highest order. Living in their huge mansion while talking of the "Two Americas" making a killing off the procceds from outrageous ambulance chasing lawsuits and taking money from hedge funds while so called championing the poor. Her attitude during the primaries when she KNEW he was a cheat and that it was only a matter of time before the news came out seems to be pathological. I agree that Rielle Hunter is also disgusting. John Edwards is so NOT hot and it serves all THREE of them right to get ridiculed. However she was just following the Edwards lead. Cheat and take as much from the suckers as you can until you get caught. Then go on Oprah, tell the whole odious story in a book and hope you can scam a whole lot more money from gullible chumps, like the ones who actually donated time and money to these grifters.
By Michelle Woolf on 05/16/2009 6:54 pm
KatyDid Wells

Who’s to say which emotion will grab you the hardest when push comes to shove and decisions must be made?  Fear, anger, shame and embarrassment… All of this and more come into play when adultery is exposed. 

Elizabeth Edwards made her decision and who are we to judge?  All I know is my opinion, based on my own personal experience.  Leopards truly do not change their spots.  This isn’t a guarantee that he’ll do it again, but if the mindset that goes along with love and fidelity was not present before, it certainly won’t be present after the man is forgiven and given another chance. 

I agree with Joan, releasing this book is just sad and it’s obvious that she is beyond angry.  I don’t have any desire to commiserate with Elizabeth Edwards and give an ear to their private woes - this book just extends her bitterness - I won’t be rushing out to read it. 

As I said before, I can only talk from experience and what I discovered is that life is too short to be so bitter and unhappy. Too many couples stay together because they believe in the love they once had, but if true love still existed in this marriage they wouldn’t treat each other so despicably.  There is so much unnecessary sadness in marriages today - if you are that angry and unhappy in your marriage, it’s time to step away and move on.  It takes courage - it’s not easy and it’s not the end of the world, but it is a chance to start fresh and be happier in the long-run!

By KatyDid Wells on 05/27/2009 1:21 pm