Greta Van Susteren, Sally Quinn, Sarah Palin | 07/10/2009 11:45 am
Greta Van Susteren Takes on Letterman, Sally Quinn for Palin-Bashing (Video)

Greta Van Susteren is mad as hell and she’s not gonna take it anymore.
On her FOX News Channel show, "On the Record," last night, Van Susteren took The Washington Post’s "Sally Quinn" and others to task for shamelessly bashing not only Sarah Palin, but Palin’s children, as well. Meanwhile, Bristol Palin’s baby’s daddy, Levi Johnston, has his own theory about why Sarah Palin announced her resignation from the Alaska governorship: money. More on that later.
Van Susteren said last night:
"Why is Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn gratuitously trashing Gov. Palin? Quinn even accuses Palin of exploiting her children, specifically Bristol and little Trig, little Trig, who has Down’s syndrome. And David Letterman — he also can’t stay away from the governor, either."
Letterman made another sexually tainted joke about Palin this week, saying: "Is it just me or is anyone having naughty thoughts about Sarah Palin and those waders," referring to the fishing outfit she wore when talking to reporters this week while defending her resignation.
In an interview on MSNBC Thursday, Quinn, founder of the Post’s "On Faith" blog, said:
Well, clearly, she has not put her family first … And these children have, it seems publicly, to have been exploited by her in a, I think, really unfortunate way … She brings them all to the convention, including Trig, the baby. She brings the pregnant daughter with the boyfriend who clearly didn’t want to be there. She then travels around with the children, using them as sort of photo ops … she brings the children up when she needs them to shore up her own image.
Think what you want about the Alaska governor, but it’s likely many women think these kinds of slams are just inappropriate.
"This is wrong because, first of all, they are attacking her parenting skills. And why we are debating whether or not she should have had her kids up as late as she did on the night of the nominating convention is just borderline bizarre, particularly because we don’t ask that question of any of the guys who bring their children to big political events," former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a Republican who also had young children in office, said on "On the Record." "But even importantly, don’t we have more important things to be discussing in this country? And activities, we could move on to things that actually impact the millions of families who don’t have a job or don’t have paid maternity leave, things that are legitimate public policy issues."
Meanwhile, Levi Johnston, Bristol’s former fiancée, told reporters Thursday that he once heard Palin talking about how she could have a better life in which she could spend more time at home with less stress, and could accept high-paying offers coming her way. After all — she is the Republican everybody’s talking about at the moment. Johnston said that in December Palin "had talked about how nice it would be to take some of this money people have been offering us and just run with it, and saying forget everything else." Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton had a quick comeback for that, saying: "It is interesting to learn Levi is working on a piece of fiction while honing his acting skills."
It’s no secret the Palins and Johnston have become, well, more distant in recent months as Johnston has taken to the press to criticize Alaska’s first family, and to talk about how much visitation his family should have with his son, born to Bristol, December 28.
Watch Van Susteren and Swift below:























378 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
And I believe that Levi is a young man who should not have unkind things said about him simply because he had the misfortune to become involved with the Palins.
One more thing, he did not choose his mother.
"And I believe that Levi is a young man who should not have unkind things said about him simply because he had the misfortune to become involved with the Palins. "
You’re absolutely right, Maggie…too bad the left didn’t figure that one out while he was still on good terms with the Palins, though.
deber B, the Republicans are the ones who cleaned up Levi and paraded him around. I believed them, thought two nice kids were going to make the best of a ‘poor-timing’ situation. Had I not seen Levi on display at the convention, I’d have no opinion of him. Seems like Reps make and break their own.
Peace and grace
Beth, peace and grace to you.
Forgive me, but I see no point in engaging in tabloid mentality over a young couple that engaged in unprotected sex and had a beautiful baby. It has been going on since the beginning of time. It can serve no meaningful purpose. I am quite amazed that democrats would rather talk about Levi and Bristol than the disaster that is occurring in our White House and across our country.
Again, may I extend peace and grace.
With sincere respect to you, deber B, you introduced the explanation of eligibility for the presidency, but you did not respond to my facts, which were not tabloid fodder. Personally, my thinking is that this thread concerned ‘Palin Bashing’. All democrats do not engage in conversation about the Palins at all, but, when asked, will present a view, not a monolithic response based on party affiliation, but a view. We are not all meeting in smoke-filled rooms plotting the devastation of the country or the two party system. Perhaps we should accept that the internet is probably both productive and destructive. I have to believe that much of the rancor and divisiveness among groups today is due to the speed and not the accuracy with which this medium operates. Like it or not, it’s what democracy is all about. Pardon if this offends, but it does illustrate: Democracy is like sex. When it’s good, it’s really good, and when it’s bad, it’s still pretty good.
Have a good Sunday, deber B
Peace and grace
When are people ever going to get that "talking about safe sex" does not impact teenagers? Nope..just like "talking about drinking" "talking about ____"
Teenagers will continue to push the odds until their frontal lobes are developed…unless they experince the consequences of parenthood, first hand.
Abortion serves to hide the consequence…not stop the process of conception. Teens should have to go through intense interaction with other teens that have become parents. From one on one contact with the child care, to numerous meetings where the pitfalls of young parents are shared. Unfortunately, teens must live it, before many learn it…
Bristol took responsibility…she did not choose to cover it up and abort.
86% of Americans support significant restrictions for abortions.
Nearly every demographic sub group has moved towards pro-life with the exception of non-Catholics and men under the age of 45. The greates shift has been with Liberals and Independents…Dems..slightly less.
53% believe that abortion does more harm than good to the woman over the long term
79% believe in conscience exemption for health care workers.
*chuckle* like mother, like daughter!