Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Greta Van Susteren, Sally Quinn, Sarah Palin | 07/10/2009 11:45 am

Greta Van Susteren Takes on Letterman, Sally Quinn for Palin-Bashing (Video)

It’s one thing to bash the woman, but quite another to bash her children, Van Susteren says; Levi Johnston pipes up about Palin’s resignation.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Fox

Greta Van Susteren is mad as hell and she’s not gonna take it anymore.

On her FOX News Channel show, "On the Record," last night, Van Susteren took The Washington Post’s "Sally Quinn" and others to task for shamelessly bashing not only Sarah Palin, but Palin’s children, as well. Meanwhile, Bristol Palin’s baby’s daddy, Levi Johnston, has his own theory about why Sarah Palin announced her resignation from the Alaska governorship: money. More on that later.

Van Susteren said last night:

"Why is Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn gratuitously trashing Gov. Palin? Quinn even accuses Palin of exploiting her children, specifically Bristol and little Trig, little Trig, who has Down’s syndrome. And David Letterman — he also can’t stay away from the governor, either."

Letterman made another sexually tainted joke about Palin this week, saying: "Is it just me or is anyone having naughty thoughts about Sarah Palin and those waders," referring to the fishing outfit she wore when talking to reporters this week while defending her resignation.

In an interview on MSNBC Thursday, Quinn, founder of the Post’s "On Faith" blog, said:

Well, clearly, she has not put her family first … And these children have, it seems publicly, to have been exploited by her in a, I think, really unfortunate way … She brings them all to the convention, including Trig, the baby. She brings the pregnant daughter with the boyfriend who clearly didn’t want to be there. She then travels around with the children, using them as sort of photo ops … she brings the children up when she needs them to shore up her own image.

Think what you want about the Alaska governor, but it’s likely many women think these kinds of slams are just inappropriate.

"This is wrong because, first of all, they are attacking her parenting skills. And why we are debating whether or not she should have had her kids up as late as she did on the night of the nominating convention is just borderline bizarre, particularly because we don’t ask that question of any of the guys who bring their children to big political events," former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a Republican who also had young children in office, said on "On the Record." "But even importantly, don’t we have more important things to be discussing in this country? And activities, we could move on to things that actually impact the millions of families who don’t have a job or don’t have paid maternity leave, things that are legitimate public policy issues."

Meanwhile, Levi Johnston, Bristol’s former fiancée, told reporters Thursday that he once heard Palin talking about how she could have a better life in which she could spend more time at home with less stress, and could accept high-paying offers coming her way. After all — she is the Republican everybody’s talking about at the moment. Johnston said that in December Palin "had talked about how nice it would be to take some of this money people have been offering us and just run with it, and saying forget everything else." Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton had a quick comeback for that, saying: "It is interesting to learn Levi is working on a piece of fiction while honing his acting skills."

It’s no secret the Palins and Johnston have become, well, more distant in recent months as Johnston has taken to the press to criticize Alaska’s first family, and to talk about how much visitation his family should have with his son, born to Bristol, December 28.

Watch Van Susteren and Swift below:

378 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maggie W
Well now, Rachel, there is some truth to that.  If you look at when Todd and Sarah got married and when Track was born… uh, well, there’s something a bit odd.   Now there is nothing wrong with that… except Sarah’s story.  According to her, they eloped because she knew her parents couldn’t afford a lavish wedding.  One more time, no one would have thought a thing if she would have just kept her mouth shut.
By Maggie W on 07/10/2009 4:59 pm
Rachel F
How are those two things mutually exclusive?! How is it a lie to say that they eloped because her family couldn’t afford a big wedding just because she was pregnant at the time? Unless you’re assuming that pregnant people don’t/can’t have large weddings (which isn’t true), there’s no reason that being pregnant and eloping because you can’t afford a large wedding are mutually exclusive — at all!
By Rachel F on 07/10/2009 5:09 pm
Maggie W
Well, according to your logic, why elope?  Why not just have a small family wedding in the parents’ living room?  Many people have.  My cousin got married in a small park in a foreign city with a few homeless people cheering them on.  She was four months pregnant.  Why spin some story about family finances as the barrier to a wedding?    Typical Sarah looking for verification and admiration.  Way too much information that wasn’t necessary. 
By Maggie W on 07/10/2009 5:35 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary
Wow. Isn’t it kinda creepy researching wedding dates, in relation to childrens’ birthdays? Haven’t we moved beyond “outings” like that?
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 07/10/2009 5:15 pm
Maggie W
Mary, I read that when media descended upon Wasilla,  all sorts of things came out of the woodwork. That is true when an unknown person arrives on the national stage.  Todd and Sarah have carved out a life for themselves and are still standing.  Enough said.
By Maggie W on 07/10/2009 5:30 pm
Lady Gator

Maggie — I enjoy "debating" with you — however, the "count the months since they were married (gosh she was pregnant when they married) days are long gone.  I think they went out in the late 50’s or early 60’s.  I was raised in a small town.  Every time someone got married the local gossips would put an x on the calendar.  God help if the baby was a day early!  I thought we had gotten past that old sterotype stuff.

Today, who really cares if someone is PG when they get married.  I really respect your posts - but, please give this idea a break. 

Peace and "let’s all just try to get along".

By Lady Gator on 07/10/2009 8:35 pm
Maggie W
Point well taken, Gator.  You are correct.  I stand back.  The Palins have been married for several years. What brought them to that marriage can only be considered a blessing. 
By Maggie W on 07/10/2009 9:05 pm
Amanda C

hey, i’m not the one who got knocked up as an unwed teenager without a highschool diploma. if that isn’t class…

By Amanda C on 07/10/2009 5:17 pm
Rachel F
I thought it was only religious fanatics that were so judgemental of unwed teen mothers?
By Rachel F on 07/10/2009 5:53 pm
Amanda C

hey, my mom was a teen in highschool when she got knocked up with me. unfortunately, she got married to my father and was divorced just a year later… i don’t claim that my mother had any class when she got herself knocked up without having any way to take care of me or my brothers that would come along afterwards.

i forgot… only conservative unwed teen mothers deserve respect and assistance.

By Amanda C on 07/13/2009 5:32 pm
deber B
LOL!
By deber B on 07/10/2009 4:03 pm
Rachel F

Wow, that’s a real gem of a statement, Maggie. Governor Palin has had to spend $500,000 because a handful of deranged liberals have filed bogus ethics claims against her…nice to see that you’re gloating about an American citizen, and a mother of five, being harassed with bogus claims, so much so that she — and her family — are $500,000 in debt. That’s a very sweet attitude.

Some one tell me again that liberals are the compassionate ones, please! I need a good laugh!

By Rachel F on 07/10/2009 1:57 pm
Maggie W
Sure, Rachel.  I’ll be happy to tell you.  Liberals are compassionate.  There you go!
By Maggie W on 07/10/2009 2:41 pm
Rachel F
Thanks, a little bit of humor is good for everyone! :)
By Rachel F on 07/10/2009 2:47 pm
Lotus Kann
She’s not in debt for legal fees, her PAC already had a Sarah Palin Legal Defense Fund. Its not coming out of her pockets.  She lied to you on that one.
By Lotus Kann on 07/10/2009 3:07 pm