Greta Van Susteren, Sally Quinn, Sarah Palin | 07/10/2009 11:45 am
Greta Van Susteren Takes on Letterman, Sally Quinn for Palin-Bashing (Video)

Greta Van Susteren is mad as hell and she’s not gonna take it anymore.
On her FOX News Channel show, "On the Record," last night, Van Susteren took The Washington Post’s "Sally Quinn" and others to task for shamelessly bashing not only Sarah Palin, but Palin’s children, as well. Meanwhile, Bristol Palin’s baby’s daddy, Levi Johnston, has his own theory about why Sarah Palin announced her resignation from the Alaska governorship: money. More on that later.
Van Susteren said last night:
"Why is Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn gratuitously trashing Gov. Palin? Quinn even accuses Palin of exploiting her children, specifically Bristol and little Trig, little Trig, who has Down’s syndrome. And David Letterman — he also can’t stay away from the governor, either."
Letterman made another sexually tainted joke about Palin this week, saying: "Is it just me or is anyone having naughty thoughts about Sarah Palin and those waders," referring to the fishing outfit she wore when talking to reporters this week while defending her resignation.
In an interview on MSNBC Thursday, Quinn, founder of the Post’s "On Faith" blog, said:
Well, clearly, she has not put her family first … And these children have, it seems publicly, to have been exploited by her in a, I think, really unfortunate way … She brings them all to the convention, including Trig, the baby. She brings the pregnant daughter with the boyfriend who clearly didn’t want to be there. She then travels around with the children, using them as sort of photo ops … she brings the children up when she needs them to shore up her own image.
Think what you want about the Alaska governor, but it’s likely many women think these kinds of slams are just inappropriate.
"This is wrong because, first of all, they are attacking her parenting skills. And why we are debating whether or not she should have had her kids up as late as she did on the night of the nominating convention is just borderline bizarre, particularly because we don’t ask that question of any of the guys who bring their children to big political events," former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a Republican who also had young children in office, said on "On the Record." "But even importantly, don’t we have more important things to be discussing in this country? And activities, we could move on to things that actually impact the millions of families who don’t have a job or don’t have paid maternity leave, things that are legitimate public policy issues."
Meanwhile, Levi Johnston, Bristol’s former fiancée, told reporters Thursday that he once heard Palin talking about how she could have a better life in which she could spend more time at home with less stress, and could accept high-paying offers coming her way. After all — she is the Republican everybody’s talking about at the moment. Johnston said that in December Palin "had talked about how nice it would be to take some of this money people have been offering us and just run with it, and saying forget everything else." Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton had a quick comeback for that, saying: "It is interesting to learn Levi is working on a piece of fiction while honing his acting skills."
It’s no secret the Palins and Johnston have become, well, more distant in recent months as Johnston has taken to the press to criticize Alaska’s first family, and to talk about how much visitation his family should have with his son, born to Bristol, December 28.
Watch Van Susteren and Swift below:























378 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
No, Lotus, she didn’t. It’s her responsibility to pay that money; there are independent groups and individuals raising money to assist her, but that is simply the generosity of people who believe in Palin, or even just realize that she was treated abominably because of her opinions. But the Palins are ultimately responsible for those costs, whether people donate a cent or not to them to assist; it’s no more "lying" to say that than it is for someone whose coworkers raised some money to pay for a surgery to talk about how much that surgery is costing.
Yes it is. Those ethical charges are ways that citizens can hold their elected officials accountable. Mrs. Palin is no different in that than any other elected officials. And as such she has a PAC that takes in contributions and dispurses the fund to various expenses, funding a legal team is one of those expenses. The money’s not coming out of her own pocket, don’t believe that one.
Now Senator John Ensign,has taken this a step further and he chooses to also pay for his mistress and her entire family including her 19 year old son, from the campaign fund.
deber B…how is he not credible? Who introduced him to us? Oops his sorta kinda mother in law. She brought him on stage and said such wonderful things about him…How long had he been dating her daughter before the pregnancy? But now he’s not credible…Reminds me when in 2000 wrote a glowing letter of recommendatiion for her then brother in law to the Alaska State Police on Wasilla Mayoral letterhead. Guess she didn’t realize its not kosher to write a letter of recommendation for a relative on official mayoral letterhead. You think…But like Levi, her brother in law became instantly "not credible" when he dumped Sarah Palin’s sister for another woman. Governor Palin went on an all out effort to get the once wonderful guy fired. She wanted his employee file and when the head of the Alaska State Police refused stating it was against the state’s employee privacy laws…she fired him. No matter that she had begged him to come out of retirement to take the job as head of the State Police…ah Sarah Sarah…This became the ethical quaqmire called TROOPERGATE. Here is her original glowing letter for her brother in law, who soon became not credible according to Governor Palin…
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site163/2008/0721/20080721_111415_PalinLetterofRecomend.pdf
Hi, Suzanne, how are you doing?
She has resigned. You will have to find a new dead horse to beat. I’m sorry to have to inform you that Sarah Palin is no longer Governor. So, whose next on your list of Vice President contenders who didn’t win?
Deborah, if I was running for office, I would have my children at specific events. I wouldn’t continually be parading them in front of the camera and dragging them in tow through all of those campaign stops.
I am not the one who should be ashamed. You may choose to reserve your holy and righteous thoughts for the governor who exploited her children at every opportunity and is now throwing herself a great pity party. That is indeed irresponsible behavior and where the shame lies.
Keep talking, Levi!
Of course—it’s just the sleaziness of her way of quitting that bothers many esp. in AK. She left her citizens in the lurch. That’s really a stupid political move. Already certain Republican congressmen—Rep. Terry Lee, R. Nebraska, Rep. Frank Wolfe, R. Northern Virginia, Rep. Pete Hoestra, R. Michigan to name a few— who barely squeaked by in the last election have publicly stated they don’t want any help from her. They see her as a detriment. Here’s a site with info:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vulnerable-republicans-want-palin-to…
To be fair there are a few who would welcome her—they’re mentioned in the article.
How in the lurch?! She left a capable, credible lieutenant governor to take her place — and he’s got much more of a shot at getting the legislator to cooperate, as the Alaskan dems turned their back on all previous bi-partisan agreement and sought to crucify her after her VP run. Plus she’s leaving with the treasury full, so the next guy has a good starting point.
With all the absurd ethics cases brought against her (and dismissed, each time…), the refusal of Alaskan dems to work with her anymore, etc., etc., she really didn’t have a chance at helping her state during the remainder of her term. So she stepped aside for someone who would. Good for her, and good for Alaska.
The Dems in the legislature were not working with her, they were working against her, with no thought to the welfare of the state. It’s not like there will be no governor; there will be — but not one that the dems in the legislature have made a priority to crucify; in other words, they might actually get something done to benefit the state, rather than pursuing their own private vendetta.
And, even if "a couple" of the ethics charges had "merit" (I disagree, but, for argument’s sake…), what about all the rest? It’s a waste of state resources, and Palin knows that.