Sean Hannity, Waterboarding | 04/23/2009 9:30 am
FOX News's Sean Hannity Agrees to Be Waterboarded for Charity (Video)

FOX News’s Sean Hannity said he’d be up for being waterboarded — so long as he could do it for charity.
Some in the media, including Vanity Fair’s Christopher Hitchens and FOX News’ Oliver North, have been waterboarded. On his show last night, Hannity talked to actor Charles Grodin, who sparred with the host a bit over torture, among other things.
Grodin wondered how much mascara Hannity had on, while Hannity asked Grodin if he’d ever accept a book from Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez or listen to a speech by a "brutal thug murdering dictator like [Nicaraguan President] Daniel Ortega," as President Obama recently did. Grodin then asked if Hannity supported torture, to which the commentator replied, "I’m for enhanced interrogation techniques."
"They already chopped off Daniel Pearl’s head, they already drove planes into a building and the Pentagon," Hannity said. "Is it really so bad to dunk a terrorist’s head in water to make him talk?!"
"I’m not against anything as long as we know who we’re doing it to," Grodin said, as opposed to a simple suspect.
Asked whether he would consent to being waterboarded, Hannity said: "Sure … I’ll do it for charity … I’ll do it for the troops’ families."
Watch Part 1 of the video below:
Watch Part 2 of the video below:























187 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
you aren’t kidding.
i wonder what our parents, grandparents and ancestors would say if they saw this kind of garbage being carried out under the banner of america.
Lila
My Army son has also told me exactly what you have said about the treatment of prisoners. When the truth about Abu Ghraib was released and I could talk to him and ask him what he thought he said, (paraphrasing) "We know we are never to mistreat prisoners, not even if we are ordered to do so. You refuse the order. You just don’t do it." He said the interpreters were the ones that would tell you to do stuff to the prisoners, and what to do, but he wouldn’t do it. He couldn’t stomach it, but also knew that it was wrong, and he could be prosecuted for it. He said that everyone knew that the unit that was in charge of Abu Ghraib were pretty tough "rednecks" (his words - no offense to any rednecks). They didn’t need much prompting to do what they did. They didn’t care. Your average soldier know the rules and works by them.
Re: people picked up in war zones. In 2003 Eric was in Afghanistan and they captured many foreign fighters that were there to kill Americans. They turned them over to the Afghani authorities. These were some pretty bad guys that the villagers had complained about. Turn around and the following year Eric is in Iraq and they pick up a band of guys and they realize it is most of the same group they had captured in Afghanistan. They were Syrian and another group was from Iran. They are distinguished by the tatoos on their arms and necks. My son’s company had learned that that was they way to know them. These fighters had killed many soldiers and civilians - knew that the local authorities eventually would send them to the border and let them loose. There were thousands of those types of fighters there and they moved from country to country for the opportunity to kill an American or anyone who aided Americans. They were ruthless and very capable. Could teach masters courses in laying IED’s.
Frannie, MANY THANKS to your son for upholding the true American way even in the face of such dangers. His unit did exactly the right thing in turning over the foreign fighters to the Afghan authorities - that’s according to the Geneva Conventions. It is very frustrating when you just see the same fighters again somewhere else, but we are supposed to choose the difficult right over the easy wrong; that’s integrity. The fighters who get away to fight some more can never damage America as much as we can damage ourselves by stooping to tactics worthy of a tin-pot dictatorship.
May your son stay safe!
Lila,
As former military I know you know that half the bullshit that is being said about our troops is, just that - bullshit. There are always bad actors and it is a terrible and sad situation because of war. There will always be those that step outside of what is right. Because we are in war and there is no draft, today our soldiers have 4 and 5 deployments under their belt before they are 24 years old. They see their buddies blown up, their heads blown off, or find them in a ditch decapitated and it sits hard with them, but ratio wise considering the number of engagements, almost 10 times out of 10 they do what they are trained to do. Last year when Eric was in northern Iraq with a Stryker Unit he said the locals were turning AQI in left and right. All the army did was turn them over to the authorities, or the Iraqi Army. If the local civilians got a hold of AQI, they wouldn’t always tell the US Army and - well, too bad for AQI. The AQI would prefer to be in the hands of the Americans rather than the Iraqis or the civilian authorities. That is what so many people don’t understand.
No matter what everything looks like or what the media wants to say, the boots on the ground have had the hardest job, have paid the greatest price for it, and have worked harder with the Iraqis and the Afghanis than any member of congress, the right, the left, MoveOn, George Soros, or any conservative group. They can all sit around and yell and scream and decide what should be done, but many of their actions cause unintended consequences resulting in civilians and soldiers dying.
I cannot tell you how opposed to torture I am, but all of this brouhaha and releasing more photos may cause more problems in the mid East and ignite it once again. How many of our children and relatives will be killed? How many civilians? What are the unintended consequences to the troops on the ground? No one seems to want to look at those questions, we have become a talk show nation where someone’s words become more important than soldiers and civilians lives.
I do believe our country has to lead the way on this, hopefully it can change some of the mindset of the world. I don’t know because they always operate out of their own interests.
Water boarding as it is currently described involves strapping a person to an inclined board, with his feet raised and his head lowered. The interrogators bind the person’s arms and legs so he can’t move at all, and they cover his face. In some descriptions, the person is gagged, and some sort of cloth covers his nose and mouth; in others, his face is wrapped in cellophane. The interrogator then repeatedly pours water onto the person’s face. Depending on the exact setup, the water may or may not actually get into the person’s mouth and nose; but the physical experience of being underneath a wave of water seems to be secondary to the psychological experience. The person’s mind believes he is drowning, and his gag reflex kicks in as if he were choking on all that water falling on his face.
Where is the light here? He doesn’t even know what waterboarding IS, he should stick his head in a bucket and do us all a favor.