Elizabeth Edwards on Oprah | 05/08/2009 8:30 am
Friends Think John and Elizabeth Edwards Will Stick Together; Rielle Hunter Wants DNA Test

Despite the very public shame and humiliation John and Elizabeth Edwards have endured since news broke about John’s affair with a campaign worker — and a possible illegitimate child — family friends say they have no doubt the couple will stick together.
"John and Elizabeth still love one another," friend John Moylan told People.com. "I think they will make it through."
But what if it turns out the baby born to John Edwards’ ex-mistress Rielle Hunter is his? Hunter is now demanding that John submit to a DNA test, reports the National Enquirer. Sources said Hunter is working with a lawyer to determine the paternity of her 14-month-old daughter, Frances. Elizabeth told Oprah Winfrey Thursday that it doesn’t matter to her whether the child is John’s or not.
"Whatever the facts are doesn’t change my life … [it’s] completely extraneous to my life," Elizabeth said. If the baby was proven to be her husband’s, then, she added, "that would be part of John’s life, not mine."
Elizabeth’s interview on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" revealed that the wife of the former North Carolina senator staunchly maintains this affair will not define her life, saying he "is a really good man, who, you know, did a really bad thing. If you take that piece out, I do have a perfect marriage." While Elizabeth blames her husband for the affair (though she still says to this day he doesn’t know why he did it), she also railed against Hunter — to whom she kept referring as "this person" — for essentially preying on John and trying to ruin the wonderful life Elizabeth had built.
"Women — you need to have respect for other women," she said vehemently. "There’s no excuse for women to do this … don’t just try to come in and take somebody else’s life." As to whether Hunter’s daughter shares her husband’s DNA, Elizabeth said she and John don’t know for sure, but it doesn’t matter one way or the other to her.
Elizabeth still loves her husband, although whether she’s "in love" with him is a "complicated question." As for John, the former presidential hopeful said he really didn’t know if his wife of 30 years would leave him. Asked whether he was afraid she would, he said: "Um, yeah. I love her, I care about her."
"I think we’re getting to a good place. It’s not over but I think we’re getting to a good place," he told Oprah.
With more interviews planned and book tours on the way, some who know the family are wondering why Elizabeth — with John’s acquiescence — decided to air their dirty laundry.
"The risk is that it stirs up a lot of ugliness and unpleasantness,” Gary Pearce, a Democratic strategist who helped John Edwards win a 1998 Senate race, told The Charlotte Observer.























41 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Nanchan…I think there was some bargaining going on here also….and it is questionable why now??? Maybe she watched the interview too??? She will be writing a book next….do ya suppose?
You know…in many many cultures….European, Asian, Latin, Italian—having a mistress is ‘normal’ and expected….A mistress is a dalliance, not a committment. It is ‘human’——in America, in many ‘circles’, wives even expect their husbands will dally now and then. Any one, man or woman, who is deemed to have power, is subject to fooling around—‘because they can’—-easily!
Heart wrenching for the wife?—-perhaps….perhaps not…In this case, Edwards is highly visible, so it gets smeared all over the media—‘bad boy, baaaaadddd boy’—-but it happens all the time, doesn;t it? Especially when the urge of humans is to experience as much of life as possible, and that includes the urge to merge…..
I feel bad for Elizabeth Edwards—-had the media not delved in such a diligent way to uncover dirt on John Edwards, this bridge might have been walked over in a more delicate and private way……Elizabeth was publicly stabbed, and she is publicly stabbing back…..and there are many who thrive on other peoples’ pain….so sad…
What is curious to me, however, is tht a DNA test has not yet been done—-to prove one way or the other—-so IMO, it seems that John Edwards is being beaten up by the media, and declared Guilty, before any legal evidence has been offered….so what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Oh, I know he has admitted to sleeping with Hunter—-but how many other men could have contributed to the creation of that child? Wouldn’t it be a hoot if the DNA proved this child was not his?
"had the media not delved in such a diligent way to uncover dirt on John Edwards, this bridge might have been walked over in a more delicate and private way"
Patty, you must be joking, right? The media was dragged, kicking and screaming, into this story! It was only after it had been widely circulated on the internet did the mainstream media even touch it!
"You know…in many many cultures….European, Asian, Latin, Italian—having a mistress is ‘normal’ and expected…"
So what? In many cultures, rape, child marriage and slavery are also considered normal and/or expected…does that legitimize them, too? Of course not. In American culture, it’s expected that you keep your commitments; fidelity is generally a commitment of marriage ("open marriages" excluded :P). The fact of the matter is, Edwards (who also went on about how, if a politician cheated on his spouse, he couldn’t be trusted, btw) betrayed his wife.
"but it happens all the time, doesn;t it? "
Maybe so, but, again, what does that prove?! Child marriage, rape, murder, drug smuggling, etc., etc., happen "all the time" in various parts of the world too. So what?! The frequency with which something is done has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the act. Betraying a spouse is wrong, period.
"What is curious to me, however, is tht a DNA test has not yet been done—-to prove one way or the other—-so IMO, it seems that John Edwards is being beaten up by the media, and declared Guilty, before any legal evidence has been offered….so what happened to innocent until proven guilty? "
How so? No one is saying that the child is his; not even Elizabeth cares to comment one way or another. The fact of the matter is that he is a very likely candidate for it!
"but how many other men could have contributed to the creation of that child? Wouldn’t it be a hoot if the DNA proved this child was not his?"
Who cares how many others might have? (The way you phrase that is also very interesting, btw…) And what would the big deal be, one way or the other? The fact of the matter is that, since John doesn’t know, he at least knows he risked creating a child with Hunter (while betraying his wife…). That’s the point.
You make a good point, Patty, dahling. In this country, thankfully, we have more than the "court of public opinion;" although, I’m not certain from whence an impartial jury would be found, once the scorned wife has appeared on "Oprah" discussing her book on the subject, do you, dear?
"Women — you need to have respect for other women," she said vehemently. "There’s no excuse for women to do this … don’t just try to come in and take somebody else’s life."
That’s all well and good, and I do agree with her; but where’s the equally vehement statement, "Men — you need to respect women! There’s no excuse for men to do this"??