Politics | 04/02/2009 11:30 am
Gingrich Warns of 'Third Party' Rise in 2012

Republican Newt Gingrich, the former house speaker who has suddenly found himself in the spotlight again, warned this week that a third party could change the nation’s political game come 2012. Addressing students at the College of the Ozarks, Mr. Gingrich insisted the Republican Party’s right-wing status could pave the way for a new party’s ascension: "If the Republicans can’t break out of being the right-wing party of government, then I think you would see a third-party movement in 2012." The government’s so "sick," he said, that voters may launch an electoral revolution in the polls.
Gingrich later admitted that the GOP must take some of the blame for the nation’s current crisis, including an inflation in government spending, according to CNN: "If you’re going to talk about big spending, the mistakes of the Bush administration last year are fully as bad as the mistakes of Obama’s first two, three months.”
The 65-year-old also said that he’ll decide in a few years whether or not he wants to run for the White House. And, we’re sure, he’s waiting to see how viable his party will be after the 2010 senatorial and gubernatorial elections. Gingrich himself seems to be doing well among his party peers: He replaced former darling Sarah Palin as the keynote speaker at a GOP fund-raiser dinner























86 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
2012 is not the year for a third party. Once Obama is out and away from the taxpayers money, then maybe. A financially strong Republican Party with a good candidate and a good message is what we need for 2012. If the Republicans choose Gingrich, then maybe they deserve to lose.
I’m with Deber on this. No WAY will Newt come close to getting a nomination.
The next few years will see a dramatic change in the Republican Party, that’s for sure. And like any change, it will be painful. We have to stay the course and address the issues within our party and bring it back.
"If you’re going to talk about big spending, the mistakes of the Bush administration last year are fully as bad as the mistakes of Obama’s first two, three months.”
Well, now, Newt, you certainly got that right! Actually, Bush’s deficit is miniscule compared to Obama’s debt in less than 100 days.
This comment, however, is rather cheeky and in very very poor taste:
"He replaced former darling Sarah Palin as the keynote speaker at a GOP fund-raiser dinner." Anything to keep Sarah Palin in the news!
Amanda, how do you know she doesn’t?
Hi, Amanda:
Just goes to show, stupid is as stupid does. I really wanted to like both of the female candidates, and I do like Mrs. Clinton a lot better than I did before she ran for President. She’s a lot smarter and shrewder than I realized - and a hell of a lot tougher. Whether I personally like the woman or not is irrelevant; I respect her for always being exactly who and what she has always been.
Now, having said that, I’ll say this: Former Governor Palin is frivolous, silly - and dumber than a box of rocks. "Perky" does not get the job done, and the ReThugs (NOT the general run of Republicans, but folks like Mr. Gingrich) love her because she, basically, is no threat to them. She’s a jazzed-up version of June Cleaver, but unlike Mrs. Cleaver, completely clueless. She is also - and I find this the most unforgiveable thing about her - a quitter. When the going got rough, she ducked and ran. She’s still ducking and running. She will always duck and run - and I shudder to think what she’d do if - UNTHINKABLY - she actually was the President.
Maybe, I need to go clean out the bomb shelter!