Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Poll | 07/15/2009 11:00 pm

Have you changed your opinion of Sonia Sotomayor since the start of her confirmation hearings?

88 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

James the Game

Sonyia’s a shoe-in, as far as I can discern. She seems fair-minded.

Frankly, these confirmation hearings have become made-for-television, dog-and-pony shows in recent years. Many of the politicians preen for the controversy-thirsty, 24/7 TV networks, asking one insipid question after the next. I envisage an hour glass, with valuable time and taxpayer dollars slipping away by the minute, when these clowns could be putting their time to better use.

Please, approve this lady already, so the networks can get to their next scandal-dujour, and Congress can get to something a speck more important during this national time of crisis. I mean, what would be the sense of NOT approving her? It’s not like Obama & Co. would offer up Phyllis Schlafly as a substitute, if Sotomayor were to be shot down in flames. - James

By James the Game on 07/16/2009 12:30 am
James the Game
Okay, lazy James forgot to spell Sonia’s first name correctly.
By James the Game on 07/16/2009 12:32 am
Murphy Mac
Hi ya, James! Glad you’re up and typing. I agree with your statements and I agree Sonia should be confirmed!
By Murphy Mac on 07/16/2009 6:37 am
James the Game

Thanks, Murph. Yeah, I was up-down like a yo-yo last night. Grogginess finally dissipated by 8 a.m., when I got up "for good". And the headache/nausea were gone. I feel great. It’s 70, sunny, and a nice, gusty breeze. Glad to be alive! Hopefully, my hearing will improve now! They take the internal packing out of the ear at post-op next week.

Speaking of hearing, that Sotomayor hearing has gotten bizarre.

By James the Game on 07/16/2009 4:47 pm
Kelly In Texas

James…all of your "girls" are wishing you a speedy recovery ;] Hope all goes to plan! But then…no more excuses for "selective male hearing"!!!

On the Sotomayor hearing….I do not respect that she has attempted to minimalize her infamous "wise Latina" statement. She repeated that exact sentiment over 6 separate times…in numerous situations. She must be very invested in that sentiment to go back to it, time and time again. A one time mis statement, it is not.

Like it or not, she obviously practices identity politics. That much is clear. We are stuck with her and nothing will change that, now.

By Kelly In Texas on 07/17/2009 2:20 pm
James the Game
Thanks, Kelly. I’ve been too in and out of it this week to watch hardly any of it, other than the snippets on the news. Here’s a shot of the Mackinac Bridge (MAK-ih-naw) in Michigan for you: http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=mackinac+bridge&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=I-dgSsjXKpKutgeljsjFDA&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=5
By James the Game on 07/17/2009 4:07 pm
Kelly In Texas

Thanks James…wow…so many beautiful views of one bridge! (that wasn’t a veiled suggestion for me to go jump off one, was it?)

Xo…

By Kelly In Texas on 07/17/2009 4:38 pm
Kelly In Texas

In my opinion, the second amendment is the reason that Sotomayor was the Obama pick….

"The most interesting exchange thus far occurred when Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., asked Sotomayor about a 2004 opinion, which she signed, that found that ‘the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.’

“Coburn wondered how courts cannot see the explicitly stated Second Amendment ‘right to keep and bear arms’ as fundamental, yet can hold as fundamental the unexpressed right to privacy. Sotomayor answered: ‘Is there a constitutional right to self-defense? And I can’t think of one. I could be wrong, but I can’t think of one.’

“For eight years, Democrats attacked the Bush administration for giving short shrift to personal liberties. As Obama wrote in ‘Audacity,’ the Bush picks ‘showed a pattern of hostility toward civil rights, privacy and checks on executive power.’

“Now the Obama pick for the Supreme Court can’t think of a right to defend yourself. That is arguably extraordinary.”

— Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle Syndicated Columnist

By Kelly In Texas on 07/17/2009 2:27 pm
beth willis

Yeah, Coburn is the voice of respect and integrity, invoking the ‘Ricky Ricardo’ imitation.  Sotomayor made the point that the words ‘self-defense’ did not appear in the Constitution.  One should remember that George H W Bush appointed her to the district court.  The word ‘Education’  also does not appear in the Constitution.

Peace and grace

By beth willis on 07/17/2009 3:45 pm
Kelly In Texas

beth…I could care less who appointed her to the district court…we are talking about a lifelong appointment here. Nothing in your response spoke to her position on the 2nd amendment…I see a problem with that and her numerous racial comments.

I also do not like what she did with the firefighters. There is a problem there with her, in my opinion.

By Kelly In Texas on 07/17/2009 4:42 pm
Chris Broersma
I agree James.  It seems like it is already a done deal and there has been little new information that has come from these hearings.
By Chris Broersma on 07/16/2009 12:58 am
C jay

It does seem like our precious elected stand on ceremond, doesn’t it, James. But, it isn’t doing much for the detractors, seems a deliberate attempt to detract, and retract. It hasn’t feathered their nests one bit. In fact, I wanted to fax 1 or 2 of them, "WAKE UP!"

 

By C jay on 07/16/2009 1:42 am
James the Game
Mostly, C jay, our precious elected sit on ceremony. They need to get off their duffs.
By James the Game on 07/16/2009 1:58 am
Andrea Brandon
No, no, no……don’t approve or disapprove her  yet. If you do, then they’ll go straight back to Jackson stuff.
By Andrea Brandon on 07/16/2009 11:36 am
James the Game
You’re right, Andrea! Never thought of that! In fact, I’m surprised we haven’t heard an announcement of the new "MTV" network (Michael television). And I liked his dancing; I’m no M.J. hater.
By James the Game on 07/16/2009 4:58 pm