Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Hijab, Muslim Head Scarf | 03/20/2009 12:25 pm

Islamic Head Scarf Sparks Controversy in Norway (Video)

By The Staff at wowOwow.com

A Muslim woman’s request to wear a hijab with her police uniform in Norway has caused an uproar.

Norwegian officials first OK’d the request, but then did an about-face after the police union said it breached the neutrality of the uniform. The Christian Science Monitor reports that the brouhaha led the justice minister to take a two-week sick leave. The country’s Progress Party claims that accepting the hijab is all a part of "sneak Islamization."

Tensions have been simmering for a while; a head scarf was burned in protest on International Women’s Day. Needless to say, the head-scarf hullabaloo is causing quite a lot of distress in Norway — and all just six months before the general elections. It remains to be seen what effect, if any, the current controversy will have on the nation’s political affairs.

Here’s video of Norwegian women burning the hijab:

16 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
I don’t understand the head scarf burning. What was the point? The woman burning it was wearing one.
By DeBúrca obj on 03/20/2009 12:35 pm
canuck canuck

I think it may have been trying to say that wearing a head scarf is demeaning to women? I don’t see the point of what they did either. The wearing of head cover is often used in many religions. Wearing head coverage is done out of respect for what they believe in. I can remember my mother had some beautiful ones she wore to church (she is Catholic) back in the days when all Catholic women covered their heads in church.

By canuck canuck on 03/20/2009 1:12 pm
Rachel F
You’re talking about a woman covering her head out of respect to God while in "the house of God"; they’re protesting that they *have* to wear them to remain Muslims and, oftentimes, alive (things like refusing to wear the hijab have cost many girls their lives). The Koran does not order it. The doctrine is created because Muhammad had his wives do the same; and many radicals think that, if the prophet’s women did it, regular ones had better to (and women, of course, have no say as far as radicals are concerned). But it was not even ordered by Muhammad or Allah.
By Rachel F on 03/20/2009 3:23 pm
K C

Actually its not about to ‘have’ to wear a hijab to remain a Muslim.  A woman is a Muslim wether or not she has it or not.  Muhammad did not "order" his wives to cover themselves.  It was a way of the wives distinguishing them from other women.  But once Islam began to spread, other women chose to adopt it. 

Also, in the Quran it states that both men and women must protect their modesty.  Unfortunately fanatics have taken this to the extreme in some Middle Eastern countries for women, this is true.  There are Muslim women, both born-in and converts, who choose to wear the hijab. 

The bottomline is: it’s not about supression, but about protecting modesty.   

By K C on 08/31/2009 2:14 pm
Rachel F

As I stated, it was never a directive to be/remain a Muslim. And, in Mohammad’s case, he had his wives take the veil because they were getting too much attention; he did not, however, dictate that other women had to do this. Extremists (such as the "morality police") HAVE and DO force women to dress a certain way, including wearing the veil, though. You can call it protecting modesty if you like…just like it’s "protecting" a woman’s decency to force her to always be accompanied by a male relative if she goes out, to dictate who she’ll marry, to forbid her to drive a car, to prevent her from life saving treatment if there are no female doctors, etc.

It seems clear to me that it’s not about protecting a woman’s modesty, but about possession and repression. A woman has a certain place, in their warped and closed-minded views, and it is sinful for her to step out of it. She is to be the property of a man, and no one but that man is to see her. It’s a primitive mindset. Unfortunately, people have chosen and continue to choose to enshrine in it in a religion that did not even dictate that they do so (just as they did with Christianity, etc.). It’s never about protecting a woman; it’s about protecting a man’s possession, and keeping the woman in her place.

By Rachel F on 08/31/2009 2:31 pm
C Hardy

Having a husband who is a cop, I dont know Norway police have to wear hats but if so then the hat, which is part of the uniform, would cover the scarf.  I could see if she refused to wear the hat due to the scarf but as long as she was in full uniform does it really matter what she had on under it? 

By C Hardy on 03/20/2009 1:28 pm
deber B

When in Norway, do as the Norwegians do!   If this woman applied to become a policewoman in Norway, she should wear their uniform as required.    If she is uncomfortable doing that she needs to find another job where her clothing/head scarf  isn’t an issue.  

 

By deber B on 03/20/2009 2:40 pm
Rachel F

Exactly. When American female politicians and wives of politicians head to the middle east, they cover their heads (Laura Bush, Pelosi, etc.).

The simple fact of the matter is that significant segments of the Muslim population use scarves, burqas, etc., to keep women "under control". To enshrine in it public uniform, etc., does a disservice to those women, who are prisoners of a concept that is not even commanded by their god, Allah. 

Many women claim that they "want" to wear the hijab, burqa, etc.; some do, and others are taught that to think otherwise is to "betray god". European culture had the same problems, though they manifested in different ways; it was a "woman’s duty" to subject herself to her husband, raise kids, stay home, etc., etc. Do you really think that, for centuries, European women were brooding feminists, waiting for liberation? Heck no. They were kept prisoner by ideology, that it was "god’s commandment" that they do as they were told, and that they would be "sinning against god" to do otherwise. We need to respect other cultures and points of view, but we also need to respect human rights — and, when they come in conflict, we need to side with human rights. 

By Rachel F on 03/20/2009 3:32 pm
deber B
Well stated,Rachel
By deber B on 03/20/2009 4:23 pm
Rachel F
Thanks. :-)
By Rachel F on 03/20/2009 8:28 pm
K C
Rachel, again it is definately not about control.  There are countries who do take it to the extreme, but hijabs are not about control.
By K C on 08/31/2009 2:16 pm
DeBúrca obj
I agree. It’s similar to the idea that people who take jobs as pharmacists refusing to fill certain prescriptions because of their "religious beliefs". If you’re going to take a job and know the requirements, either do the job as is, or don’t take the job.
By DeBúrca obj on 03/20/2009 3:58 pm
Rachel F
Agreed.
By Rachel F on 03/20/2009 8:27 pm
canuck canuck
Now I get it! In Canada there was a huge uproar over east Indians becoming RCMP Officers - and wearing turbans. The right to wear the turbans won out because in countries with socialized programs the rights of the individual become more important than the law. They also have some tough helmet laws up there regarding bikes etc. But the east Indians are exempt from that as well.
By canuck canuck on 03/20/2009 7:42 pm
Ms. Dee
Reminds me of all the bra-burning we saw over here in the sixties.
By Ms. Dee on 03/22/2009 10:50 pm