Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Ganz Cooney | 03/23/2009 6:00 am

Joan Ganz Cooney: Where Are the Wisemen Behind the Man?

Joan Ganz Cooney
I’ve been ruminating about what is missing by way of advisers in the White House. Our new president is certainly surrounded with some very smart people both in the White House itself and in the Cabinet. What I miss though is the sense that there is an old wise head whom he talks to late at night after he’s heard from those who are very close to the situation, including his political advisers (e.g., David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs). I mean someone who is not involved in day-to-day problems and politics, who probably doesn’t work for the administration, who has seen a lot of presidents come and go and has been around the block a few times. Someone, in other words, who has no ax to grind and is not looking for power and is not competing for the president’s ear. We have seen such in the past: the Washington lawyer, Bob Strauss, who has privately advised many presidents; Clark Clifford who was there for Lyndon Johnson among others; Lloyd Cutler who was brought into the White House by President Clinton to calm things down.

I feel the need, on behalf of Obama, for a pragmatist who is smart, not particularly partisan, who sees the larger picture and does not get too excited about populist outcries and the like. Paul Volker is clearly such a man but is seldom called upon, probably because Obama is relying on the people who work for him, some of whom may not be too happy at the idea of a late-night impartial adviser to the president.

Years ago, a man named Eugene V. Debs Myers was press secretary to Mayor Wagner. Debs, who died long before he should have, was overweight by at least 50 pounds and drank two or three drinks at lunch every day, was funny and popular and an outspoken pragmatist. During his tenure, there was a terrible crime wave in the subways. Subway crime stories filled the newspapers day after day and a political crisis seemed imminent. All kinds of crime experts and others were called in for advice. At the peak of the crisis, Debs went out to lunch, had a few drinks, returned, and put his head in the doorway of the mayor’s office and said, "Mayor, put more cops on the subways." The next day, the mayor’s office announced there would be a cop on every subway. Overnight there was almost zero crime on the subways and the demands for Mayor Wagner’s head ceased. 

I wish I saw a Debs Myers on the White House scene but I don’t.

56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

WowedbywowOwow NYC
A wiseperson, someone above the fray should be welcomed by the Obama administration. Unfortunately, as evidenced by their response to the AIG bonus debacle, Obama and his aides, like the ethically challenged members of the House, are mired in partisan politics, have lost control of the Democratic party and have resorted to pandering to the mob. 
By WowedbywowOwow NYC on 03/23/2009 7:54 am
Frannie Em

To me, it seems that part of the problem is the internet.  Now communication is so quick that MediaMatters and MoveOn hear that the Blue Dog democrats are stalling in passing the budget so they send out email to phone banks that will then hammer the phone lines and emails to the Blue Dog Democrats insisting America wants the budget passed.  Then it seems, feeling under massive public pressure, our congress people over react, as in the case of the AIG bonuses.  It has become a circus and a few factions are winning the war through the internet. Once MoveOn and MediaMatters decided Obama was their candidate they made a concerted effort to discredit Hillary.  

Most polls say that people want the budget trimmed and not a $3trillion deficit this year.  

 

By Frannie Em on 03/23/2009 2:47 pm
georgia g
I would disagree that the internet is the problem, but would offer that the problem is unvetted information thrown out there for consumption.  It then becomes the consumer’s responsibility to cross check and research.  That said, MediaMatters.org is an oversight group that vets information for innacuracies, not a political group like MoveOn.  I have experience with polling, and the best advice I would give, is that unless every single person (including you) has participated, they are always subject to being entirely wrong, and essentially meaningless- mostly they are done to make the point of the person paying for the poll. 
By georgia g on 06/22/2009 8:07 am
Frannie Em

I am aware that MediaMatters is (supposedly) an oversight group, but many people read them and believe everything they say. When I first heard about them over a year ago I thought someone finally had a great idea and decided I would check them out.  On some stories they gave a pretty good analysis but on many they were totally wrong.  It was obvious they hadn’t even listened to what they were vetting.  They made some statements that were out and out lies.  Not just because of ideology, but accuracy.  I remember they said some station did not carry the democrat rebuttal to then Pres Bush’s state of the Union and they were totally wrong, I had seen the program and MediaMatters out and out lied about the content.  Seemed like they didn’t vet the source they had counted on to vet the stories.  I was surprised.  Point is, in their inaccuracies they influence political thought.

Oddly enough, as an independent I am polled quite a bit.  I get phone calls from both sides asking me questions, and I am certainly aware that when I am asked that they are looking for a certain answer.  I think because I am a social liberal and a fiscal conservative they are surprised by my answers.  I remember one young man who left the conversation telling me that now he saw it a little differently.  That is rare, but some of them are chatty, some are done on machines and some are just a quick couple of questions.  I have been polled enough and I am not naive.

If in my haste of posting, I overstated about MediaMatters - I knew what I was doing at the time just didn’t want to fix it, but moveon does use those tactics, I have friends that get emails anytime MoveOn needed more money to support Obama during the campaign.  They do have phone banks set up as well as MoveOn and others have access to the WH every morning for an 8:45am conference call regarding selling the administrations plans to the public.  Seems to me that is a little manipulative and almost propagandizing.  I always wonder if both sides would ever get that what really counts if having integrity while serving the public.  They wouldn’t have to sell themselves to special interests to the extent that they do just to get elected.  Don’t forget, it cost almost a billion dollars to the Pres Obama elected. 

By Frannie Em on 06/22/2009 5:32 pm
georgia g
Frannie Em- sorry if I sounded too critical- didn’t mean to be.  If you found errors with MediaMatters they should be reported!  I know that during the previous administration they were highly critical of politically driven propaganda, but I find also that they are busy with this new administration’s side-stepping and back-tracking. Other very good groups for truth sourcing are ProPublica.org and FactCheck.org.  As a graduate student in Political Science I was very often frustrated by "facts" that really weren’t and polls that were meaningless if not purposely deceptive.  Very often there is no truth at all in the end, only motives.   Buyer beware. 
By georgia g on 06/22/2009 6:49 pm
Gramma J

That is a good and thoughtful point, Joan.  There needs to somebody who doesn’t have a vested interest in either party, who doesn’t have an agenda, is independent and SMART to offer input.  Do you have any suggestions as to where such a person is to be found?

By Gramma J on 03/23/2009 8:21 am
Mary Quite-Contrary

I agree that a non-political, not gonna run for anything him/herself, old enough to not worry about ‘resume padding’ is needed. 

 However, I see the narcissism of those who surround Obama as unwilling to ‘allow’ any other agenda or theories to be presented.  Emmanuel runs a a tight, vindictive ship.  No room on board for discourse, its Chicago politics on the Potomoac.  Previously, here, I described Gibbs as ‘sophmoric.’  I retract that…his demeanor and furtitive attempts at humor put him back in the Middle School cafeteria.

By Mary Quite-Contrary on 03/23/2009 8:23 am
deber B
Henry Kissinger and James Baker come to mind.   Obama seems to have surrounded himself with ivy league mentalities with law degrees.   I am of the opinion that the difference is that Obama has brought Chicago politics to the White House.   It’s a different breed.
By deber B on 03/23/2009 8:28 am
Mary Quite-Contrary
Actually, Colin Powell, who supported Obama during the campaign, would be a good choice of Senior advisor. However, I saw, even back then I saw that he would not be utlized because of his connection to the Bush years (BDS again?). Again I think the “party above all” mentality rules.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 03/23/2009 9:20 am
deber B
A pity isn’t it? 
By deber B on 03/23/2009 9:27 am
Green Tears

Yes, deber, do I detect a bit of youthful arrogance on the part of this administration?

Your mention of Kissinger and Baker was excellent - surely there have to be a few more of those great resources around for the president to seek counsel from.

By Green Tears on 03/23/2009 11:49 am
deber B

Green Tears, I believe you do!

Kissinger and Baker are as solid as a rock and they’ve seen it all in Washington.   I haven’t done any research on other great mentors.  I know there must be great people sitting in the wings, retired, writing their memoirs, etc.   Maybe we need to ask the audience…..anyone out there have any suggestions?   You can phone a friend.

By deber B on 03/23/2009 12:24 pm
Mel Berg
Mary, you know I think Colin Powell would be a good choice also.
By Mel Berg on 03/23/2009 10:46 am
Zera Lee
Powell is not an option. His expertise is more in the military, not political arena. Last time he tried serving in an administration, he got badly burned by Bush. He has already said that he would not serve again, and repeated it when people started speculating on his possible participation in the Obama administration. He is a very good man, but not senior adviser material. Obama is trying to run things as close to bipartisan as he can, but is not getting cooperation from either side of the aisle in Congress. The Democrats are eclectic at best, and the republicans are turning viciously on any member caught reaching across the aisle.
By Zera Lee on 03/23/2009 4:40 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary
Powell’s military experience is also valuable in terms of advising on foreign policy. I think his quote was he didn’t want an appointment; but in any event…some mature thought and wisdom would be a help. As to bipartisanship…all I can say is wow (and I don’t mean this cyberboard); Pelosi/Reid have pretty much built a mote around the Hill, daring any Republican (or blue dog Dem) to try and swim across.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 03/23/2009 6:36 pm