Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Ganz Cooney | 03/23/2009 6:00 am

Joan Ganz Cooney: Where Are the Wisemen Behind the Man?

Joan Ganz Cooney
I’ve been ruminating about what is missing by way of advisers in the White House. Our new president is certainly surrounded with some very smart people both in the White House itself and in the Cabinet. What I miss though is the sense that there is an old wise head whom he talks to late at night after he’s heard from those who are very close to the situation, including his political advisers (e.g., David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs). I mean someone who is not involved in day-to-day problems and politics, who probably doesn’t work for the administration, who has seen a lot of presidents come and go and has been around the block a few times. Someone, in other words, who has no ax to grind and is not looking for power and is not competing for the president’s ear. We have seen such in the past: the Washington lawyer, Bob Strauss, who has privately advised many presidents; Clark Clifford who was there for Lyndon Johnson among others; Lloyd Cutler who was brought into the White House by President Clinton to calm things down.

I feel the need, on behalf of Obama, for a pragmatist who is smart, not particularly partisan, who sees the larger picture and does not get too excited about populist outcries and the like. Paul Volker is clearly such a man but is seldom called upon, probably because Obama is relying on the people who work for him, some of whom may not be too happy at the idea of a late-night impartial adviser to the president.

Years ago, a man named Eugene V. Debs Myers was press secretary to Mayor Wagner. Debs, who died long before he should have, was overweight by at least 50 pounds and drank two or three drinks at lunch every day, was funny and popular and an outspoken pragmatist. During his tenure, there was a terrible crime wave in the subways. Subway crime stories filled the newspapers day after day and a political crisis seemed imminent. All kinds of crime experts and others were called in for advice. At the peak of the crisis, Debs went out to lunch, had a few drinks, returned, and put his head in the doorway of the mayor’s office and said, "Mayor, put more cops on the subways." The next day, the mayor’s office announced there would be a cop on every subway. Overnight there was almost zero crime on the subways and the demands for Mayor Wagner’s head ceased. 

I wish I saw a Debs Myers on the White House scene but I don’t.

56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

caj p
Obama is bringing to the White House whom he sees fit, he runs his own ship and is entitled to choose who ever he likes.  People seem to forget who actually runs the show now, the Reps chose who they wanted when they were in power and Obama can choose who he wants now.  It may not sit well with those on the outside but that I’m afraid is too bad.
By caj p on 03/23/2009 8:38 am
deber B
That’s the issue, caj p "who Obama sees as fit."  
By deber B on 03/23/2009 9:28 am
caj p
Well who is the President….did Bush not choose his own people?  This all becomes so one sided on here because most don’t like Obama to start with and want him to do the bidding of want the Reps think he should do or choose who they think he should choose.  Did anyone question Bush over his advisers, that was his choice to make?  Intolerance for this President is overwhelming from those on the right on here, that is unbelievable and very sad.  Still, they can all rant and rave and make remarks that really belong in a child’s book at times it won’t change the fact that this President will change turn this country around.  Whatever will they all do when that happens are they going to have to go into hiding on here as their source of complaint will now be the man who saved this country from ruin.
By caj p on 03/23/2009 11:10 am
deber B

caj p, you might want to reread what this thread is about because you misunderstood my post.  

By deber B on 03/23/2009 11:50 am
Frannie Em

Caj

The some of the president’s appointments must be confirmed by congress, he can choose who he wants, but many must be confirmed. 

By Frannie Em on 03/23/2009 2:49 pm
caj p

I just said he chooses who he wants to have but of course they have to be approved and confirmed first.

By caj p on 03/23/2009 4:28 pm
Kelly In Texas

I can’t agree with you more…." That I’m afraid, is too bad".

It is very, very, bad for our country. Obama is lost in Washington with Pelosi and the special interests pulling him into their fray. He is lost without his teleprompter and he is lost without a mentor to lead him by his nose. Pelosi will not allow any "outsider" in interfere with this monopoly game. Not when she is so close to owning Park Place and running the board.

Being President is much different than being the special pick of the litter to carry a message. He was groomed to step into this position by those that surround him now. It is not good. The only hope America has, is if he wakes up and decides that HE is really President and must stop the maddness that has been started in his name.

But with a spouse such as Michelle, he will never have the personal moments needed to reflect on what he has put into motion and what he has been manipulated to do to our country. She would never allow an "outsider" in either.

As was pointed out during the campaign, you are judged by the company you keep. We were all warned, most ignored the facts and truths before them. What made anyone think that he would surround himself in Washington with anyone other than the ones that helped him into power?

 

By Kelly In Texas on 03/27/2009 10:18 am
caj p
I don’t know what you mean by having a spouse like Michelle!!  What are you inferring there?  She is totally loyal to his vision and her role as First Lady. I don’t know what you are getting at!!!  The teleprompter is irrelevant and that old buzz word has been used to death I think we are all over that.  As much as you don’t agree by sound of it, we have elected the right man for the job and one who is doing a great job getting this country back on track.  So much disappointment still for so many but that can’t be helped, time to move on and far away as possible from the old policies of the Bush era many of whom have got us into this mess.
By caj p on 03/27/2009 11:25 am
Kelly In Texas

I apologize, I did not intend to "infer" anything. I intended to be quite clear about Michelle Obama. She will give her husband no room to grow into the President that he may be capable of being. She is a marxist as well and she will push him to stand firm on their agenda.

I am certain that she is "loyal" to her vision as First Lady. That is the problem, HER vision. She is dead set on expressing her vision hell or high water and damn those that don’t agree.

The teleprompter issue is very telling. Obama does not speak from his heart, nor his memory. That should be worrisome for all. It is a script, so to speak, of how he wants to be seen. It is not the reality of the man at the moment.

The only true buzz word is "Bush". It seems that many need to "move on" from that and pay attention to what is unfolding now.

By Kelly In Texas on 03/27/2009 12:16 pm
caj p
Where do you get the idea she is a Marxist?  Obama’s agenda is what we who voted for him want him to do, all this talk of socialism and too much Gov are just typical Reps response to anything Obama does as it is so far removed from what Bush did.  We had 8 years of what Bush did and that is the reason why Obama won it’s very simple, people wanted change in Gov and they got it with Obama and he’s proving to be a very good President so far…up front and honest with the American people we never saw much if any of that during the Bush years.  I am not aware Michelle is out there telling anybody what to do she justs speaks about things that interest her, she has been very visible as First Lady and has been commended for her out reach.  Because Obama uses a teleprompter, by the way Bush/Palin and others have also used them does not remotely mean he’s not talking from the heart….do you think he just reads any old thing that is put before him and relay it word for word without reading it before?  By the way he writes many of his speeches himself and because it gets put on a teleprompter doesn’t make it any less heartfelt.  We are moving on but when Bush has been such and integral part of so many blunders that have caused a lot of this mess we find ourselves in now it’s hard to totally dismiss him just because he is no longer President.
By caj p on 03/27/2009 2:12 pm
Kelly In Texas

Obama is anything but honest. He and his wife are using the American public to implement a socialist agenda in our country. But you are right about one thing…he was elected because of Bush.

To totally embrace all that Obama is pushing forward is fool hearty and dangerous. But some will only wake up to it when it is too late. They will be the ones still beating the "Bush" drum while America drowns in debt.

By Kelly In Texas on 03/27/2009 10:35 pm
caj p
Obama is pushing his agenda that America needs , we all know that socialist is another word from the Rep handbook which you all use over and over again.  It’s old hat now and it won’t wash with anyone other than those on the right, it’s been beaten to death and should be put to rest.  I would like someone from the right to explain to me if Bush policies were working so well how come millions have lost their jogs, no one can afford health care, jobs being sent overseas and letting the banks have free run to do what they liked!!!   His policies failed miserably and they are being changed to give the the average worker a chance for a change not to keep making the rich richer!!!
By caj p on 03/28/2009 9:55 am
Kelly In Texas
Socialist is the word that is on everyone lips, magazine covers, and out of the mouths of foreign leaders who themselves are socialist. To say that it is "a word from the Republican handbook" is disingenuous at best and bordering on deceitful. Soooo…trot out Bush again…that does not make Obama’s agenda any less socialist, does it? No it doesn’t. In a socialist society, an average worker is just the slave of the state. Only in a free market, capitalist society does the average worker have a chance at their dream. There may those that fear competition or fear that they may not succeed, for them, being average is comfortable. But only in America is there the opportunity to rise to the highest levels. Everyone is welcomed to remain average if they wish. Rich is not a bad thing. Most rich people are not bad people. Rich people hire other people, rich people create jobs and products. Class envy is what stops a society and a Nation from being the best that they can be. Class envy leads to mediocrity and low achievement.
By Kelly In Texas on 03/28/2009 6:23 pm
Kelly In Texas

Here what class envy will get you…. reducing tax deductions for the "rich"….

By Dick Morris:

In 2006, the most recent year for which data is available, four million taxpayers had adjusted gross incomes of $200,000 or more.  They comprised 3% of the tax returns, made 31% of the income, but donated 44% of all charitable contributions.  Together, they provided charity with $81 billion in that year.President Obama’s glib assertion that his reduction in tax deductions will not reduce donations is absurd.

Imagine all the harm Obama’s program will cause.  Churches will be hit most hard.  They account for the largest share of charitable donations, but universities, disease research, hospitals, soup kitchens, and cultural institutions will also be hard hit.  So will international relief efforts that funnel aid abroad through churches or directly.

It is totally dishonest for Obama to pretend that his curtailment of these deductions won’t hurt the poor.  It will most directly impact them since most of the charities Obama is hurting focus on helping the impoverished.

By Kelly In Texas on 03/28/2009 6:51 pm
caj p
Socialist is from the Rep handbook there’s nothing deceitful about it, it’s true….do you not all use it over and over?  You all see everything Obama does as socialist nothing else crosses your lips but that word.  Nothing wrong with being rich at all , but not at the expense of the less fortunate in society…all you folks on the right might think it’s great to make the rich richer and the poorer folks just have to scrape by but we don’t.  We believe in fairness all around, those who work hard on the lower rung of the ladder deserve to get a break and not keep giving taxes to those who haven’t got a clue how those folks down on the poverty level have to live.  The free market and capitalist society you folks keep banging on about has worked wonders over the past 8 years hasn’t it?  Millions out of work, folks losing their homes, jobs being shipped overseas, banks with no regulation and money grabbed by one and all and you all think that system works well…I beg to differ very strongly and it has been proved these past few years.  We like Obama’s plan for ALL working people not just the favoured few sitting in their ivory towers counting the millions they have stashed away in off shore accounts.  Now there’s a novel idea rich folks stashing money away to avoid paying taxes in this country….greed and corruption during the Bush years plain and simple.
By caj p on 03/28/2009 7:51 pm