Joan Ganz Cooney | 03/23/2009 6:00 am
Joan Ganz Cooney: Where Are the Wisemen Behind the Man?
I’ve been ruminating about what is missing by way of advisers in the White House. Our new president is certainly surrounded with some very smart people both in the White House itself and in the Cabinet. What I miss though is the sense that there is an old wise head whom he talks to late at night after he’s heard from those who are very close to the situation, including his political advisers (e.g., David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs). I mean someone who is not involved in day-to-day problems and politics, who probably doesn’t work for the administration, who has seen a lot of presidents come and go and has been around the block a few times. Someone, in other words, who has no ax to grind and is not looking for power and is not competing for the president’s ear. We have seen such in the past: the Washington lawyer, Bob Strauss, who has privately advised many presidents; Clark Clifford who was there for Lyndon Johnson among others; Lloyd Cutler who was brought into the White House by President Clinton to calm things down.
I feel the need, on behalf of Obama, for a pragmatist who is smart, not particularly partisan, who sees the larger picture and does not get too excited about populist outcries and the like. Paul Volker is clearly such a man but is seldom called upon, probably because Obama is relying on the people who work for him, some of whom may not be too happy at the idea of a late-night impartial adviser to the president.
Years ago, a man named Eugene V. Debs Myers was press secretary to Mayor Wagner. Debs, who died long before he should have, was overweight by at least 50 pounds and drank two or three drinks at lunch every day, was funny and popular and an outspoken pragmatist. During his tenure, there was a terrible crime wave in the subways. Subway crime stories filled the newspapers day after day and a political crisis seemed imminent. All kinds of crime experts and others were called in for advice. At the peak of the crisis, Debs went out to lunch, had a few drinks, returned, and put his head in the doorway of the mayor’s office and said, "Mayor, put more cops on the subways." The next day, the mayor’s office announced there would be a cop on every subway. Overnight there was almost zero crime on the subways and the demands for Mayor Wagner’s head ceased.
I wish I saw a Debs Myers on the White House scene but I don’t.
I feel the need, on behalf of Obama, for a pragmatist who is smart, not particularly partisan, who sees the larger picture and does not get too excited about populist outcries and the like. Paul Volker is clearly such a man but is seldom called upon, probably because Obama is relying on the people who work for him, some of whom may not be too happy at the idea of a late-night impartial adviser to the president.
Years ago, a man named Eugene V. Debs Myers was press secretary to Mayor Wagner. Debs, who died long before he should have, was overweight by at least 50 pounds and drank two or three drinks at lunch every day, was funny and popular and an outspoken pragmatist. During his tenure, there was a terrible crime wave in the subways. Subway crime stories filled the newspapers day after day and a political crisis seemed imminent. All kinds of crime experts and others were called in for advice. At the peak of the crisis, Debs went out to lunch, had a few drinks, returned, and put his head in the doorway of the mayor’s office and said, "Mayor, put more cops on the subways." The next day, the mayor’s office announced there would be a cop on every subway. Overnight there was almost zero crime on the subways and the demands for Mayor Wagner’s head ceased.
I wish I saw a Debs Myers on the White House scene but I don’t.
Read more about: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Bob Strauss, Clark Clifford, David Axelrod, Debs Myers, Lloyd Cutler, Lyndon B. Johnson, Mayor Wagner, New York City, News, Obama Administration, Paul Volker, Politics

























56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
caj p, you might want to reread what this thread is about because you misunderstood my post.
Caj
The some of the president’s appointments must be confirmed by congress, he can choose who he wants, but many must be confirmed.
I just said he chooses who he wants to have but of course they have to be approved and confirmed first.
I can’t agree with you more…." That I’m afraid, is too bad".
It is very, very, bad for our country. Obama is lost in Washington with Pelosi and the special interests pulling him into their fray. He is lost without his teleprompter and he is lost without a mentor to lead him by his nose. Pelosi will not allow any "outsider" in interfere with this monopoly game. Not when she is so close to owning Park Place and running the board.
Being President is much different than being the special pick of the litter to carry a message. He was groomed to step into this position by those that surround him now. It is not good. The only hope America has, is if he wakes up and decides that HE is really President and must stop the maddness that has been started in his name.
But with a spouse such as Michelle, he will never have the personal moments needed to reflect on what he has put into motion and what he has been manipulated to do to our country. She would never allow an "outsider" in either.
As was pointed out during the campaign, you are judged by the company you keep. We were all warned, most ignored the facts and truths before them. What made anyone think that he would surround himself in Washington with anyone other than the ones that helped him into power?
I apologize, I did not intend to "infer" anything. I intended to be quite clear about Michelle Obama. She will give her husband no room to grow into the President that he may be capable of being. She is a marxist as well and she will push him to stand firm on their agenda.
I am certain that she is "loyal" to her vision as First Lady. That is the problem, HER vision. She is dead set on expressing her vision hell or high water and damn those that don’t agree.
The teleprompter issue is very telling. Obama does not speak from his heart, nor his memory. That should be worrisome for all. It is a script, so to speak, of how he wants to be seen. It is not the reality of the man at the moment.
The only true buzz word is "Bush". It seems that many need to "move on" from that and pay attention to what is unfolding now.
Obama is anything but honest. He and his wife are using the American public to implement a socialist agenda in our country. But you are right about one thing…he was elected because of Bush.
To totally embrace all that Obama is pushing forward is fool hearty and dangerous. But some will only wake up to it when it is too late. They will be the ones still beating the "Bush" drum while America drowns in debt.
Here what class envy will get you…. reducing tax deductions for the "rich"….
By Dick Morris:
In 2006, the most recent year for which data is available, four million taxpayers had adjusted gross incomes of $200,000 or more. They comprised 3% of the tax returns, made 31% of the income, but donated 44% of all charitable contributions. Together, they provided charity with $81 billion in that year.President Obama’s glib assertion that his reduction in tax deductions will not reduce donations is absurd.
Imagine all the harm Obama’s program will cause. Churches will be hit most hard. They account for the largest share of charitable donations, but universities, disease research, hospitals, soup kitchens, and cultural institutions will also be hard hit. So will international relief efforts that funnel aid abroad through churches or directly.
It is totally dishonest for Obama to pretend that his curtailment of these deductions won’t hurt the poor. It will most directly impact them since most of the charities Obama is hurting focus on helping the impoverished.