Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 05/07/2009 3:30 pm

John Edwards Discusses Elizabeth's Book, Getting to 'Good Place' on Oprah (Video)

John Edwards tells Oprah he ‘didn’t know’ whether Elizabeth would leave him after affair.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com

Elizabeth Edwards appears on today’s episode of "Oprah," but it will no doubt be husband John’s cameo that gets people talking tonight.

Mrs. Edwards sat down with Oprah to discuss her new book, Resilience, which addresses her struggle with cancer and, yes, John’s affair with a former staffer, Rielle Hunter.

Edwards tells Oprah that she’s not sure whether Hunter’s baby belongs to John, a former senator who ran for president, but remains committed to their marriage.

Mr. Edwards wasn’t officially booked to chat with the talk-show queen, but did offer Oprah some of his time. During his brief appearance, Edwards described his wife’s book as "heartfelt" and "thoughtful," and said the decision to write it remained up to her: "I think that’s up to her. That’s what this book is about: it’s what’s inside her." The former senator also said he "didn’t know" whether Elizabeth would leave him after finding out about the affair, but definitely feared she would. Oprah asked whether or not the couple is in a good place, to which a seemingly teary Edwards replied, "I feel like we’re getting to it — it’s not over, but I think we’re getting to it."

Watch the clip, via Huffington Post:

17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Judy K.
I hope John has enough sense not to hurt Elizabeth again.  She is giving him a chance.  One more screwup and he wouldn’t be welcome visiting a pig farm.
By Judy K. on 05/07/2009 3:55 pm
DeBúrca obj
Edwards always gave me a creepy feeling, sort of reminds me of one of those southern fundamentalist preachers with a secret in the closet. During the 2008 election Edwards was actually saying things I most agreed with… but still he creeped me out. I thought at the time it was the way he blinks his eyes and looks to the side when he talks, a mannerism I have never liked, but maybe he just always gave out a vibe about the sort of person he really is.
By DeBúrca obj on 05/07/2009 3:59 pm
deber B
I happen to agree with you, Deburca.   His "ego" alone was a red flag.   I wouldn’t go so far to label all southern fundamentalist preachers as having secrets in the closests.   That is blatantly labeling all of them unfairly.  I do agree that he was creepy.    Remember his $400.00 haircuts?    That’s big ego.
By deber B on 05/08/2009 6:14 am
nanchan u

I’m glad he didn’t get into office.  If he can’t hire a decent barber/hairdresser and ends up overspending so much on his helmut hair, can you imagine what he would have done to our DEFICIT?

By nanchan u on 05/08/2009 6:28 am
deber B
I agree.   However your question posed another question "Could his deficit have matched  or exceeded President Obama’s in 100 days in office?  
By deber B on 05/08/2009 7:24 am
Beth Cornell
I agree, DeBurca, me too. I think he is a creep for doing this to Elizabeth. I always liked her. Funny for a Republican to say about a Democrat, but it is true I do. She is about as real as you can get.
By Beth Cornell on 05/07/2009 5:30 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary
Mr. Edwards, take Oprah’s hint…she didn’t book you; so slither yon…I feel for their children. The older girl lost her brother; and all three are losing their mother; their father is misting up for a talk show revelation on his affair (that probably produced a half sibling). I don’t understand the public mea culpas given the families situation. Sometimes discretion IS the better part of valor.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 05/07/2009 6:31 pm
Belinda Joy

A true sign of my shallowness. From the very first moment I heard about John Edwards, I admired him for the platform he chose to speak on, that being poverty in America. Far too many politicians forget about the poor. They give lip service, but never really care. He seemed to care AND is physically attractive, easy on the eyes.

But the moment is was confirmed with tangible proof he had betrayed his wife, because he could stoop so low as to cheat on a wife who has cancer, I thought this guy is scum, he can’t be trusted. I now don’t believe one word that comes from his mouth and know I probably never will. I wish I could be like others and accept his infidelity, but for some reason "his" cheating is more disgusting than others we have heard of.

By Belinda Joy on 05/07/2009 6:38 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary
No, no, no.  You are not shallow.  He is.  He, IMO, used issues like poverty (and the injured at birth children he used to represent) to ‘make him self’ appeal to voters (and juries).  He is one of those attornies…that give attornies a bad rap.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 05/07/2009 8:09 pm
nanchan u

I agree.

By nanchan u on 05/08/2009 7:27 am
Ruth Houston
As an infidelity expert who has been researching infidelity for the past 15 years, I am frequently called on by the media to comment on high profile infidelity and popular infidelity issues in the news. I think it is commendable for Elizabeth Edwards to share her intimate thoughts about her husband’s affair and its effect on her, and to speak so candidly about it in her interview with Oprah today.  By doing so, she has performed a valuable service to betrayed wives and other women with cheating mates. Usually the media coverage of high profile infidelity is all about the cheater  — who he is, why he did it, how he got caught, what it will mean to his career.  The betrayed wife’s voice is seldom heard.  Elizabeth has shown the public a side of infidelity that is seldom seen.  Betrayed wives need to know that they are not alone in what they are feeling or experiencing.  Men who are cheating, or who have cheated on their wives need to see and hear firsthand the hurt, humiliation and heartbreak they inflict when they get involved in extramarital affairs.  I feel that Elizabeth’s book and her interview with Oprah will help focus attention on aspects of infidelity that usually go unnoticed or ignored.  Further comments and insights based on portions of the book  that have been leaked to the public thus far, are posted on my blogs at  http://infidelitynewsandviews.blogspot.com and www.InfidelityAdvice.com
By Ruth Houston on 05/07/2009 8:55 pm
Sherry Hubbell

"Men who are cheating, or who have cheated on their wives need to see and hear firsthand the hurt, humiliation and heartbreak they inflict when they get involved in extramarital affairs."

I would hope that cheating spouses (husband and wives) do see the hurt, humiliation, and heartbreak they inflict on the personally affected parties.  I don’t see any point in a couple’s infidelity becoming fodder for public consumption.  It is in no way the public’s business how couples handle their private pain.  It shouldn’t matter to my neighbor down the street if my husband has strayed or if I have chosen to forgive him - or not.  And frankly, I don’t want to know if my neighbor, or my kid’s teacher, or a local politician has done this, either.  I’m not ready to be a voyeur to their problems or play judge/jury.

In the Edwardses’ case, it is unfortunately different for them because they are a highly visible, famous couple.  Having said that, however, it is truly no one else’s business how they handle this terrible situation.  If she is satisfied that he is truly remorseful and forgives him, then more power to her.  She has young children who still need their father and her own impending death to deal with.  If they choose to remain an intact family, so be it.

By Sherry Hubbell on 05/07/2009 9:52 pm
Bonnie Oliver

My first and only comment on the Edwards issue.  He is a cad;  she is attempting to come to grips with how big of jerk he is and her own inclusion in his attempt to hide his actions while a candidate.  There are children for whom a patched up legacy is important and, perhaps, that is her motive for writing the book.

I hope both will now disappear from newsprint.  They are no longer newsworthy.  As Dennis Miller said the other evening, the Edwards live in a 28,000 square foot house;  they need not see each other if they choose not to.

By Bonnie Oliver on 05/07/2009 9:56 pm
Libra Lady
Dennis Miller is correct…they may rarely cross paths in their big house….bet they each live on different sides….I think her writing the book was healing for her, but also it improved her self esteem…..sad that this is what she had to write about.
By Libra Lady on 05/07/2009 10:29 pm
Andrea Brandon

I don’t see what’s to be gained by her outing the Edwards’ family laundry. What possible purpose does it serve to have the children see her on all the websites and news programs, peddling her book?

So what then was the purpose of writing the book? Backlash of anger? Was it because it was a cathartic tool - or perhaps a means of getting back at John and leveling the playing field in her mind?

It’s been said that she is dying and supposedly has 1-10 more years. Assuming that’s correct, then she should make up her mind to make every minute count. What I’m trying to say [and doing a lousy job of it] is that as bad as cheating is, in the grand scheme of things it’s nothing compared to a death sentence.

From the beginning of time, women [and men] have been dealing with the problem of infidelity. I’m not saying it’s easy and she should get over it because it’s damned hard. [Been there.] But my sense of it is that this book might be keeping her stuck in her misery and prevent her from moving forward.

By Andrea Brandon on 05/07/2009 10:45 pm