Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Julia Reed | 05/12/2009 9:40 am

Julia Reed Answers the Media Takedown of Elizabeth Edwards

Tina Brown asked, ‘Why did she feed herself to the vultures?’ Julia has the response.
Julia Reed

Elizabeth Edwards’s appearances on "Oprah" last week and on "Today" with Matt Lauer Monday morning continue to inspire questions about her motives. Why is she staying with her husband if she is clearly still angry with him? Why is she airing her dirty laundry – or, in the words of Tina Brown on The Daily Beast, why has she “fed herself to the vultures,” by writing and talking about her husband’s affair?

Regarding the first question, it turns out that she is more like the majority of Americans than we might think – statistics show that most marriages survive infidelity. “A great many relationships are successful at navigating through it and prospering afterward,” says Dr. Brad Sagarin, a professor of social psychology at Northern Illinois University. “Infidelity does not automatically erase the love that was there. Undoubtedly there is a lot of anger, but it doesn’t negate all the positive feelings. It is wise not to make an immediate decision to dump the marriage because often the desire to stay often ends up outweighing the initial angry desire to leave.” 

Not all couples that stick together “prosper,” of course – it takes hard work for that to happen. “Marriages survive infidelity one of two ways,” says Mira Kirshenbaum, a Boston-based couples’ therapist and author of When Good People Have Affairs. “In one case it’s a result of the wronged spouse having nowhere else to go. The marriage survives but the relationship dies. They simply carry on carrying on. In the best case, the relationship goes into intensive care, but comes out of it better than ever.” For that to happen, she says, “the cheated-on spouse must have the capacity to forgive and the cheater must have the sincere desire to earn forgiveness by truly seeing and understanding and feeling the pain he’s caused.”

The cheated-on spouse must also face some hard truths. "In therapy, we let the wronged spouse get angry and rail," says Manhattan-based clinical psychologist Jeff Gardere, who is also a frequent commentator on the "Today Show." "But at one point you have to say, ‘Now let’s look at where you may have had some responsibility, in terms of the choices you made or why you may have decided to look the other way. If you don’t confront that, you will either get into a new relationship that is a carbon copy of the old one, or your spouse is going to go right back out and do it again.’"

I have no idea if  David Vitter, the Louisiana senator who was a client of the DC Madam (and reportedly also a frequent client of a now-shuttered New Orleans house of prostitution), got therapy with or without his wife, but I do remember Wendy Vitter’s gutsy handling of the situation when they made the de rigueur march to the podium. Rather than remaining mute and smiling like so many before her, she took the microphone from her husband and said, “To forgive is not always the easy choice. But it was the right choice for me. David is my best friend.” While there is no accounting for taste, I believed her – and, like the Harts and the Spitzers and, so far, the Edwardses, they are still together.

As for the second question – why would Elizabeth Edwards air this out? – she’s not alone in that either. When former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey announced his “truth,” that he was a “gay American,” Dina McGreevey, his wife and the mother of his child, stood – smiling! – beside him. Then, after the shock wore off, she wrote a book, Silent Partner, detailing her hurt and her anger, and including the tidbit that before she accompanied him to the podium he told her that “you have to be Jackie Kennedy today,” and that she should “smile a little more” during the part when he planned to ask for forgiveness.

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

M J
I’ve thought about Elizabeth’s reasons for writing also. I know she has children who know everything now about what’s gone on with their dad. I have not read the book yet, but I know Elizabeth has her own very strong personality. If it were me, I would want to leave something so my children would not think I was weak or that they should feel their mother was trampled by what their dad did. She may also want their children to know she thinks their dad is a good person even though he make a serious error and has caused great pain to the family. Again, I have not read the book, so I am only speculating about why I would write such a book.
By M J on 05/12/2009 9:54 am
beth willis

Although I do have some sympathy for the participants in these dramas, I’m mostly reminded of a variation of the wearing of another’s shoes:  Do not judge until you walk a mile in your opponent’s shoes.  Then you’ll be a mile away, and you’ll have his shoes.

Peace and grace

By beth willis on 05/12/2009 9:57 am
Sharon Belko
My only comment is that from experience I know there is a vast difference between "forgiving" and "forgetting"!
By Sharon Belko on 05/12/2009 10:14 am
Lucinda Herbert
Julia,I completely agree with you. I was really disgusted by Tina Brown’s mean spirited article when I read it this week.  Elizabeth Edwards has been married for a long time to her husband. I suspect she was stunned when she heard about his infidelity and, given everything else she had and continues to have on her plate, was in no way capable of making hard and fast decisions.  The campaign was already moving forward and she probably wasn’t given the time to think things through privately — without the staff, without her daughter, Kate, and God forbid, the little ones becoming aware of the whole sordid mess.  There was also her health to consider, there was the stability she wanted for the younger children, and there was the need to come to terms with the betrayal.You are absolutely right, Hillary had her own agenda and ambition.  Monica was not the first time she was faced with humiliation — Bill has a history of bad behavior and Hillary actively managed the staff and the bimbo eruptions throughout his campaigns and administrations – because she shared Bill’s ambition.  She road into Washington on his coattails, but she viewed herself as Bill’s partner not helpmate.  When she realized she wouldn’t be received in Washington that way (security clearance denial, health care failure). She decided she’d wait for her turn. That’s not Elizabeth’s MO      I don’t think Elizabeth can be criticized for writing a book and getting on the talk show circuit.  The tabloids have had a field day with her and I think she wants to set the record straight … in her own words … not somebody else’s – for her sake, for her children’s sake.And why she stays … well, why does anybody else stay in a comparable marriage? — as she said, "it’s complicated."  Human relationships are complicated and when they include many years of intertwined lives and children, it is up to the individuals involved to sift through the details and make their own decisions and we should leave it alone. 
By Lucinda Herbert on 05/12/2009 11:04 am
Donna Leal

Elizabeth Edwards has strength of character. I admire her for writing this book.

By Donna Leal on 05/12/2009 11:30 am
Barbara
I don’t understand how writing a tell all book about your husband’s infidelity shows strength of character.  It might be stronger to keep it to yourself and do whatever it takes to live your life with strength and character…whether with or without your spouse.
By Barbara on 05/12/2009 2:32 pm
Burke Omalley
I totally agree with you.  This whole public breast beating by the Edwards is nauseating.  What a pair.  They deserve each other.
By Burke Omalley on 05/13/2009 3:29 pm
Laura Ward

I agree with you. The strength of character comes from writing a book despite the pain it must have caused her. Otherwise, there will be another nasty article where Elizabeth Edwards can never defend herself against once she’s gone. Her children will need that.

By Laura Ward on 05/12/2009 4:18 pm
Ruth Houston
By Ruth Houston on 05/12/2009 11:35 am
James the Game
We need to give Liz Edwards the respect she deserves, and not question why someone in her circumstances would do something seemingly illogical. John Edwards’ actions were despicable. However, hopefully he is working to redeem himself and become a better character.
By James the Game on 05/12/2009 1:23 pm
Willow K
We may never know her true motivations, but my going on a book tour, and doing these public interviews, she has legitimized our gossipy wondering of her motives and decisions.  You can’t have both your privacy and broadcast your take of the situation on national TV.
By Willow K on 05/12/2009 1:52 pm
Lindas Sanders
Elizabeth Edwards is operating from a brain that is crazed with loss: her son, her life, her marriage.  If she were to discover tomorrow that her cancer was gone, I believe that she would shudder at this book, give her truly worthless husband a good stiff kick and move on.  That won’t happen, sadly, so we must all stop vilifying her and offer nothing more than love and support.
By Lindas Sanders on 05/12/2009 4:21 pm
Dianne Lopp
Why can’t people in our society comprehend that it is possible to wish Elizabeth Edwards well and still disagree with her choice to write this book?  We have become a nation of people who cannot understand or tolerate legitimate criticism; in short, a nation of crybabies—-and no, I am not calling Mrs. Edwards a crybaby!  Everyone is not going to agree with her decision for very good reasons.  No one is screaming off with her head!  I am terribly sorry for all the tragedy the Edwards have faced—-and I am sorry for Rielle Hunter’s baby as well.  And I think this book is a mistake.  These views aren’t mutally exclusive, for heaven’s sake.
By Dianne Lopp on 05/12/2009 7:57 pm
Sherry Hubbell

I really like Elizabeth Edwards, but I have no interest in reading her book - although I don’t begrudge her writing it, either.  I would feel like a voyeur somehow, if I read it.

As for staying with her husband?  That’s entirely between the two of them, and she’s obviously made her part of the decision.  I, for one, will not condemn her for it.  No one knows what truly goes on between the two people in a marriage - no one except for the partners involved.

 

By Sherry Hubbell on 05/12/2009 8:10 pm
Carla Lowe
My beef with Elizabeth Edwards is not about her decisions to stay with the cad,  write a book airing her family’s dirty laundry, her non-resilient, emotionally-unhealthy inability to put things in the past and move forward while trying to give advice to others, but with the fact that she lied to the entire country to further her own selfish ambitions to be first lady, jeopardizing the Democrat party, the election, deceiving people into working for or contributing to John’s campaign—and has yet to apologize to us for that. (Her explanation aka excuses for not shutting it all down revealed her own narcissism and denial of reality.) She committed fraud. In my book, what she did was even MORE despicable than what John did, because sadly, we expect caddish behavior from politicians, but Elizabeth was the one we trusted. 
By Carla Lowe on 05/13/2009 6:38 am