Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Julia Reed | 05/12/2009 9:40 am

Julia Reed Answers the Media Takedown of Elizabeth Edwards

Tina Brown asked, ‘Why did she feed herself to the vultures?’ Julia has the response.
Julia Reed

Elizabeth Edwards’s appearances on "Oprah" last week and on "Today" with Matt Lauer Monday morning continue to inspire questions about her motives. Why is she staying with her husband if she is clearly still angry with him? Why is she airing her dirty laundry – or, in the words of Tina Brown on The Daily Beast, why has she “fed herself to the vultures,” by writing and talking about her husband’s affair?

Regarding the first question, it turns out that she is more like the majority of Americans than we might think – statistics show that most marriages survive infidelity. “A great many relationships are successful at navigating through it and prospering afterward,” says Dr. Brad Sagarin, a professor of social psychology at Northern Illinois University. “Infidelity does not automatically erase the love that was there. Undoubtedly there is a lot of anger, but it doesn’t negate all the positive feelings. It is wise not to make an immediate decision to dump the marriage because often the desire to stay often ends up outweighing the initial angry desire to leave.” 

Not all couples that stick together “prosper,” of course – it takes hard work for that to happen. “Marriages survive infidelity one of two ways,” says Mira Kirshenbaum, a Boston-based couples’ therapist and author of When Good People Have Affairs. “In one case it’s a result of the wronged spouse having nowhere else to go. The marriage survives but the relationship dies. They simply carry on carrying on. In the best case, the relationship goes into intensive care, but comes out of it better than ever.” For that to happen, she says, “the cheated-on spouse must have the capacity to forgive and the cheater must have the sincere desire to earn forgiveness by truly seeing and understanding and feeling the pain he’s caused.”

The cheated-on spouse must also face some hard truths. "In therapy, we let the wronged spouse get angry and rail," says Manhattan-based clinical psychologist Jeff Gardere, who is also a frequent commentator on the "Today Show." "But at one point you have to say, ‘Now let’s look at where you may have had some responsibility, in terms of the choices you made or why you may have decided to look the other way. If you don’t confront that, you will either get into a new relationship that is a carbon copy of the old one, or your spouse is going to go right back out and do it again.’"

I have no idea if  David Vitter, the Louisiana senator who was a client of the DC Madam (and reportedly also a frequent client of a now-shuttered New Orleans house of prostitution), got therapy with or without his wife, but I do remember Wendy Vitter’s gutsy handling of the situation when they made the de rigueur march to the podium. Rather than remaining mute and smiling like so many before her, she took the microphone from her husband and said, “To forgive is not always the easy choice. But it was the right choice for me. David is my best friend.” While there is no accounting for taste, I believed her – and, like the Harts and the Spitzers and, so far, the Edwardses, they are still together.

As for the second question – why would Elizabeth Edwards air this out? – she’s not alone in that either. When former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey announced his “truth,” that he was a “gay American,” Dina McGreevey, his wife and the mother of his child, stood – smiling! – beside him. Then, after the shock wore off, she wrote a book, Silent Partner, detailing her hurt and her anger, and including the tidbit that before she accompanied him to the podium he told her that “you have to be Jackie Kennedy today,” and that she should “smile a little more” during the part when he planned to ask for forgiveness.

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mommy Dearest

Julia, dahling, I don’t like a lot of people, but I DO like you.  Straight talk from a woman who can think straight about a subject that was begging for a fresh perspective.

Kudos, my dear.

 

By Mommy Dearest on 05/13/2009 9:50 am
Brigitte Powell

Aw Carla put a sock in it.  People in Glass Houses shouldn’t throw rocks.  She is dealing with it in her way….you don’t have to read it.

By Brigitte Powell on 05/13/2009 4:39 pm
Sally K
In today’s environment, the entire population of the world  has opinions about how the rest of the world’s population  should live.  Everyone knows what people OUGHT to do in certain circumstances, how they OUGHT to feel, what they SHOULD do.  What a lot of crap!  The woman continues to love her husband.  It doesn’t mean she’s got some sort of character flaw that needs to be examined, and it doesn’t, necessarily, mean she needs her head read.  She loves her husband, period.  She feels entitled to try and hang on to  the life that she and he had built prior to this incident.  People make decisions, right or wrong, and unless and until they ask for help or assistance, there isn’t much that the rest of us need to say about it.  Why she wrote the book, again, her decision. She probably wrote it, because she , on some level, gives a rip about what the rest of the world thinks.  She doesn’t appear to be the sort of woman who wants to be regarded as a sap, and is trying to explain why she made the decisions she did.  If I allowed myself to have an opinion on this, I would probably wish she hadn’t.  I’d love to see a political wife issue a statement regarding whether she is  going to leave the guy or stay with him, follow that with a short statement, saying something like ‘my reasons are my own’ ,  and then just turn, walk off the podium and , in effect, tell the rest of us to mind our own darned business. I miss the days when the private lives of politicians were kept there. 
By Sally K on 05/17/2009 10:14 am
Emily W.

I feel sorry for Elizabeth for the betrayal and the subsequent, very public humiliation. I feel sorry for the loss of a child and for her cancer. However, she is no paragon of virtue, as Carla points out (and I fail to see, Brigitte, why Carla should "put a sock in it"). Elizabeth, knowing of his affair, and that it could come to light, campaigned for him as if nothing was wrong. My beef with this, is that John, the millionaire, consistently played Mr. Populist (how many times did you hear "the son of a millworker"?), championing the underdog, the underpaid and the underserved, while at the same time wringing hard-earned dollars out of those very same people for a campaign hiding a terrible deceit. In that, let there be no doubt, Elizabeth was clearly complicit.

No, I would not want to walk in Elizabeth Edwards’ shoes, but her behavior was just as dishonest as John’s was in that respect. 

 

By Emily W. on 06/06/2009 9:42 pm