Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Jackie Kennedy | 07/06/2009 8:45 am

Kennedy Family Shocker! Book Says Jackie, RFK Had Steamy Affair

New book that uses Kennedy confidants, FBI and Secret Service evidence, says soon after JFK’s death, his wife took up with his brother.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
RFK/Jackie Kennedy Images: Wikipedia/Wikipedia

It seems we never get tired of hearing news about America’s closest thing to royalty — the Kennedys. But today there’s scandalous news that could fuel your appetite even more for tidbits of the country’s most iconic family.

The New York Post has an exclusive story today on how a new book claims that Jackie Kennedy had a four-year affair with Bobby Kennedy — John F. Kennedy’s brother — soon after her husband’s assassination, and that "everybody knew about the affair." RFK, who was married and father of 11 kids, was Jackie O.’s "true love," according to the book Bobby and Jackie: A Love Story, written by author C. David Heymann, who spent almost 20 years scouring old FBI and Secret Service files, among other items, for evidence to include in his book. He also quotes people like the late Franklin Roosevelt Jr., who served in JFK’s Cabinet; Arthur Schlesinger; Gore Vidal; Truman Capote; and Morton Downey Jr.

Some of the other scandalous charges: It was Jackie, not RFK’s wife, Ethel, who told doctors to take RFK off life support after he was shot; the pair were seen kissing and touching in Palm Beach during Christmas 1964; a Commerce Department official saw Bobby and Jackie on the couch together, with her straddling him, in July 1966.

Meanwhile, historians and experts are weary of Heymann’s tome, saying that portions of the book are attributed to only a single source and claims are unreliable. One of the book’s disbelievers include Pierre Salinger — Kennedy’s White House Press Secretary — who says the tales are total "bull."

Click here to read more about this explosive story. Do you think it’s true?!

 

56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lin Cercone

OMG:  The Pod People will probably be all over this - like flies on horse sh..t.  JFK died in 1963, do we really need to know this or care?  Unless there is something very graphic, I agree it’ll probably be in the $1. bin within weeks.   

By Lin Cercone on 07/06/2009 12:49 pm
F Fox

I was part of that era…not 105, but…and I must say that I am amazed at the revelations about Jackie. I certainly have not been following the family as I lost interest in it a long time ago, but I did actually think she was classier than that. I read recently that Marlon Brando confessed to a brief affair with her. He certainly had no reason or motivation to lie about such a thing.

That time was much more moralistic  and much more conventionally Judeo Christian than these times. Most people kept their love affairs, if they had them, private. The Kennedys were really larger than life and very emblematic for Americans. Joe Kennedy was maybe the first to politic successfully to break the "ethnic" and religious barrier by having his son elected as the first Irish Catholic US President. It really was a big, groundbreaking event at that time. Their large family, great wealth, daredevil spirit, and succession of incredible tragedies…sudden death, plane crashes, retardation, lobotomies, stillbirths, paralysis, assassinations, murder, drug addiction, brain cancer, and the list goes on…were something approaching Shakespearean, if not as well-written. Their story still is. The Kennedys were our Plantagenets or Tudors. Jackie was an American princess. She was like an American combination of Queen Elizabeth II and Carla Bruni. Who could have possibly guessed that she was more like Carla Bruni than we thought at the time? 

It seemed like anything could have happened in the late 60s. When she was afraid to be in the US, so was I. It was that kind of a time, when things were turning upside down. My life brushed against hers tangentially. I didn’t think a great deal of her personally but I did think she was a good public figure. As for her alleged affair with Bobby, it certainly seems possible. She was a dynastic heiress, sold off to Jack Kennedy because of her background. "Gone With The Wind" also comes to mind. Remember that she had a notoriously philandering father; her last romantic attachment, Maurice Tempelsman, supposedly provided her with a kind of emotional security that she had not had before. It’s true that she was an adulteress; supposedly he could not get a divorce from his wife, but those were the times. Surely if hubris is punished, Jackie got hers swiftly, with fatal brain cancer at a relatively early age, and then her surviving son and his wife dying tragically before any children were born. 

By F Fox on 07/06/2009 1:02 pm
Laura Ward

Truman Capote lost his credibilty when he wrote about his "friends" in a horribly derogatory manner. For instance, that Richard Burton didn’t love Elizabeth Taylor and only used her for stardom (Burton’s diary after death refutes that). That Gloria Vanderbilt was a terrible mother to her two younger sons and that Wyatt Cooper was worried about this (I’m sure Anderson Cooper would refute this, they’re very close and always have been).

The other "sources," Gore Vidal (his mother had previously been married to Jacki’s step-father) and Morton Downey, Jr. seem suspect too.

But again, like some of the comments say, who cares?

By Laura Ward on 07/06/2009 1:25 pm
F Fox

I care the same way I cared about Princess Di, although I am not a Brit. There is something about those larger-than-life figures that speaks to all of us…except some of you ladies on this post, of course.

As to who is being quoted, we have:

 Franklin Roosevelt Jr., JFK’s undersecretary of commerce

 Arthur Schlesinger

 socialite Mary Harrington

 Commerce Department administrator Kenneth McKnight

 Marlon Brando

Of course, these people could be either misquoted, mistaken, or lying, except for Marlon Brando who allegedly was a direct participant. It would be good if  Heimann could produce the evidence on the Brando book.

;

By F Fox on 07/06/2009 2:27 pm
Carol Legarra
I am not surprised.  As far as the book is concerned, it seems that much of the American and European public loves  gossip about celebraties so the book will sell.  And… they were liberal Democrats so it is definately possibly true.
By Carol Legarra on 07/06/2009 4:52 pm
L. C.

Yawn !

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

By L. C. on 07/06/2009 6:35 pm
andrea haber
It wouldn’t surprise me; Ethel supposedly was angry about the time he spent with her. She had her own brood to take care of. Also, RFK gave her a ring that she often wore for the rest of her life. I wouldn’t judge her; I can’t imagine what it would be like to have my husband’s brains in my lap. I do know RFK was a player. When he was campaigning he spoke at a synagogue in New York. My closest friend was married to the rabbi. She was a real beauty. After his speech he cornered her in the rabbi’s study, pushed her against the wall and kissed her. If she were interested I’m sure it would have gone further.
By andrea haber on 07/06/2009 9:25 pm
F Fox

Do you have citations or verifiable quotes from Ethel Kennedy? I was thinking that at least one person knows what happened; that is her. Probably some of her children too.

I am kind of nonplussed at some of the comments of disinterest on this thread. There are over 500 comments on the Sanford debacle, so people clearly think that adultery by public officials is relevant. There is potential political history here that involves some Palestinians; I am sure some of the players are alive today. Possibly still playing. If anyone recalls a few years ago when it was outed that Thomas Jefferson, dead and in his grave for maybe 200 years, had a Black mistress, it was big news.

 There is no contemporary American president’s wife who is or was as extreme as Jackie Kennedy, nor a political family as extreme as the Kennedys. so, their story goes on. 

By F Fox on 07/07/2009 6:05 am
Deena B.
I am kind of nonplussed at some of the comments of disinterest on this thread.

But you mentioned in an earlier post that you no longer follow the family because you have lost interest in it.  Perhaps some of the other posters on this thread feel the same? 

 

By Deena B. on 07/07/2009 7:59 am
F Fox

I lost interest in the family in toto after Bobby died and about the time that Ted was involved in Chappaquiddick. I never lost interest in Jackie, although I didn’t follow everything that she did. Without making too much of it, this family made political history, for better or worse. If I were to look at how presidents actually governed, without paying attention to the fireworks, I would look at others. If I’m looking at dazzle and spin and sheer presentation, the Kennedys lead the group. There is such a tremendous difference between now, when so much is so readily available to people over the Internet, and then, when so much was simply hidden and unrecoverable or really difficult to recover. Maybe these posters do not remember or weren’t around for the Freedom of Information Act. Even with FOIA, the amount of digging that Heymann must have done is immense. I think looking at the "presidential" Kennedys is very instructive, and has lessons that can be applied now.What the Kennedys did in terms of spin has direct bearing on how presidential campaigns are carried on today.

By F Fox on 07/07/2009 9:31 am
Lucinda Herbert
Jackie left instructions that her papers/files were to be sealed until 50 years after her death, and I believe there is a taped in depth interview that she also asked not be released to the public until she’s been dead 50 years —- so we will just have to wait for firsthand details of her life.
By Lucinda Herbert on 07/08/2009 2:27 pm
James the Game
Anything to make a buck, eh?
By James the Game on 07/06/2009 9:26 pm
F Fox

Your point?

Why don’t you just spit it out? 

By F Fox on 07/07/2009 5:46 am
James the Game
F Fox, my point is pretty obvious. This is another attempt by someone to make a buck by digging up nearly half-century-old rumors. Does that spell it out for you?
By James the Game on 07/07/2009 8:49 am
Patricia Sprofera
James - "Anything to make a buck, eh?"  No truer words were written.  Be well.  Patty
By Patricia Sprofera on 07/08/2009 9:09 am