Kirsten Gillibrand | 03/17/2009 9:50 am
Kirsten Gillibrand Picks up Clinton Fight, but Some Dems. Looking to End Her Career

Kirsten Gillibrand, who took over Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat when she moved to the State Department, seems to be picking up where her predecessor left off.
The lawmaker confirmed yesterday that she’ll fight for the Paycheck Fairness Act, a federal measure that would allow female employees to look at their male peers’ paychecks and make sure they’re being equally compensated. It was one of former Sen. Clinton’s main priorities.
Said Gillibrand on the Act, according to WNYC, "It’s such a travesty for our family, because when our families don’t have access to that income that’s deserved, it literally translates to quality of child care, quality of health care, quality of education."
The act goes further than the recently passed Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This new measure would protect employees who want to know their colleague’s salaries and would allow punitive damages, rather than just compensation for dollars withheld.
Gillibrand and Secretary of State Clinton’s universes came together last week, when Clinton allies threw a fundraiser for the new Senator. Even former President Bill Clinton made an appearance. Some estimated the event brought in $250,000. Good thing, too, because some New York Democrats are looking into running Gillibrand out of town come 2010.
Ten lawmakers sent a letter to New York Democratic Party chairwoman June O’Neill and asked her to stay out of their way, "Some of the co-signers of this letter may support Senator Gillibrand. Some are considering running for the seat. Others remain undecided. However, each of us wants a Democrat to win in a process that is fair, open and inclusive." That means, they say, that the party shouldn’t fund Gillibrand in any way, shape or form. Ouch.























2 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Your hypothetical could very easily happen — that’s how Al D’Amato became Senator and remained in office for so long, while Democratic vanity cases duked it out in the primaries, and having failed there, in third-party challenges.
The silly thing about all of this is that so far, Gillibrand has not put one foot wrong as Senator. These folks will have to distort her record in order to justify their challenges to her. Frankly, this is more about spite and disappointment than it is about politics, with the green-eyed Carolyn Sisters sniping at Gillibrand like the "Heathers."
One other thing: Carolyn Maloney — who was apparently the first to sign the letter (perhaps she is the author) urging the party to withhold money from Gillibrand — is a very rich woman. She is one of the wealthiest people in Congress. Perhaps Maloney’s strategy is to tie Gillibrand’s hands, moneywise, by withholding party funds while at the same time dipping into her own deep checkbook.