Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 11/03/2009 4:00 am

Legalize It, by Allegra Huston

What could we do with an extra $2.88 billion of public revenue right now?
By Allegra Huston
Image via Flickr by wallyg

Editor’s Note: Allegra Huston’s new book, Love Child: A Memoir of Family Lost and Found, hit bookstores last spring. Allegra is the youngest daughter of film director John Huston and sister of Oscar-winning actress Anjelica Huston. She was born in London, raised in Ireland and Los Angeles, and now lives in Taos, NM. She was a publisher in London for nine years and has been a freelance writer and editor since 1994.

It’s dark. You’re walking to your car, the subway or just home. You spot a gang of youths out for a night of fun. Your heart races. Then you see what they’re doing: smoking dope. Oh, no! You might trip over one of them. Maybe they’ll philosophize you to death.

Good thing they’re not doing something legal, like drinking, which might get you a broken bottle in the face.

Reefer madness was a fantasy; if everyone took up pot, we’d have a nation of chilled-out people committing way less violent crime.

I’m not such a libertarian that I’m arguing for the legalization of all drugs — I’ve seen what hard drugs can do. But let’s be sensible. Why do we criminalize more than a quarter of the population for enjoying a substance whose primary effects are relaxation, the munchies and an overuse of the word "dude"? I don’t use cannabis, but I also don’t jump out of airplanes, go on ten-day fasts, eat peanut butter or engage in masochistic sex; and as people who enjoy those things aren’t hurting anybody but themselves, I don’t see the point of banning them. In fact, I think we should mandate cannabis use for politicians; then they might actually tell the truth, as Al Capone’s henchman did when the FBI gave him a joint to loosen him up for interrogation.

But it’s a Drug — that dreaded word. OK, what’s a drug? "A substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body."  Too broad. "Something and often an illegal substance that causes addiction, habituation or a marked change in consciousness." That covers coffee, video games and iPhones, not to mention alcohol and tobacco. OK, I’m queen for a day, and I say they’re bad for people. Now they’re illegal. You’ll call them drugs.

Full disclosure: I have tried, twice, to smoke a joint. I couldn’t; my throat burned, it hurt. I tried hash brownies too, but uttering a sentence was like hauling on ropes to put my brain back together. I ate too many. I couldn’t resist: I’m addicted to chocolate.

That’s my point: A drug would be a medicine, or just a vice, or merely an indulgence, if it weren’t illegal. So why is cannabis illegal?

It’s virtually impossible to figure out why some drugs and not others were made illegal in the first place. The history of criminalization is piecemeal and murky. The first ban on cannabis was a specifically anti-Muslim act, propagated by those guardians of all that is right and good, the Spanish Inquisition — who, when they came to the New World, instantly concluded that the hallucinogenic drugs used in native religion must be tools of the devil. It’s hard not to see racism and power politics at work in all this, especially when you look at old propaganda images of black men high on cocaine raping white women, and sinister Chinese luring the flower of white youth into their opium dens. 

142 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

deber B

phyllis, when a country starts out legalizing one drug the rest are sure to follow.   It is a fact that young people who have legal access to drugs abuse it and become addicted to it.   When they become addicted to it they cannot work.   When they cannot work to earn money to buy the drug they turn to crime and prostitution.   Alcohol is a very good example of what can happen to decent people who become addicted to these substances. 

I rest my case.    We all have the statistics in front of us.   Legalize one drug and another one will soon follow because that’s the way it works.    We should all learn from alcohol addiction and not repeat the mistake.

By deber B on 11/03/2009 11:34 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Sorry, deber, but your premise is flawed for two reasons: #1 There is no evidence to support the supposition that legalizing Marijuana would lead to legalizing other drugs. #2 Many young people have/do have access to drugs and alcohol and have not/are not addicted. There have been/are many people that operate while being drug induced. You are referring to those that ARE seriously addicted and go down the slippery slope. There will always be those kinds of addicts whether certain drugs are legal or not. You cannot rest your case on false premises. 
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/03/2009 12:48 pm
deber B
phyllis, from all I have read "The Gateway Drug" leads to other drugs for many young people.   If you can provide me with research that proves me wrong, I’ll understand your position.   However, from what I’ve read making marijuana available to teenagers is a trainwreck.
By deber B on 11/03/2009 1:47 pm
R.J.B. Reed

http://stats.org/stories/2003/research_gateway_jan30_03.htm

 

In short, it’s a question of causation and correlation.  Certainly if you look at people who use cocaine, they are more likely to have smoked pot as teens than if you look at people who do not.  Does this mean pot smoking lead to the cocaine use?  Maybe.  But, it also could be that the sort of person who is willing to use one illegal drug is also willing to use another, and pot just happened to be one of the easiest illicit drugs to get until fairly recently.

In any case, it does not look like it acts as a gateway drug except when it comes to very young users (<=13 years).  Since I don’t think any advocate for the legalization of pot thinks that it should be available to people under 18, this isn’t really a problem.  In fact, the legalization of pot will make it harder for young children to get a hold of because there will be no black market for it any more.  After all, you can’t buy beer on the black market and most stores are pretty good about not selling to teens because they can make so much more of a profit on their legal customers if they are not in jail.  Whereas, someone who is selling pot is already willing to break the law about who they’re selling it to, so it doesn’t much matter if the person is 12 or 40. 

By R.J.B. Reed on 11/03/2009 3:34 pm
deber B
I hear you but I don’t agree with you.   It’s too risky.   The bus driver driving my grandchildren to school could be under the influence.   The daycare giver, the pediatrician, the list goes on.   Legalize it and we will end up like the European countries.   Not good in my opinion.
By deber B on 11/03/2009 3:39 pm
Mary E. Sayler
The drugs of choice at this time among the teenagers in my area are the prescription drugs that their parents and grandparents use for cause.  They think nothing of stealing from their family members to supply their need and leave the legal adults in pain.  Dr. Phil’s program today is stating that drugs for ADHD/ADD is the new gateway drug.  Those are legal drugs.  Have fun with that bit of information.
By Mary E. Sayler on 11/03/2009 6:05 pm
deber B
Mary, good information as usual!  
By deber B on 11/04/2009 5:33 am
Laurel Sayler
Deber Hate to burst your bubble but the majority of teens have already smoked pot, get drunk at parties, and have possibly popped Xanax. Teens can get pot everywhere and its not a big deal to them anymore. The new gateway drugs are actually prescription pills and do more damage to teens than smoking a joint can ever do. I used to know someone who would bug me daily about stealing my mom’s pills to give to him. My mom doesn’t take any prescriptions and since I care about my mom I would never do that to her but I think you get my point. Pot for teens is like adults having a drink to relax after work. Since all you cite is research then I have to assume that you have never had any experience so I suggest that you become truly informed and take a hit off a joint. That might change your attitude and give a craving for brownies not to mention a truly enjoyable nap. People who have never sampled pot need to shut up because you know nothing except what you read. Experience counts for a lot in this case.
By Laurel Sayler on 11/04/2009 3:26 pm
deber B
Laurel, you aren’t capable of bursting my bubble.   I know teens smoke pot.   I know teens get drunk at parties.   Your post truly disappoints me.   Has your mother read it?   Does she approve of you smoking pot?   LOL!
By deber B on 11/04/2009 5:34 pm
STACY SEARS
Phyllis,  I must say that while there are many who are able to use marijuana and other drugs without any problem.  However, to many addicts it is a gateway drug.  I’ve heard this directly from recovering addicts and have witnessed this in my practice.  I fully realize that there are problems with alcohol abuse as well, but at least we have some ground rules here for alcohol use.  Blood levels of alcohol are easily tested, levels of marijuana and other illlicit substances are not as easily to quantify.  Urine drug screens can pick up marijauna days after it is used.  We have laws about alcohol use and driving, but I see no way to fairly penalize someone for driving while stoned and I sure don’t want to be on the road with a bunch of stoners….at least now they usually stay home. 
By STACY SEARS on 11/04/2009 3:45 am
STACY SEARS
Hey Deber, just for grins..what if they did legalize it and make it a prescription item (which I’m totally against having to deal with handing out pot as a part of my job)…if the healthcare bill goes throughl would that mean it would be covered under insurance?  Then, wouldn’t the argument about it bringing down the costs of law inforcement be a wash?
By STACY SEARS on 11/04/2009 3:31 am
deber B
Stacy, interesting!!!
By deber B on 11/04/2009 5:34 am
Tracey Duffy

Marajuana is no more dangerous than alcohol yet it’s illegal, while alcohol is legal.  Cannabis is a medicinal herb that has been used for centuries.  But it took 20th century US gov’t to decide that we, the people, need to be told what is bad for us and what should be illegal. 

Just the other day I was watching a news program and they were talking to a police officer in Amsterdam.  He didn’t agree with what you have stated in your previous post.  He stated that crime rates were low and that the incidence of drug addiction was actually much lower than in the US (much much lower).  

Dont’ state 20 year old studies as truths.  Get up to date facts.  And try to look with open eyes and mind and not through ideology.  Morality is subjective.   Each generation has their own set of morals.  

Government is for protection of it’s people from OUTSIDE countries - not from themselves.  Once the government dictates how it’s subjects should act, personal freedoms, personal responsibility, etc., all go right out the window.

By Tracey Duffy on 11/04/2009 8:26 pm
Sue Fawcett
The issue is legalizing marijuana…not hard drugs. Remember, alcohol is a drug and it’s legal. I think there’s room for legalizing marijuana and enjoying the tax benefits of such a move, not to mention curtailing a vast amount of criminal activity. In regard to healthcare, the U.S. system is failing on a number of levels, and clinging to the existing framework is akin to supporting a sinking ship, metaphorically speaking.
By Sue Fawcett on 11/03/2009 8:03 am
Chris Glass`

I haven’t heard any talk about how legalizing cannabis might affect our daily lives. Do you really want your child driven to school by an impaired bus driver or carpooling mom? How about taking a plane or public transit where the driver wasn’t all there? Let’s not forget the industrial workers who need their wits about them at all times for their safety and that of others. 

There is no way of stopping one sector of the public from being able to partake while barring others. I am not against legalizing for medical purposes under controlled conditions. I am not in favor of adding another layer of impairment on the highways or in situations where our children or the public could be at risk. I might feel different about this if I knew that people would take responsibility for their own actions. I don’t see that happening.

By Chris Glass` on 11/03/2009 8:44 am