Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 11/03/2009 4:00 am

Legalize It, by Allegra Huston

What could we do with an extra $2.88 billion of public revenue right now?
By Allegra Huston
Image via Flickr by wallyg

Editor’s Note: Allegra Huston’s new book, Love Child: A Memoir of Family Lost and Found, hit bookstores last spring. Allegra is the youngest daughter of film director John Huston and sister of Oscar-winning actress Anjelica Huston. She was born in London, raised in Ireland and Los Angeles, and now lives in Taos, NM. She was a publisher in London for nine years and has been a freelance writer and editor since 1994.

It’s dark. You’re walking to your car, the subway or just home. You spot a gang of youths out for a night of fun. Your heart races. Then you see what they’re doing: smoking dope. Oh, no! You might trip over one of them. Maybe they’ll philosophize you to death.

Good thing they’re not doing something legal, like drinking, which might get you a broken bottle in the face.

Reefer madness was a fantasy; if everyone took up pot, we’d have a nation of chilled-out people committing way less violent crime.

I’m not such a libertarian that I’m arguing for the legalization of all drugs — I’ve seen what hard drugs can do. But let’s be sensible. Why do we criminalize more than a quarter of the population for enjoying a substance whose primary effects are relaxation, the munchies and an overuse of the word "dude"? I don’t use cannabis, but I also don’t jump out of airplanes, go on ten-day fasts, eat peanut butter or engage in masochistic sex; and as people who enjoy those things aren’t hurting anybody but themselves, I don’t see the point of banning them. In fact, I think we should mandate cannabis use for politicians; then they might actually tell the truth, as Al Capone’s henchman did when the FBI gave him a joint to loosen him up for interrogation.

But it’s a Drug — that dreaded word. OK, what’s a drug? "A substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body."  Too broad. "Something and often an illegal substance that causes addiction, habituation or a marked change in consciousness." That covers coffee, video games and iPhones, not to mention alcohol and tobacco. OK, I’m queen for a day, and I say they’re bad for people. Now they’re illegal. You’ll call them drugs.

Full disclosure: I have tried, twice, to smoke a joint. I couldn’t; my throat burned, it hurt. I tried hash brownies too, but uttering a sentence was like hauling on ropes to put my brain back together. I ate too many. I couldn’t resist: I’m addicted to chocolate.

That’s my point: A drug would be a medicine, or just a vice, or merely an indulgence, if it weren’t illegal. So why is cannabis illegal?

It’s virtually impossible to figure out why some drugs and not others were made illegal in the first place. The history of criminalization is piecemeal and murky. The first ban on cannabis was a specifically anti-Muslim act, propagated by those guardians of all that is right and good, the Spanish Inquisition — who, when they came to the New World, instantly concluded that the hallucinogenic drugs used in native religion must be tools of the devil. It’s hard not to see racism and power politics at work in all this, especially when you look at old propaganda images of black men high on cocaine raping white women, and sinister Chinese luring the flower of white youth into their opium dens. 

142 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Heidi W
Chris, the same rules should apply with pot as alchohol, if they are caught driving drunk they are punished, then three strikes you are out.  The same should apply with pot although in my opinion it does not impair you like alchohol does.  People still drive drunk, drive on medications etc. regardless.  There will always be someone doing something they shouldn’t.
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 9:00 am
Chris Glass`
Pot does impair people however: those under the influence do not recognize it. The rules for alcohol are not enforced in some areas. A drunk driver killed the child of one of my good friends. He walked away with a slap on the wrist with just a traffic citation. The child was not on the street he was in his own driveway. Industrial workers handle dangerous gases and substances daily. Many are fired or sent home for alcohol abuse but sometimes they make the headlines with their mistakes instead. I stand by my statement that if people policed themselves this would be a non-issue.
By Chris Glass` on 11/03/2009 9:24 am
Heidi W

Hi Chris, I know it does impair but not to the degree that alchohol does, I have seen this in friends and also from personal experience. Have you tried it?  There are many, many people who work at intense jobs who smoke it and you would never know unless they told you.  I have seen this first hand. Cops (believe it or not), Factory workers, Doctors, Real Estate Agents, Government officials, lawyers the list goes on.   I do not think that teens and young adults should be allowed to smoke before the age of 21.  There are not enough studies on how it affects the brain cells of younger people who’s brains are still forming.

 I am sooo very sorry about your friend’s child, that is the most awful way to lose a child, my heart breaks for her.  In my state he would be jailed right away, there are no three strikes if you kill someone here.  I agree with you…If people policed themselves this would be a non issue.  :o)

By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 9:43 am
deber B
Charles Manson…..and his followers….were on drugs when they murdered Sharon Tate and the others.   How many cases have we seen where people were stoned on drugs and they commited horrendous crimes?    Their excuse, "If I hadn’t been high on drugs I never would’ve done that."
By deber B on 11/03/2009 11:37 am
Heidi W
They weren’t high on Pot only, they were taking LSD which is a man made hallucinogen and God knows what else.  No excuse for the crime but we are talking about just pot here…not hard drugs. Not to mention it was a CULT with a lunatic for a leader.   Not your basic pot smoker.  So sorry, this doesn’t fly for a reason to oppose it.  The only reason pot is illegal is because of money, people were afraid to let hemp grow, paper companies and others put a stop to it, they didn’t want to lose money.  It had nothing to do with the drug aspect.  Look it up, might be interesting reading.  :o)  I know there are quite a few documentaries on it, Netflix has at least 4.
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 11:44 am
deber B

Heidi, perhaps that was not a good example of the point I was trying to make so I will agree with you there.   All I know for sure is that there are people who are "responsible" pot smokers….recreational users and then there are  people who abuse ALL drugs.   Just look in our prison systems.   One drug leads to another and our society has to pay for their weaknesses in the end.

I’m sure the Manson group started out smoking just marijuana.  What do you think? 

By deber B on 11/03/2009 11:51 am
Heidi W
I think they would have done anything he asked because face it, they were not all mentally there to begin with.  Usually people with addiction problems have underlying reasons for why they want to make it all go away for a while.  He chose vulnerable people with existing issues.  Whether they drank a beer, took a pill or smoked a joint, they would have done what they did anyway because they were brainwashed.  They thought he was Jesus for Pete’s sake.  I agree there are people who abuse all drugs, but legalizing pot wont change that.  It may even make less attractive BECAUSE it would be legal.  They can’t make any money selling it.
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 11:58 am
deber B
heidi, it’s bad juju all the way around.
By deber B on 11/03/2009 12:19 pm
Baby  Snooks

Cary Grant used LSD. And probably "started out just smoking pot."  I don’t recall him running around Beverly Hills murdering people.  If people are going to use drugs, why not legalize them. At least the drugs they would use would be safer.  Many of the horrible things that happen to people are the result of drugs that have been mixed with other things like rat poison.  Legalizing drugs would also get rid of the problem with gangs as well as the mafia. All sorts of reasons to legalize them. As for your "stasitics" compare the number of people killed by drunk drivers to the number of people murdered by people on drugs.

By Baby Snooks on 11/03/2009 12:23 pm
deber B

Baby Snooks, with all due respect, you actually do not know anything for certain about Cary Grant…however what we do know is that statistics show that those who start off using marijuana end up going to other drugs.

Marijuana is called "The Gateway Drug" as it can lead to other drugs.   

By deber B on 11/03/2009 12:37 pm
Heidi W
Deber, As I said in an earlier post.  Those that will be addicts, will be addicts no matter how they start out  (most of the people I knew who were addicts started drinking, stealing booze from parents fridge and liquor cabinets not smoking pot)   Then you have those who won’t become addicts no matter how much pot they smoke.  Just like some people will not become alchoholics after drinking a few beers.  Marijuana is not physically addictive and you can only get so high, no matter how much you smoke, so the desire to go to something stronger has to do with the person, not the drug they start out on.  :o) 
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 12:47 pm
deber B
Heidi, if you can provide valid research that supports your comments, I would like to read them.   I have read that smoking pots leads to other drug use.   I  haven’t found research that supports legalizing it.
By deber B on 11/03/2009 1:49 pm
Heidi W

Well Deb you must have been looking in the wrong places. lol   Here are a few to get you started, I have plenty more and have spent a lot of time researching this.  :o)  These are reputable sites.

http://www.drugpolicy.org/marijuana/factsmyths/

http://www.gallup.com/poll/123728/U.S.-Support-Legalizing-Marijuana-Reaches-New-High.aspx

http://economics.about.com/od/incometaxestaxcuts/a/legalize_pot.htm

http://www.naihc.org/hemp_information/hemp_facts.html

http://www.changetheclimate.org/facts/

By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 2:54 pm
Heidi W
One more thing regarding the "gateway drug" title.  It is my personal belief as well as many others that if you are predisposed to addiction chances are that much greater that you will become an addict.  This is why you would stay away from things that could make you take the wrong path.  Addiction runs in families and also can be brought on by abuse.  Not sure if it is the genes, the dna whatever but even cough medicine can be called a gateway drug for some.  I believe AA made up the title Gateway drug so that people would not smoke in place of drinking or other drugs.  They want you totally clean.  That’s a good thing.  I don’t belive marijuana can be named as the ONLY gateway drug.  I stay away from alchohol because alcoholism runs in my family. Some people don’t do that and find themselves in trouble.
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 3:17 pm
deber B
Thanks, Heidi, for taking the time to provide these links.   I’ll read through them and get back to you.
By deber B on 11/03/2009 3:18 pm