Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 11/03/2009 4:00 am

Legalize It, by Allegra Huston

What could we do with an extra $2.88 billion of public revenue right now?
By Allegra Huston
Image via Flickr by wallyg

Editor’s Note: Allegra Huston’s new book, Love Child: A Memoir of Family Lost and Found, hit bookstores last spring. Allegra is the youngest daughter of film director John Huston and sister of Oscar-winning actress Anjelica Huston. She was born in London, raised in Ireland and Los Angeles, and now lives in Taos, NM. She was a publisher in London for nine years and has been a freelance writer and editor since 1994.

It’s dark. You’re walking to your car, the subway or just home. You spot a gang of youths out for a night of fun. Your heart races. Then you see what they’re doing: smoking dope. Oh, no! You might trip over one of them. Maybe they’ll philosophize you to death.

Good thing they’re not doing something legal, like drinking, which might get you a broken bottle in the face.

Reefer madness was a fantasy; if everyone took up pot, we’d have a nation of chilled-out people committing way less violent crime.

I’m not such a libertarian that I’m arguing for the legalization of all drugs — I’ve seen what hard drugs can do. But let’s be sensible. Why do we criminalize more than a quarter of the population for enjoying a substance whose primary effects are relaxation, the munchies and an overuse of the word "dude"? I don’t use cannabis, but I also don’t jump out of airplanes, go on ten-day fasts, eat peanut butter or engage in masochistic sex; and as people who enjoy those things aren’t hurting anybody but themselves, I don’t see the point of banning them. In fact, I think we should mandate cannabis use for politicians; then they might actually tell the truth, as Al Capone’s henchman did when the FBI gave him a joint to loosen him up for interrogation.

But it’s a Drug — that dreaded word. OK, what’s a drug? "A substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body."  Too broad. "Something and often an illegal substance that causes addiction, habituation or a marked change in consciousness." That covers coffee, video games and iPhones, not to mention alcohol and tobacco. OK, I’m queen for a day, and I say they’re bad for people. Now they’re illegal. You’ll call them drugs.

Full disclosure: I have tried, twice, to smoke a joint. I couldn’t; my throat burned, it hurt. I tried hash brownies too, but uttering a sentence was like hauling on ropes to put my brain back together. I ate too many. I couldn’t resist: I’m addicted to chocolate.

That’s my point: A drug would be a medicine, or just a vice, or merely an indulgence, if it weren’t illegal. So why is cannabis illegal?

It’s virtually impossible to figure out why some drugs and not others were made illegal in the first place. The history of criminalization is piecemeal and murky. The first ban on cannabis was a specifically anti-Muslim act, propagated by those guardians of all that is right and good, the Spanish Inquisition — who, when they came to the New World, instantly concluded that the hallucinogenic drugs used in native religion must be tools of the devil. It’s hard not to see racism and power politics at work in all this, especially when you look at old propaganda images of black men high on cocaine raping white women, and sinister Chinese luring the flower of white youth into their opium dens. 

142 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Heidi W
Deb, You are quite welcome! Hope it helps in understanding this far out concept, legalizing marijuana dude!  Sorry, lol  Couldn’t resist.  ;o)
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 4:45 pm
Sara Smile
Funny, with the rationale that marijuana use leads to "other drugs" — you’d think all those baby boomers who smoked pot in the 60’s would be drug addicts by now.
By Sara Smile on 11/03/2009 4:14 pm
deber B
Sara, I don’t know how to respond to your comment other than to say that millions of baby boomers did not smoke pot.   It’s a choice.   I never wanted to go there because I thought it was irresponsible and plain stupid.   It’s a choice.   It’s also a fact that we have drug addicts….all colors, ages, gender, etc.   In my opinion, legalizing marijuana is bad juju for our country.  
By deber B on 11/03/2009 4:57 pm
Sara Smile

The point, deber, is that many, many baby boomers used marijuana in the 60’s with no negative effects later in their lives.   Legalizing marijuana does not force anyone to smoke it — you still get your "choice".    As many here have stated, the only thing thak criminalizing marijuana does is make money for the drug cartels and divert our law enforcement resources.  

A lot of things are worse "juju" for our country than marijuana.

By Sara Smile on 11/03/2009 5:19 pm
deber B
Sara, I’m a traditional person, mindset if you will, who never felt a need to engage in chemical stimulation.   However, I do not see a future in America where marijuana will be legalized.   We’ve got lots of conservatives in America.   I’m not sure what could be worse for America than legalizing this euphoric step into la la land other than Obama’s agenda.      I say, "face the music" and find a place in your mind that doesn’t need a drug stimulation to make it better for 15 minutes at a time.   Am I wrong?   From what I have read, marijuana is an escape….from what?
By deber B on 11/03/2009 5:39 pm
Sara Smile

Marijuana never appealed to me, I’m a lot of things — but mellow isn’t one of them and I have no desire to be "mellow".   That said, I don’t see marijuana as any more dangerous than alcohol — and I do like my wine and martinis.  =)    

The point is, marijuana is harmless.   The worse thing about marijuana is that our country currently criminalizes it and spends billions trying to enforce the laws against — meanwhile the drug cartels are making a fortune on it.

 

By Sara Smile on 11/03/2009 6:11 pm
camb 94

I realize that this is unlikely to change your opinion, but I would like you to know that marijuana is not necessarily bad.  I was never a smoker, and I went to a very prestigious east coast college.  Off campus there was a house of young men who were known as the party house.  They were high (on pot) EVERY SINGLE DAY.  That is one reason I laughed at the article’s line of the gang "philosophizing you to death".  The kicker…their house GPA was a 3.97.  No Joke.  I thought that maybe if I started to smoke my grades would go up.  I didn’t, and they didn’t, but all of these guys went on to normal, high paying regular jobs. 
Obviously they were smart.  When they would high they would have deep discussions of philosophy and play "guess where" on a globe and wow each other with factoids about any country that they happened to put their finger on.

I don’t really see how that is worse than a keg party at a fraternity house.

By camb 94 on 11/03/2009 8:27 pm
deber B

Hi, camb 94, thank you for responding to my post.   I understand the point you are trying to make and you are right it won’t change my mind.   It’s the "other" people I worry about….those who can never go to the good universities, make good grades and go on to have successful careers.   The percentage of Americans who make over $250,000.00 a year is small.   Middle America is huge so it is some in that group and the poverty line group that concerns me.   I have researched other countries who have legalized marijuana and it led to abuse and harder drugs for some.   Why take the chance?   It’s my grandchildren I worry about.

Since alcohol is legal instead of lighting up an illegal joint, why not pour a drink?   At least you won’t be arrested for it.

By deber B on 11/04/2009 6:53 am
Heidi W
Hi Cam,  Your post brought back memories of my college days and the differences between the drinkers and the smokers.  The college I attended was probably not as prestigious as the one you went to,  but they have similarities.  The pot smokers would sit and discuss the problems of the world and how to fix them, whereas the drinkers would be slobbering all over themselves and generally having a good time while trying to get as drunk as possible.  All of the pot smokers went on to hold high paying jobs and contribute to society, about 3/4 of the drinkers did the same.  Some people will never change their minds about marijuana because it has been so ingrained in them over the years to see it as evil, dangerous and morally corrupt.  They wont be budged.  Hopefully newer generations will be more informed of the actual pros and cons of the plant and it’s many, many uses.  :o)
By Heidi W on 11/04/2009 8:27 am
STACY SEARS
Sara, the baby boomers that became addicts are generally dead by now.   Many of the baby boomers never used any drug.
By STACY SEARS on 11/04/2009 3:53 am
Sara Smile

Stacy — can’t disagree that boomers who became addicts are generally dead now.   But, the point was — most boomers who smoked marijuana did not become addicts.   There is no correlation between marijuana use and addiction.  

There are plenty of boomers out there who are still alive and are alcholics…….but alchohol is legal.

As we are finding out the hard way — our country has limited resources.   We have to prioritize where we want to spend our money fighting "crime" — currently we are pouring billions down the drain trying to enforce the criminalization of marijuana…..makes no sense whatsoever.

 

By Sara Smile on 11/04/2009 7:47 am
Heidi W
Good points Baby Snooks!!  :o)
By Heidi W on 11/03/2009 12:37 pm
R.J.B. Reed

And how many people have committed murders in the name of their religion?  Obviously if they hadn’t been brainwashed they wouldn’t have done so, so maybe we should ban religion.  After all, it’s known as the opiate of the masses.

 In any case, I fail to see how this is an argument against legalization of pot. Let’s say that what you say is absolutely true, that the drugs they took turned them into murderers.  Not all drugs are equal.  So, one that turns a person into a homicidal maniac doesn’t necessarily mean the others will.  So, we do have to consider the effects of each drug individual.  Secondly, they were getting their drugs illegally anyway.  So apparently the legality of the situation really didn’t come into play.

By R.J.B. Reed on 11/03/2009 3:39 pm
Mary E. Sayler
That wasn’t the Manson Family excuse.  Charlie was out to start a Race War! The murder scene was set up to look like Blacks had killed the Whites.
By Mary E. Sayler on 11/03/2009 6:11 pm
Laurel Sayler
Deber once again your research has failed you. Manson and his followers were on LSD not weed. Try finding a single crime committed by someone who only had weed in his system.
By Laurel Sayler on 11/04/2009 3:35 pm