Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Q & A | 06/03/2009 11:00 pm

'From Struggle to Grace': Arianna Huffington Levels With Lesley Stahl

The co-founder and editor-in-chief of Huffington Post joins Lesley Stahl to talk about Elizabeth Edwards, Obama and the economy, her last incarnation and more.
Arianna Huffington

LESLEY STAHL: Arianna Huffington, thank you. Welcome to wowOwow. You’re the co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post; you’ve written 12 books; you’re a political commentator. One does not know even where to start to ask you questions. But let’s try this. Every time I point my clicker at the television set and surf around, I see Barack Obama. He’s making announcements, he’s giving interviews, he’s there all the time. There’s a debate about why he’s in our faces so much and whether he’s overexposed. What do you think about that? What do you think about the president and is he overdoing it?

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON: I don’t think so, Lesley. I believe that Obama’s strength from the first time he burst onto the national scene with a speech at the convention in 2004, to the last speech he gave this morning …

LESLEY: Yes. Exactly, my point.

ARIANNA: That is one of his great gifts, the ability to communicate, the ability to be not just the commander in chief and the chief executive, but the teacher in chief. He’s a teacher. He’s a natural-born teacher and his speech that kind of most epitomizes that is his speech at Georgetown about the economy, where he literally walked us through what was happening.

I love the current chapter. I love my day job. It’s endlessly evolving, endlessly surprising, and this is it.

LESLEY: If he would do that, and let us absorb it, that’s one thing. But then every day there’s another subject. Today he announced the cyber czar and yesterday it was the cars.  I begin to think maybe it’s a little too much.

ARIANNA: It’s working so far. I think it will stop working if the economy, the real economy as opposed to the stock-market economy, does not improve. If we don’t see any real shift in unemployment numbers, foreclosure numbers, credit-card default numbers, then I think people may begin to feel that they want results, and … and simply talking, which I think is incredibly important. I don’t think we should ever underestimate the power of leadership through rhetoric, through explaining, through spreading confidence – which has been working because, if you look at the numbers of consumer confidence, for example, they’re entirely based on imponderables. The numbers about how you feel about current conditions are not good at all because current conditions are based on data. But the numbers about the future are dramatically better because they’re not based on data. They’re based on hope.

LESLEY: One would have the impression, based on his popularity, that politically he is bringing the country over a little bit to the left, that he’s created a sea change – basically turning the country more bluish. But I saw a recent Pew Poll that said actually we haven’t changed all that much; in terms of liberal versus conservative we’re still pretty much a 50/50 country. What do you make of that? It’s interesting.

ARIANNA: Actually, you know, Lesley, I feel that this left/right way of looking at the world is very obsolete; that if you look at the major problems that we are facing – and let’s take health care, there is … you don’t have to be a progressive or a liberal or on the left to be in favor of some form of universal health coverage. I was just on CNN now and we discussed a poll they just brought out that shows large majorities in favor of government providing health care. Clearly it’s not just liberals or those on the left who want that.

192 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

James the Game
That’s what’s been so discouraging for me: the lack of decent pay in journalism. I mean, $8 or $10 an hour - some wages I’ve received in the 2000’s at different journalism jobs in business print, radio sports, and radio news. Now, I blog on sites like this for nothing (about the same amount, eh?)
By James the Game on 06/04/2009 12:19 am
Judy K.

As you well know, with all the free news on the net, people don’t want to have to pay for information.  So writers, like yourself, want to get the facts out there but are not getting paid.  Seems to me we are turning into a compartmentalized society with people who read and those who get bullet points from the news on TV and that is about it.  Good journalism is becoming a rarity and getting paid for it is getting to be harder and harder with all the newspapers shutting their doors. 

The sad thing is that the news on the net can be verified in a nanosecond these days but good old-fashioned news stories with depth and full explanations might never even be read by more than a handful of people.

By Judy K. on 06/04/2009 9:22 am
James the Game
Yes, Judy. My specialties are breaking news, and investigative reporting. My favorite is sports reporting, and I dug doing airbone traffic. Business news is quite exciting nowadays, too, because you have economies attempting to diversify.
By James the Game on 06/04/2009 10:23 am
Judy K.
James, you sound upbeat about your reporting.  Good for you.  Hope that things improve but glad to read that you are enjoying your vocation.  Hope lots of stories come your way.
By Judy K. on 06/04/2009 12:32 pm
S G
I enjoy reading the huffington post. Arianna is trailblazing for future generations.
By S G on 06/04/2009 7:12 am
Honor Authenticity

Arianna Huffington is a hypocrite. While she claims to be the voice of democracy, and has received a sizeable infusion of cash to keep her website going, she only pays a handful of people.

The economic model for the Huffington Post amounts to cyber-feudalism, and it’s a model that is being repeated all over the place.

Shame on you Arianna.

How can you call yourself a Liberal or a Democrat when you don’t pay your people for their work?

By Honor Authenticity on 06/04/2009 8:00 am
C jay

Honor? Take a look at the site you are writing those words on, now.

 

By C jay on 06/05/2009 12:10 am
Maggie W

Insightful interview and two interesting takes on grace by Arianna.

"  The way I say to myself is to move from struggle to grace.  There’s a lot of effort that goes into any kind of project, right?"     (How true.)

"  …..he’s ( Cheney) doing it in a way that is so bitter and so lacking in grace of following the sort of protocols of how you act when you’ve just left office. I mean, he’s really trying to almost get like a third term."   (How true!) 

By Maggie W on 06/04/2009 8:17 am
S G
MEOW!!!!!!!!!!! How the claws have come out. How ridiculous this is becoming. Arianna is runninga website and I am sure its not cheap. She is now getting advertising. I am sure wowowow has plenty of interns and volunteers  working for nothing to try to get it off the ground. I am quite sure she will be paying people as she can. The web is the future of news and media. It doesn’t happen over night. Discussion has obviously left the building sadly enough.
By S G on 06/04/2009 8:20 am
Honor Authenticity

To the best of my knowledge, while wowowow has interns and volunteers, contributors are paid something for their work.

Not so on Huffington. Virtually no one gets paid and this ‘model’ is becomming the standard on the web.

It’s a sad state of affairs for professional journalists and writers and Arianna H. should know better.

There’s no excuse for an owner or publisher selling ads and not compensating for professional services rendered. 

By Honor Authenticity on 06/04/2009 9:03 am
barrett etc
are there contributors to the HUFFINGTON POST that are complaining about lack of payment?
By barrett etc on 06/04/2009 9:37 am
Joni Evans
Hey, now.  This interview with Arianna Huffington by Lesley Stahl has much more interesting material,  than the old Cheney vs Obama songs, doesn’t it?  As for websites, we all struggle, we are all underpaid and we are all trying to find our way in this new economy.  As for wOw, we do have summer and seniors and virtual "interns" and we pay them back in experience. For some, it is the ability to show published works on a resume. Everyone else here is salaried, but nowhere near what traditional media paid and we’ve needed to cut back since our start up days before the economy shifted.  Some day, when whatever model of new journalism wins out, we’ll all hope to earn what the world decides we are worth.
By Joni Evans on 06/04/2009 9:56 am
James the Game

Yes, Joni, it was a good interview. And it’s also good to see wOw occasionally interact with the readership. Sometimes, it appears that the stars atop the wOw banner are disconnected with those who post, and even between themselves.

Someone raised a good suggestion that, perhaps, the site should have an open queue in which people can blog about whatever they want, and not be limited to responding to just the articles posted by the wOw staff. Readers might want to talk about their kids, the weather, sunblock, picnics, Palestine, whatever, but cannot, because it’s "off-topic".

By James the Game on 06/04/2009 10:36 am
Joni Evans

James:  Very very soon.  We have been working on just these tools and want all communications (on site and

off) to be readily available.  

By Joni Evans on 06/04/2009 11:03 am
J Holmes

Joni,

Thank you for stepping in before this got off subject.  I enjoyed reading the interview.

By J Holmes on 06/04/2009 11:59 am