Q & A | 06/03/2009 11:00 pm
'From Struggle to Grace': Arianna Huffington Levels With Lesley Stahl

ARIANNA: I mean you have a Business Week story that talks about CEOs wanting that, because increasingly corporate America has been carrying a lot of the burden of having to deliver health care to their employees. And we see that on the economy it’s hard to know whether what Obama is doing should be defined as left or right, because he’s basically bailing out Wall Street, and to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, which many conservative economists and many liberal economists – you have Paul Krugman and Niall Ferguson of Harvard – thinking this is not the right way to go.
LESLEY: Let me throw out a couple of names at you and have you give us your read on what you think these people are up to and whether you think they’re succeeding. OK? So let’s start with someone I find five steps beyond intriguing – former Vice President Dick Cheney. Now speak of a transformation, he suddenly went from Mr. Illusive to Mr. Everywhere.
ARIANNA: Well he is, I think on every level, failing because I think he’s making policies that the president repudiated, and the nation repudiated by electing Obama, even more … even less appealing because he’s out there defending torture without any data, without any evidence. He keeps saying that these policies worked, even while CIA analysts, people who’ve actually delved into the data and the effectiveness of torture are denying what the former vice president is saying, and he’s doing it in a way that is so bitter and so lacking in grace of following the sort of protocols of how you act when you’ve just left office. I mean, he’s really trying to almost get like a third term.
| I love the current chapter. I love my day job. It’s endlessly evolving, endlessly surprising, and this is it. |
LESLEY: And you think it’s not succeeding?
ARIANNA: I think the people who are buying what he’s saying are the same kind of 20 percent that’s going to approve of the administration right to the bitter end.
LESLEY: OK, let me ask you about someone else. Sonia Sotomayor. What’s your take in general about her? And what does your gut tell you about her stand on abortion?
ARIANNA: Well, first of all, I really feel that she is immensely qualified for the job, and I find the attacks on her as being a racist, as Gingrich called her, or Rush Limbaugh’s endless attacks on her, of being really off the mark and unfortunate for the sake of the Republican Party, because, after all, the Hispanic demographic is so incredibly significant. C-Span explained, as you know, a very decisive role in the last election – 67 percent going for Obama, 31 percent for McCain. So to now see Conservatives attacking her because of her ethnicity, in many instances, is very self-destructive for a party that wants to play a majority role again.
LESLEY: So politically, for Obama this was a brilliant choice is what you’re saying?
ARIANNA: Well, I’m saying that on her merits she is an unassailable choice. And you … I mean, everybody knows she’s going to be confirmed.
LESLEY: Right. So why attack her, right?
ARIANNA: So the way she’s being attacked now is basically undermining Conservatives. And that’s why you have Republican senators and members of Congress disassociating themselves from those attacks. And I just feel it does not make any sense at all. As for her views on abortion, I think we will know more when she comes up for confirmation.
LESLEY: Do you think that the liberals should mount a campaign against her if it isn’t clear that she’s pro-choice?
























192 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
As you well know, with all the free news on the net, people don’t want to have to pay for information. So writers, like yourself, want to get the facts out there but are not getting paid. Seems to me we are turning into a compartmentalized society with people who read and those who get bullet points from the news on TV and that is about it. Good journalism is becoming a rarity and getting paid for it is getting to be harder and harder with all the newspapers shutting their doors.
The sad thing is that the news on the net can be verified in a nanosecond these days but good old-fashioned news stories with depth and full explanations might never even be read by more than a handful of people.
Arianna Huffington is a hypocrite. While she claims to be the voice of democracy, and has received a sizeable infusion of cash to keep her website going, she only pays a handful of people.
The economic model for the Huffington Post amounts to cyber-feudalism, and it’s a model that is being repeated all over the place.
Shame on you Arianna.
How can you call yourself a Liberal or a Democrat when you don’t pay your people for their work?
Honor? Take a look at the site you are writing those words on, now.
Insightful interview and two interesting takes on grace by Arianna.
" The way I say to myself is to move from struggle to grace. There’s a lot of effort that goes into any kind of project, right?" (How true.)
" …..he’s ( Cheney) doing it in a way that is so bitter and so lacking in grace of following the sort of protocols of how you act when you’ve just left office. I mean, he’s really trying to almost get like a third term." (How true!)
To the best of my knowledge, while wowowow has interns and volunteers, contributors are paid something for their work.
Not so on Huffington. Virtually no one gets paid and this ‘model’ is becomming the standard on the web.
It’s a sad state of affairs for professional journalists and writers and Arianna H. should know better.
There’s no excuse for an owner or publisher selling ads and not compensating for professional services rendered.
Yes, Joni, it was a good interview. And it’s also good to see wOw occasionally interact with the readership. Sometimes, it appears that the stars atop the wOw banner are disconnected with those who post, and even between themselves.
Someone raised a good suggestion that, perhaps, the site should have an open queue in which people can blog about whatever they want, and not be limited to responding to just the articles posted by the wOw staff. Readers might want to talk about their kids, the weather, sunblock, picnics, Palestine, whatever, but cannot, because it’s "off-topic".
James: Very very soon. We have been working on just these tools and want all communications (on site and
off) to be readily available.
Joni,
Thank you for stepping in before this got off subject. I enjoyed reading the interview.