Q & A | 06/03/2009 11:00 pm
'From Struggle to Grace': Arianna Huffington Levels With Lesley Stahl

ARIANNA: No. I don’t think so. There’s no evidence that she would have any intention to overthrow Roe vs. Wade. I think there’s a little paranoia here.
LESLEY: Let me ask you about one more person, Elizabeth Edwards. My friends are still sitting around talking about why she wrote this book. Now some think it’s just purely revenge against her husband. But I heard someone the other day – and I found this very curious – say, "Look, if you have cancer you don’t need to explain your motives."
ARIANNA: Well I understand that if you … we all know we’re going to die and in her case, though, you know she has advanced cancer. And as she said on one of the interviews, it came back on her side. So she’s constantly facing her own mortality. So if she wanted to write a book where she put forward how she saw what happened, what the impact was on her and on her family, and if she felt that was something that she wanted to have on the record, I feel that it’s really her choice.
LESLEY: Who are we to question someone in her position?
ARIANNA: Exactly. Yes.
LESLEY: Right. Let’s talk about you. What a great idea.
ARIANNA: I was just so happy we were not talking about me. I was thinking, "I like this interview."
| I love the current chapter. I love my day job. It’s endlessly evolving, endlessly surprising, and this is it. |
LESLEY: Well, let’s talk about you briefly, and then we’re going to talk about the Huffington Post. How’s that?
ARIANNA: OK.
LESLEY: You like talking about that. But I read something that’s somewhat amusing, by Michael Kinsley, who once said of you, "She’s had at least nine lives. Someone’s going to turn it into an opera. Probably her," which is pretty cute. But you have had many lives and —
ARIANNA: And I’ve known you through many of them.
LESLEY: Yes. But … well, I didn’t know you when you were the head of the Debating Society at Cambridge.
ARIANNA: No.
LESLEY: No. I don’t even think I really did know you when you were a Conservative commentator. And now you’re a Liberal commentator. You’ve been a self-help writer, you ran for governor of California. Now you’re a media mogul and a digital pioneer. That’s a lot of lives. And I wonder what you think the thread is that ties your career together. Do you see it as a straight line yourself?
ARIANNA: Um, the thread, if you look at my books, too – you know I’ve done 12 books now – is that I’ve delved into what I’m passionate about. That’s why, in a sense, if you look at my books they range from biographies to, as you said, a self-help book on fearlessness, the political books. So I think it’s really throwing myself into whatever I really want to explore. And in the course of exploring it and delivering something, I also learn. When we launched the Huffington Post four years ago, I just knew that what was happening online was incredibly important and that I wanted – as you also decided to do when you launched wOw – that something very important was happening online and yet a lot of interesting voices were still not online because of habits. And so that is really the original motivation, but I learned so much in the course of launching the Huffington Post and the evolution of the Post. And the same way with a book. You know, I start with an idea and then by the end of it I, myself, have been exposed to a whole new subject.
























192 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
As you well know, with all the free news on the net, people don’t want to have to pay for information. So writers, like yourself, want to get the facts out there but are not getting paid. Seems to me we are turning into a compartmentalized society with people who read and those who get bullet points from the news on TV and that is about it. Good journalism is becoming a rarity and getting paid for it is getting to be harder and harder with all the newspapers shutting their doors.
The sad thing is that the news on the net can be verified in a nanosecond these days but good old-fashioned news stories with depth and full explanations might never even be read by more than a handful of people.
Arianna Huffington is a hypocrite. While she claims to be the voice of democracy, and has received a sizeable infusion of cash to keep her website going, she only pays a handful of people.
The economic model for the Huffington Post amounts to cyber-feudalism, and it’s a model that is being repeated all over the place.
Shame on you Arianna.
How can you call yourself a Liberal or a Democrat when you don’t pay your people for their work?
Honor? Take a look at the site you are writing those words on, now.
Insightful interview and two interesting takes on grace by Arianna.
" The way I say to myself is to move from struggle to grace. There’s a lot of effort that goes into any kind of project, right?" (How true.)
" …..he’s ( Cheney) doing it in a way that is so bitter and so lacking in grace of following the sort of protocols of how you act when you’ve just left office. I mean, he’s really trying to almost get like a third term." (How true!)
To the best of my knowledge, while wowowow has interns and volunteers, contributors are paid something for their work.
Not so on Huffington. Virtually no one gets paid and this ‘model’ is becomming the standard on the web.
It’s a sad state of affairs for professional journalists and writers and Arianna H. should know better.
There’s no excuse for an owner or publisher selling ads and not compensating for professional services rendered.
Yes, Joni, it was a good interview. And it’s also good to see wOw occasionally interact with the readership. Sometimes, it appears that the stars atop the wOw banner are disconnected with those who post, and even between themselves.
Someone raised a good suggestion that, perhaps, the site should have an open queue in which people can blog about whatever they want, and not be limited to responding to just the articles posted by the wOw staff. Readers might want to talk about their kids, the weather, sunblock, picnics, Palestine, whatever, but cannot, because it’s "off-topic".
James: Very very soon. We have been working on just these tools and want all communications (on site and
off) to be readily available.
Joni,
Thank you for stepping in before this got off subject. I enjoyed reading the interview.