Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Q & A | 06/03/2009 11:00 pm

'From Struggle to Grace': Arianna Huffington Levels With Lesley Stahl

The co-founder and editor-in-chief of Huffington Post joins Lesley Stahl to talk about Elizabeth Edwards, Obama and the economy, her last incarnation and more.
Arianna Huffington

LESLEY STAHL: Arianna Huffington, thank you. Welcome to wowOwow. You’re the co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post; you’ve written 12 books; you’re a political commentator. One does not know even where to start to ask you questions. But let’s try this. Every time I point my clicker at the television set and surf around, I see Barack Obama. He’s making announcements, he’s giving interviews, he’s there all the time. There’s a debate about why he’s in our faces so much and whether he’s overexposed. What do you think about that? What do you think about the president and is he overdoing it?

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON: I don’t think so, Lesley. I believe that Obama’s strength from the first time he burst onto the national scene with a speech at the convention in 2004, to the last speech he gave this morning …

LESLEY: Yes. Exactly, my point.

ARIANNA: That is one of his great gifts, the ability to communicate, the ability to be not just the commander in chief and the chief executive, but the teacher in chief. He’s a teacher. He’s a natural-born teacher and his speech that kind of most epitomizes that is his speech at Georgetown about the economy, where he literally walked us through what was happening.

I love the current chapter. I love my day job. It’s endlessly evolving, endlessly surprising, and this is it.

LESLEY: If he would do that, and let us absorb it, that’s one thing. But then every day there’s another subject. Today he announced the cyber czar and yesterday it was the cars.  I begin to think maybe it’s a little too much.

ARIANNA: It’s working so far. I think it will stop working if the economy, the real economy as opposed to the stock-market economy, does not improve. If we don’t see any real shift in unemployment numbers, foreclosure numbers, credit-card default numbers, then I think people may begin to feel that they want results, and … and simply talking, which I think is incredibly important. I don’t think we should ever underestimate the power of leadership through rhetoric, through explaining, through spreading confidence – which has been working because, if you look at the numbers of consumer confidence, for example, they’re entirely based on imponderables. The numbers about how you feel about current conditions are not good at all because current conditions are based on data. But the numbers about the future are dramatically better because they’re not based on data. They’re based on hope.

LESLEY: One would have the impression, based on his popularity, that politically he is bringing the country over a little bit to the left, that he’s created a sea change – basically turning the country more bluish. But I saw a recent Pew Poll that said actually we haven’t changed all that much; in terms of liberal versus conservative we’re still pretty much a 50/50 country. What do you make of that? It’s interesting.

ARIANNA: Actually, you know, Lesley, I feel that this left/right way of looking at the world is very obsolete; that if you look at the major problems that we are facing – and let’s take health care, there is … you don’t have to be a progressive or a liberal or on the left to be in favor of some form of universal health coverage. I was just on CNN now and we discussed a poll they just brought out that shows large majorities in favor of government providing health care. Clearly it’s not just liberals or those on the left who want that.

192 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Libra Lady
Correction…is the
By Libra Lady on 06/04/2009 1:36 pm
mitzi morris

I believe Lesley meant "Elusive" when she referred to Cheney? Or, perhaps "Illlusive" which was used has a special meaning?

This was a good article, but Arianna pays nothing for talent and this is troubling. Huffington Post is interesting, and not always without bias, but I appreciate reading contributors most of the time. I generally log on every day.

 

By mitzi morris on 06/04/2009 3:01 pm
C jay

Believe me, Mitzi, many of us have turned her down. No one should be enticed to work for no pay. Period.

In fact, that is why I refuse to wear anything with a logo on it, or knowingly give my 2cents away for profit - someone else’s.

By C jay on 06/05/2009 12:27 am
Kelly In Texas

Perhaps "elusive" as in Pelosi’s slipping poll numbers. 34%..which are now below those of Cheney….37%.

By Kelly In Texas on 06/05/2009 2:48 pm
Queenie .
If Pelosi is the botox queen, then Huff is the vice-queen.  I remember Arianna on tv years ago, and she didn’t look like she looks not.
By Queenie . on 06/04/2009 3:42 pm
DeBúrca obj
Why is it that you women ALWAYS resort to insulting the physical appearance of Democratic women? Pelosi, Michelle Obama, Arianna Huffington…? I’d expect it from Jim Henley/Alex… you know the 15 yr old boy who used to come in here, but adult women? Stunning.
By DeBúrca obj on 06/04/2009 4:29 pm
Maggie W
Thanks, De, for bringing that up.  This picture of Arianna is very pretty.  She certainly doesn’t look like she could have teenage daughters.  By the same token, Michelle Obama is also a striking woman. Nancy Pelosi is always well groomed.  These  women charted their own courses at one time and followed through, and it wasn’t always easy.   For that, they should be admired, not ridiculed.    You mention 15 year old Alex.  When there is an open forum, as many here want, we can all expect much more of that.
By Maggie W on 06/04/2009 4:48 pm
Deborah Kramer
Maggie-That was just unbelievable!  Who gives a crap if one is pretty or not attractive.  This sounds like high school crap!  Who gives a crap and what difference does it make if she looks or does not look like she has teenage daughters???  OMG!  I do not believe that this could be a part of a conversation and for you to imply that it is of any importance at all is just ludicrous!  This has just set women back about 60 years! They should be admired because they have plastic surgery or because they dress nice, what is the matter with people??  It is what is on the INSIDE THAT COUNTS-THE INSIDE!!!  Very Pretty- who cares, I ask one more time-Who in the heck cares and why would that be important???
By Deborah Kramer on 06/04/2009 5:40 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Deborah, Deborah–––calm down. Go back and read Queenie’s comment––Pelosi, the botox queen, Huff––the vice queen and implying she also had a lot of work and then Deb and Maggie’s response. The two latter posters were just defending these two women and complimenting Michelle in the mix. I understand your anger and I certainly agree with the over-emphasis on physical appearances, but you are screaming at the wrong people here. And to answer your last question: Obviously a great many people.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 06/04/2009 5:53 pm
Deborah Kramer
Phyllis- Sorry, I really did not mean to come across like that.  But I read it again and I know that I did.  It does make me crazy and you are right, I needed to calm down.  I just would love for women to be known for their brains and not clothes and looks, especially when it is not even their own look!  Just kidding around.  It is sad though, that so many peopl do care and I guess I will personally never understand that.  Thanks for your post, it was very kind of you.
By Deborah Kramer on 06/04/2009 6:08 pm
C jay
Deborah, it’s easy to do that. I "answered" the wrong person last week, and felt like I’d fallen on my face - well, I did. ;-))
By C jay on 06/05/2009 12:30 am
Maggie W

Whew!  Phyllis, thank you so much for the clarification.  So much anger here, when all I wanted to say is that we should not dwell on a woman’s appearance when we celebrate their accomplishments and successes.  And I stand by my statement.  Perhaps Arianna has had " work" done ; so what?  She looks very attractive in her picture, and I applaud her " go for it" spirit.

Your voice of reason is much appreciated.  Thank you again.

By Maggie W on 06/04/2009 6:29 pm
Deborah Kramer
Maggie- Just wanted to apologize because I posted to the wrong person and besides that it just is not important anyway.  I feel badly that I was frustrated and I am sure it came across as angry to you.  Please know, I was not angry at you in the first place even if you would have been the one who had originally posted the cosmetic topic, I just become so frustrated because so often things are acceptable on one side and not on the other.  But regardless, I owe you an apology and I am very sorry, you seem to be so kind and really could have gone off on me and you chose not to do that.  Thank you and once again I am very sorry and did not mean anything personally towards you.  Have a good weekend.
By Deborah Kramer on 06/05/2009 2:55 pm
Maggie W
Thank you, Deborah, for such a heart felt apology.  I, too, understand how frustrations can move us in any given direction.  I have been there many times.  I wish you a good weekend as well. Please plan a special treat just for you and you only … to reward yourself for your kindness and good will toward others.  God Bless.  
By Maggie W on 06/05/2009 4:50 pm
Deborah Kramer
Maggie, This will be the last time I will bother you, but I just wanted to say, "Your Welcome" and you are so precious, and very much appreciated by someone who does not even know you.  I will really work on trying not to be in that terrible place again.  Kindness and understanding teaches us so much, thank you for that.  You must be a Teacher!!!
By Deborah Kramer on 06/05/2009 6:09 pm