Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Margo Howard | 09/08/2009 4:00 am

Margo Howard: Move Over, Levi Strauss

Margo Howard

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.

I probably shouldn’t be talking about dish when we have Liz Smith as one of our homeys, but I can’t help myself. The “essay” (well, OK, the running off at the mouth) by Levi Johnston in Vanity Fair had no real surprises for me, but perhaps some other people will be, if not surprised, then disappointed. (Helllloooo, Walter.)

I do believe Johnston was in a position to know whereof he spoke. Plus I think he’s too dumb to make things up. Intentionally or not, he made the Palins sound like the Beverly Hillbillies with snow in their yard.

Even the way they chose names for their children was, let us say, unusual. Bristol and Levi’s baby, Tripp, was given the middle names of “Easton Mitchell” – the “Easton” being Levi’s “favorite hockey equipment company.” (Look, there could be an endorsement deal down the road, who knows?) And Sarah and Todd’s newest baby, Trig, has as his middle names “Paxson Van”; the “Paxson” being Todd’s favorite place to snow machine and the “Van” preceding Palin is to honor Van Halen. Get it, Van Palin?

As who wouldn’t, Levi says Sarah loved the designer clothes, the hair and makeup people and room service. After all of this McCain-Palin whoop-de-do happened, being governor really seemed like a lot of work. It must have been quite stressful because Levi said Sarah would come home sometimes at noon and watch home decorating and wedding shows. (In her Walmart pajamas, which she had in every color.)

Then there is the perception of Sure Shot Sarah. Levi says she didn’t know much about guns. (There was a new one in a box under her bed that she didn’t understand too well, so she asked Levi what was up with that.) Forget all the moose carrying on, this makes shooting wolves from an airplane suspect, at best, but might redeem her with the PETA people.

Governor and Mr. Palin did not share a bedroom, we are told. Because sometimes when Todd was spending the night in his recliner in the living room,  Levi was on the sofa, so he was able to vouch for the fact that Todd did not snore, thereby eliminating that from the possible reasons he did not share a bedroom with the governor. Levi muses that, given the sleeping arrangements, it was surprising to him that Sarah even got pregnant.

Gracefully saying he’s sure his almost-mother-in-law was joking, he relates that she would come home, see Trig and Tripp together and say, “I don’t want the retarded baby, I want the other one.” He also reports  there was quite a bit of fighting and a lot of talk about divorce. It would not surprise me if, now, since Vanity Fair has hit the street, there might even be talk of homicide.

488 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

deber B
I guess we just don’t find it as fascinating as some do.   After all, it was "her" body and "her" baby and the outcome was  a normal delivery.  
By deber B on 09/09/2009 10:41 am
Sandy B
It was also an example of "her" appalling judgment.  I guess this baby is only fascinating when talking about how noble she was to keep it. (actually, I do respect her for that- unless she actually was trying to lose it at the end).
By Sandy B on 09/09/2009 12:04 pm
Mel Berg
Or was it? Maybe there is truth to the rumors that keep floating in Alaska.
By Mel Berg on 09/09/2009 4:40 pm
Lym BO

I’m not trying to beat a dead horse here since we agree on the main point, but to clarify, infection becomes more likely once one’s water has broke due to the womb now being open to the world. That is why we deliver as soon as possible. The airplane part would make no difference other than the change in altitude might hurry along the labor. Once the water (cushion of sorts)  has broke there is more pressure on the cervix.  Add the pressure of the change in altitude & trouble brews. For some women, the expediency of delivery really increases after the water breaks, some not so much. Again more variables that are NOT predictable. Her travel time had to be at least 12 hours, which is absurd & completely unsafe. I would venture to guess that this maverick went against her doctor’s advice & then once she was safely delivered coerced her to say it was okey dokey.  Now if there was exams between flights by someone worthy & someone willing and able to deliver in flight-with oxygen apparatus & suction for baby my medical opinion might not be so dire. I do not have that information. 

Deliveries do not become more speedy with subsequent children. They can but it is not an "obstetrical fact".   There are lots of variables that effect delivery-most of which are not predictable. The child may come more or less speedy than a prior. Women who are prone to very fast deliveries tend to keep with that pattern, but not always. Also depends on many variables. 

At any rate, the issue at hand was the behavior of Palin & that was moronic!  Lucky for the baby it turned out okay. 

I won’t speak to the "retarded" comments since it is hearsay, but I do not like the way she seemed to capitalized on Down Syndrome. There is a time & place to be proactive in education & support of Down Syndrome babies/families. During the campaign is not it. Also to proclaim she had this baby  simply b/c she is pro-life  (not b/c she loved this baby regardless of his health) also didn’t sit well with me.  A parent of a challenged child has to be prepared & ready for it (if it is known). This may be bad press or bad publicity, but what I recall from one of her speeches was I felt like she did it against her will, but solely because of her religious convictions. If the retarded comment was true it solidifies my unease. 

By Lym BO on 09/09/2009 2:28 pm
Rita@ Goldivas
It was mentioned by the Republicans (at the convention)as a sign of her toughness.
By Rita@ Goldivas on 09/08/2009 9:49 pm
Jodi Hendon
As someone who lives in the Dallas area, I can tell you there are a dozen or more hospitals she could have gone to.  We have some fine neo-natal units and birthing centers.  My doctor wouldn’t even let me fly in the 6 weeks before my son was born, not even an hour flight across Texas.  If a Democrat had done the same thing as SP, the Republicans would have crucified her for putting her child’s life in danger.
By Jodi Hendon on 09/09/2009 1:56 am
Rita@ Goldivas
Absolutely, Jodi.
By Rita@ Goldivas on 09/09/2009 9:29 am
Rossana Black
Sandy, I had not heard about that until today.  Did some surfing online and found out that she was 8 months pregnant when she went to Texas for a conference where she was to give a speech.  While there, her water broke.  She stayed at the conference for several hours, gave the speech, then got on a 4 hour flight to Seattle, then another 3 hour flight to Alaska.  Then rode in a car another 40 miles or so to get to a hospital.  Her son was born about 6 hours later.  But we all know babies come at their own time and she could have gone into labor any time during those two flights.  I find that the most disturbing of any of the things I have heard about her.  And she wasn’t a first time mom.  Was she trying to lose the baby?  What a horrible thought, but I can’t come up with any other reasons for her to do something so blatantly irresponsible.
By Rossana Black on 09/09/2009 9:46 am
Sandy B
I suppose it could simply be an example of an apalling lack of judgement.  It was one of the first things I remember about her during the campaign….I couldn’t believe it at first.  It’s still hard to believe- except that it is what happened.
By Sandy B on 09/09/2009 12:09 pm
Rain in Minneapolis
OMG - Van Palin!?!
By Rain in Minneapolis on 09/08/2009 4:23 pm
Leigh Hart

Margo,

Your article is as petty and immature as Levi’s interview. America is full of people who name their children for places, celebrities, musicians, or other things that mean something. Many a family has named their kids with names beginning with the same letter. Many families make it a point to pick unusual names for their kids. What’s your problem with the Palins doing it?

Who really cares what Levi has to say? He’s out for himself trying to parlay the fact that he participated in unprotected sex with a governor’s daughter while she ran for VP into some sort of career in the public eye. He’s a young, uneducated teenager who doesn’t have anything going for him unless he gossips about the Palins. Because that is completely self-serving there is no way to determine if any of it’s true is there?

Get over Sarah Palin already. We have.

By Leigh Hart on 09/08/2009 4:36 pm
Cecile Tunstead

apparently you haven’t or you wouldn’t have posted this

By Cecile Tunstead on 09/08/2009 4:55 pm
deber B
Leigh, good post!   Tabloid mentalities abound!   Gossipmongers!  No way can prove if it is true or not.   LOL!!
By deber B on 09/08/2009 5:14 pm
Elizabeth Newman
I’m all for naming your kids what you want, but I think in this spirit, that some people forget that cute little baby, with that name YOU found so cute, has to live with that name till they die (or can afford to have it legally changed).  Honestly, if you want to give something a cutesy/unique/weird name, buy a pet and name it that. At least a dog doesn’t have to worry about getting beat up on the playground because you saddled it with an unfortunate name.
By Elizabeth Newman on 09/09/2009 8:30 am
Jaime Meier
Dawn-It is a baby WITH Down Syndrome NOT a "Down Syndrome baby".  The baby has Down Syndrome.  Down Syndrome is not what the baby is.  Sorry.  That just bugs me.
By Jaime Meier on 09/08/2009 5:34 pm