Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Margo Howard | 09/08/2009 4:00 am

Margo Howard: Move Over, Levi Strauss

Margo Howard

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.

I probably shouldn’t be talking about dish when we have Liz Smith as one of our homeys, but I can’t help myself. The “essay” (well, OK, the running off at the mouth) by Levi Johnston in Vanity Fair had no real surprises for me, but perhaps some other people will be, if not surprised, then disappointed. (Helllloooo, Walter.)

I do believe Johnston was in a position to know whereof he spoke. Plus I think he’s too dumb to make things up. Intentionally or not, he made the Palins sound like the Beverly Hillbillies with snow in their yard.

Even the way they chose names for their children was, let us say, unusual. Bristol and Levi’s baby, Tripp, was given the middle names of “Easton Mitchell” – the “Easton” being Levi’s “favorite hockey equipment company.” (Look, there could be an endorsement deal down the road, who knows?) And Sarah and Todd’s newest baby, Trig, has as his middle names “Paxson Van”; the “Paxson” being Todd’s favorite place to snow machine and the “Van” preceding Palin is to honor Van Halen. Get it, Van Palin?

As who wouldn’t, Levi says Sarah loved the designer clothes, the hair and makeup people and room service. After all of this McCain-Palin whoop-de-do happened, being governor really seemed like a lot of work. It must have been quite stressful because Levi said Sarah would come home sometimes at noon and watch home decorating and wedding shows. (In her Walmart pajamas, which she had in every color.)

Then there is the perception of Sure Shot Sarah. Levi says she didn’t know much about guns. (There was a new one in a box under her bed that she didn’t understand too well, so she asked Levi what was up with that.) Forget all the moose carrying on, this makes shooting wolves from an airplane suspect, at best, but might redeem her with the PETA people.

Governor and Mr. Palin did not share a bedroom, we are told. Because sometimes when Todd was spending the night in his recliner in the living room,  Levi was on the sofa, so he was able to vouch for the fact that Todd did not snore, thereby eliminating that from the possible reasons he did not share a bedroom with the governor. Levi muses that, given the sleeping arrangements, it was surprising to him that Sarah even got pregnant.

Gracefully saying he’s sure his almost-mother-in-law was joking, he relates that she would come home, see Trig and Tripp together and say, “I don’t want the retarded baby, I want the other one.” He also reports  there was quite a bit of fighting and a lot of talk about divorce. It would not surprise me if, now, since Vanity Fair has hit the street, there might even be talk of homicide.

488 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lym BO

No offense to the people of Alaska, but I think pretty much any one of us could have successfully ran for Governor when she did. Had we the desire. 

I would only run if I could be a dictator. Not a mean one, but a fair one. No free rides. My best patient ever was a quadriplegic who had been a nurse.  This woman, in her 50s, and 9 years out from the accident was working full time. She held a telephonic review job & would literally (& painfully slowly)  peck on the keys on her tiny laptop affixed to her motorized wheelchair. She couldn’t groom herself, she couldn’t dress herself, feed herself with utensils, she pretty much couldn’t do anything except talk & move her arm enough to peck that computer.   She held a job.  She put so many folks to shame.  She was an inspiration. Sorry off on a tangent again…

 

By Lym BO on 09/09/2009 9:38 pm
Dana Pulley
Margo, I’ll grant you that, after all every state has had its fair share of dumb governors. While I’ve not bit of use for her, I feel Palin must have a modicum of intelligence somewhere. Yet she continously lets her ego shut it all down. 
By Dana Pulley on 09/09/2009 11:01 pm
Karleen S
When a person doesn’t even possess a general fund of knowledge that would include some publications to even LIE about and say she’s read, they are not in the least bit intelligent.  That’s one of many things about which I found her astoundingly ignorant.
By Karleen S on 09/09/2009 8:58 pm
Rachel F
Oh please…you’ve never had a mind freeze under pressure? Please, come off your high horse and stop being so condescending and snide…it’s not very complimentary, and certainly not very ladylike…
By Rachel F on 09/09/2009 9:56 pm
Margo Howard
Even a "mind freeze" under pressure, with a kleig light in my eyes, awaken in the middle of the night I would know how to answer, "What do you read?" There are no high horses here, just the facts, m’am. It is admirable to stick up for people you admire, but unfortunate when you do not succeed — for them and for you.
By Margo Howard on 09/09/2009 10:06 pm
Rachel F

Margo, I’m well aware that Sarah Palin will never measure up in your eyes. Apparently you (and many like you) find some sort of self-validation in tearing her to pieces. Ok, whatever floats your boat. Obviously, in your eyes, anything she does will always be done for the direst or stupidest of motives, and anything negative anyone says about her will always be worthy of note. If that’s what makes you happy, well, so be it.

I, however, have been in situations where, under intense pressure, I’ve been unable to recount the most basic things, like my phone number, because I’ve been so focussed on the situation. It really makes no sense to assume that she didn’t answer because she didn’t read — or was unfamiliar with at least the titles of — different (or any) newspapers. Even by the common liberal estimate of her, and even if she did not actually read any newspapers, she would realize that naming at least a few titles would be necessary at that point. That is why I think she had a mind freeze…because she didn’t name her local paper, she didn’t name "New York Times", she didn’t name anything. A school kid could come up with that kind of list. Only someone determined to see Palin in the absolute worst light imaginable couldn’t figure out that Sarah Palin has heard of newspapers and newspaper titles in her 40-something years in this world (including while getting her degree in journalism), and, whether she’s read a page of them or not, could list a couple of titles in normal circumstances. The facts, ma’am, are that Sarah Palin was green, and not a polished politician; she was extremely agitated and overstressed, wanted to pull out of the interview (and was denied by the campaign), and had been over-coached and over-coached and over-coached. None of these factors are likely to help a public appearance, much less all of them. (Oh, and there’s a great deal of difference between a casual interview, and one that is going to shape people’s opinions of you and thereby directly impact your and your running mate’s chances at office).

It might fit the image of "tundra trash" that you like to hold onto, for whatever reason, to imagine Sarah Palin as being so isolated and backward that she’s never even heard of a newspaper title before, but it’s absurd to think that someone who studied journalism couldn’t come away with at least "The New York Times" as an answer to that question in normal circumstances. I’m surprised that you, Margo, of all people, with your insight and years of dealing with people and their complexities, can’t see past the politics to see a human being (rather than a politician) here.

By Rachel F on 09/10/2009 7:52 am
Margo Howard
Rachel — just to speak to your first point: I, and the others who don’t think much of Palin, did not arrive at this judgment for reasons of self-validation. I will just speak for myself here. It does nothing for my image of myself to find fault with her. I am not a politician and she has no impact on what goes on in my life. Zip. Nada. In fact, I was somewhat taken with her in the very beginning. She was great looking, sassy, and her Minneapolis speech was terrific — in delivery, if not in content. Then as the country "got to know her," she was diminished bit by bit. The cracks started to show and it was clear she was just a girl who got lucky because the McCain handlers thought she would be useful. (He didn’t want her. He was told he was taking her. More of that "playing to the base" crap.) The cynical gesture of picking this woman has redounded to no one’s credit - certainly not hers. She was in way over her head, and in the end was shown to be a not very thoughtful or articulate woman. She has been a terrible stumble for Republicans, and interestingly enough, if the choice had been Kay Bailey Hutchison or another Republican worthy, things MIGHT be different today. Gov. Palin was the sacrificial lamb, and I think her shelf-life will be limited. And here’s a prediction: I think the bright lights/big city will go to her head, she will divorce, and five years from now she might regret not having the innate good sense to have told the R. Party: Thanks, guys. This is a great compliment, but I am neither ready nor qualified.
By Margo Howard on 09/10/2009 9:44 am
Rain in Minneapolis
Margo, I couldn’t agree with you more.
By Rain in Minneapolis on 09/10/2009 10:42 am
Annie H
I totally agree with you.  At first, I was taken with her.  Then it seemed the more she talked, I went hmmm, what?  This takes further consideration.  Btw, I do not vote by party, I vote for who I think will do the best job.  I found it rather telling that when McCain conceeded he did not let her speak.  Hopefully, Levi will take the money he milks out of the situation and does something responsible with it.  For example, college money for his child and himself!
By Annie H on 09/10/2009 11:24 am
Margo Howard
Don’t know if you missed this, but she had asked to speak and they said no. Wonder why …..
By Margo Howard on 09/10/2009 11:28 am
Annie H

I knew she had asked to speak but I think the shine had wore off the new penny!

By Annie H on 09/10/2009 12:24 pm
Dana Pulley
Bang on, Margo. In between Palin, SC governor Sanford, and SC Rep Joe Wilson, the Republicans are getting a pretty black eye right now. Makes me feel ashamed for them. 
By Dana Pulley on 09/10/2009 2:27 pm
Cecile Tunstead
The facts, ma’am, are that Sarah Palin was green, and not a polished politician; she was extremely agitated and overstressed, - Then why the hell was she running for vice-president.  Given John McCain’s age, and the likelyhood that she would finish his term, someone who is green and so easily agitated and overstressed should never have even been in a position where she could possibly be a heartbeat away from the presidency. 
By Cecile Tunstead on 09/10/2009 9:47 am
Rachel F
Cecile, the context of that comment was her being green in presenting herself on a national stage in the public eye. Governing and presentation are two different things.
By Rachel F on 09/10/2009 10:57 am
Karleen S

That’s sort of how I looked at it.  I figured neither presidential candidate had a great chance of surviving their term, so I looked at the VP candidates.  Wasn’t impress in that department, either, but after hearing Palin speak a few times knowing she COULD have impact on my life, there was no way I was giving that kind of power to her.  The evident failure of her own policies in her family taught her nothing, and she wouldn’t listen to people trying to help her (that was coming out even before the election).  Then there was the debate where she said she wasn’t going to do it the way it was planned.  What makes her think rules don’t apply to her and how will that translate to how she leads a country?  Besides that, I also can’t stand people who cannot coherently articulate a thought.  I don’t think she ever completed a sentence that she wasn’t reading.  Like Margo said, I could respect her more and have given her future consideration if she said she wasn’t ready.  Now, she’s just a nobody clinging to her 15 minutes as desperately as Levi.  He may have been only an almost-in-law, but he’s a kindred soul.

By Karleen S on 09/10/2009 6:25 pm