Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 05/07/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: Elizabeth Edwards 'Made Her Own Big Ethical Mistake'

Liz Smith

Who knows if Elizabeth Edwards made a mistake sticking with that bum? That’s entirely up to her.

Where she made her own big ethical mistake is to allow him to go on running for the presidency after he’d revealed his "affair" to her. She was enabling him to prevail while lying, cheating and being a potential scandal for American voters who believed in him. And her current book is a disgrace. I feel sorry for her heartbreak and her illness, but not to the extent that (1) she enabled him to go on being a public fraud in trying for the highest office in the land, and (2) she blames the "other woman" for enticing him into the affair as if he had no willpower and no responsibility for his own actions. 

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

O E
I agree with you again, Liz.  I find it hard to feel sympathy for political wives who "stand by their man" regardless of how reprehensible his behavior may be.  These are grown men who  don’t want to control their urges and these are the women who enable them.  Is it for the power, because they’re dependent on the men, because they have low self-esteem, or for the children?  Who knows.  We may never know. Still, I can’t feel sorry for these women at all, particularly when they cash in on the tell all books.  Some way to live.  That 28,000 square foot house of the Edwards may be fancy, with its own basketball court and all, but someone has paid a high price for it and not in dollars, and it wasn’t him. I’m sorry Elizabeth Edwards has terminal cancer.  Maybe she just didn’t want to face the ordeal alone.  But, please, why get on TV and air such embarrassing going ons with the husband in public?  Thank God he didn’t get to be president.  This nation doesn’t need any more of that.
By O E on 05/08/2009 1:16 am
Andrea Brandon
I think I’m going to hurl if I read one more Elizabeth Edwards piece.
By Andrea Brandon on 05/08/2009 3:25 am
Lucy Puniwai
I would not want to live in her shoes. God bless her for what she has endured and what she will face in the future. She will need our prayers and support. Amen
By Lucy Puniwai on 05/08/2009 7:06 am
nanchan u

I agree with you, Liz.

This whole media hype surrounding the book, the trips to Oprah… can we stop it already?

She needs to focus on her kids and her health.  John Edwards always reminded me of a plastic Ken Doll… can we lock him in the Dream House with Barbie and have it be over with?  (or better yet, put him in a shoe box in the basement)

By nanchan u on 05/08/2009 7:47 am
Carole Del Monte
I agree you, nanchan u (best suggestions yet, as well).
By Carole Del Monte on 05/10/2009 6:54 am
Lin Cercone
Lets not judge Elizabeth, obviously denial would be her first response. I believe there’s no such thing as a faithful man.  Given the right woman under the right circumstances:  they’d all cheat.  I personnally believe in the Dolly Parton school of thought, "I’d change that rooster into a hen". 
By Lin Cercone on 05/08/2009 7:48 am
Andrea Brandon
Touche!
By Andrea Brandon on 05/09/2009 1:34 am
Sue Fawcett
I don’t feel as vitriolic towards Elizabeth as Liz, although I agree about the fallacy in blaming the other woman as enticing John into the relationship. It’s the old sexist story of the man not being held responsible for his actions, of being manipulated into something by an "evil" woman. Ridiculous. I think Elizabeth was put into an untenable position by being told about the affair only 2 days into his campaign, in regard to ending it.
By Sue Fawcett on 05/08/2009 9:12 am
Lucinda Herbert

Sue,

I agree with you.  She was only told about the affair after the campaign had been kicked off. She has had to endure so much already what with her health and the fact that she has two very young children.  She is right to resent the "other woman" and to believe that women should have more respect for each other, but she did say that she was not going to allow the other woman to impact her life. And she most certainly does not excuse her husband.  Liz,  yesterday on Oprah she said that she held him responsible for doing this to her and to their marriage.

By Lucinda Herbert on 05/08/2009 9:26 am
Beth Cornell
Here Here, Lin! I just loved that of what you said.
By Beth Cornell on 05/08/2009 11:14 am
Carol Gardner
I believe Elizabeth Edwards is thinking of what is best for her children, because for better, or for worse, John Edwards will always be their father.  From their appearances on the Oprah Show, I believe that he is a total narcissist, who believes he can do no wrong; and I believe that Elizabeth is still in denial, still angry, but still does not want to give up on the louse!
By Carol Gardner on 05/08/2009 2:38 pm
Pat Ackley
I have to believe Elizabeth has "just had it".  She has suffered the tragic loss of a child, knows she will eventually die from cancer, gave up her own ambitions for her husband’s, and now she has suffered the harshest betrayal of all, an unfaithful husband.  I can understand how angry she could feel and how she might in some small way want someone to feel just a little of the pain she is feeling.  Some might call it vengeance or retaliation.  Now, she is being criticized by other women.  Being told she should be a good girl and keep this all to herself.  Be nice.  If she had been a better wife, John would not have been tempted to wander into the "other" woman’s arms.  What a load of crap!  As for me, I will support Elizabeth and try to empathize with her pain of betrayal.  She has earned my respect.
By Pat Ackley on 05/08/2009 6:49 pm
DeBúrca obj
I’m with you 100% Liz. Mrs. Edwards appears to be blaming the woman so that she doesn’t have to blame him, AND, I keep going back to the thought of what if he had won the Primary? The affair would have come out and he would have been responsible for losing the election for the Democrats. And when Elizabeth Edwards agreed to campaign with him she became as much responsible for that outcome as he was. Also, I don’t understand why she allowed him to put her children in this horrible predicament. If he hadn’t run, this story wouldn’t have come out, or if it did, it would have been a blip. 
By DeBúrca obj on 05/08/2009 9:04 pm
Mary Utrup
Elizabeth Edwards was in a total state of shock after John told her he’d had the affair. Then he moves on the announce his candidicy. Was she supposed to get in front of the cameras and denounce him publicly when she barely knew what had happened to her/them? I think she is trying hard to save a marriage that is in total disrepair and she is doing it for the sake of their kids. John Edwards can’t do enough for that girl to make up for his own lack of backbone and utter stupidity
By Mary Utrup on 05/08/2009 9:55 pm
Lin Cercone
It’s really so sad, women are still blaming other women.  Remember all the terrible things said about Hillary for staying with Bill.  Remember that Monica’s name became a verb.  "STOP the insanity"  John Edwards cheated, lied and here we are again,  90% blame the "other woman" the rest blame the wife.  Lets blame the pathetic little prick who couldn’t keep it in his pants.  Remember the old joke, Why do men have names for their peters?  Because they don’t want to leave all the major decisions of their lives up to a stranger. 
By Lin Cercone on 05/09/2009 6:57 am