Exactly, knowing as we all do that teenagers most likely will not listen to their parents, even parents with the strongest fo values and good intentions, knowing all that, shouldn’t we then reexamine the idea of teaching sex eduacation and promoting the use of a condom.  As Kelly From Texas likes to always throw out there, condoms are cheap, buy it use it.  Now if Mrs. Palin supported the idea of teaching sex ed then I don’t the story of her Bristol being pregnant right at her debut to the nation on the biggest stage there was would have been that big of a story.  It could have easily been treated the way most Palin supporters are now spinning the story, Bristol is a teenager and teenagers don’t always listen to their parents.  But no, Mrs. Palin does not support such a thing and is an advocate of abstanance.  Well, abstanance does not always work, proof positive; in her own home.  And no one ever faulted her for supporting her daughter, we are all glad that she did support her daughter.  But she obviously did not learn much from the situation.  I would have admired her more if she did learn from it and come out with a different stance on the situation.  I will never question her ability to be a good parent.  Wel I take that back, I was not kool with her taking her youngest with her on every campaign stops.  I thought the child should of or could have been better off going and attending school and not on the campaign trail.  I never understood that.  I understand wanting your child with you, but on the grand stage that she was on, and the grind of the campaign trail and the various scrutiny that she was under, wouldn’t it have been bettter to keep the child at home?  I mean Mrs. Palin had a vast number of family support at home, why not leave the child with her parents and out of the public view?  I know many Palin supporters are disgusted that the media did such an attack on her family, but why did she have to parade the child on every single stop?  I can only take from that that it was a political move, and if and I strongly emphacise the word IF, that was her intent, can she really in hind sight blame the media for digging into the world that she pushed in front of their face? 

She is a very sexy person, easy on the eye, and she too was a great deliverer of a well written speech.  It was when she went off the script did we really see her true abilities to handle or not handle various situations.  I have to admit when she first came on the stage and gave that great speech, I too was certain that the GOP was going to win.  The camera loved her and she loved the camera.  But you have to ask yourself, why did the people involved with the campaign, now throwing her under the bus.  McCain did not even mention her as a presidential contender for 2012.

Mary:  They can still support her in every way, regardless of her good or bad decisions. 

The Palins have excellent family values, Bristol Palin included.  She had her baby, she’s not on welfare or drugs or diddling around with the next guy.  Her family is supportive, and the baby is part of the family.  That is what a family is about.  It’s too bad the left has so taken over and destroyed the Democratic Party because they once proudly believed in family values.  The Dems I know would never throw a teenage daughter out in the street because she had a child out of wedlock.  I sincerely hope the rational Democrats soon retake control of their party, because this is a mess.