Margo Howard | 07/05/2009 7:15 am
Margo Howard, Ann Coulter Miraculously Agree: Palin Too Big for Alaska
Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the
family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as
Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature
provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.
To slightly skew an e-mail that was going around a few weeks ago, let me just say that friends said the day I agreed with Ann Coulter pigs would fly. Well, swine flu … and I now find myself in agreement with Coulter. [Click here for Coulter’s post.] Sarah Palin is too big for Alaska. And you know why? She signed a book deal – reportedly for somewhere between $7,000,000 and $11,000,000. In April. I do not know how I missed this news, but I did. Maybe you did, too. In any case, no one is particularly tying this news to her resignation. I mean, wouldn’t you rather earn X millions of dollars than $175,000? The haste with which she made her announcement, however, does nothing to disabuse me of the idea that she and the Mr. might be in some legal trouble.
I think quitting for a big-bucks book deal shows a real lack of character, but a great deal of opportunism. The citizens of Alaska elected her to a term of office and she is skipping out because … well, she is too big for Alaska. People who are lame ducks seldom deal with their duckhood by resigning, so let’s scratch that one.
I do disagree with Coulter (my usual stance) on one point she makes in her post. She writes, "I thought her press conference explained it very clearly – though she couldn’t put it precisely this way without sounding vain, but it’s obvious." She "explained it clearly"? That, my dear, is a stretch. If she had explained it clearly the news outlets and the blogosphere would not be talking about how it could barely qualify as English.
Should you want to read a hilarious entry from Jim Washburn’s blog, here’s the beginning, and the link:
To slightly skew an e-mail that was going around a few weeks ago, let me just say that friends said the day I agreed with Ann Coulter pigs would fly. Well, swine flu … and I now find myself in agreement with Coulter. [Click here for Coulter’s post.] Sarah Palin is too big for Alaska. And you know why? She signed a book deal – reportedly for somewhere between $7,000,000 and $11,000,000. In April. I do not know how I missed this news, but I did. Maybe you did, too. In any case, no one is particularly tying this news to her resignation. I mean, wouldn’t you rather earn X millions of dollars than $175,000? The haste with which she made her announcement, however, does nothing to disabuse me of the idea that she and the Mr. might be in some legal trouble.
I think quitting for a big-bucks book deal shows a real lack of character, but a great deal of opportunism. The citizens of Alaska elected her to a term of office and she is skipping out because … well, she is too big for Alaska. People who are lame ducks seldom deal with their duckhood by resigning, so let’s scratch that one.
I do disagree with Coulter (my usual stance) on one point she makes in her post. She writes, "I thought her press conference explained it very clearly – though she couldn’t put it precisely this way without sounding vain, but it’s obvious." She "explained it clearly"? That, my dear, is a stretch. If she had explained it clearly the news outlets and the blogosphere would not be talking about how it could barely qualify as English.
Should you want to read a hilarious entry from Jim Washburn’s blog, here’s the beginning, and the link:
‘Let’s go quit!’ That was CNN’s Candy Crowley Friday night, imagining the decision process that led to Sarah Palin’s resignation, so spontaneous and unplanned did it seem. Nutty, too. It sounded like Richard Nixon if, heading into his Checkers Speech, he’d first taken the edge off by mixing Benzedrex inhalers into his rum and Cokes, the ones Dick Tuck had laced with pure Sandoz LSD, and then Nixon had gone on camera and wrestled an imaginary bear that turned into a black Satan and he’s going to keep that precious baby, no matter what anybody says, even the NBA coaches. That kind of nutty.Click here for the rest of Jim’s blog.
Read more about: Alaska, Ann Coulter, Books, Jim Washburn, Margo Howard, News, Politics, Sarah Palin

























648 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Hi Marjorie — Palin is "genuine," — but SHE is the one trying to be something she is not, running to be VP or (God help us!) POTUS! Really, she has no business aspiring to that office just because alot of followers think she is a "plain speaker," etc. Her story is not a variation of "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington," or any of the other American myths of the political idealist from the sticks who heads to the "Belt-way" with nothing but his/her ideals & some hard-tac in a sack! She is a conniver, a calculating, opportunist white trash — NOT Thomas Jefferson in Andrew Jackson buckskin. Sorry, I know you like her.
Oh Sandbee…stop it…she may not be everyones ideal of the perfect beauty, but she is not ugly. She is attractive so, you saying that she is not, is silly.
It is a fact and saying she isn’t won’t make it so.
Alrighty then Patty…whatever you say…
kelly, you and i have had our vast political differences hashed out numerous times on these threads, but this is about the perception of attractiveness.
everyone has their own ideas on what is pretty - i know that in accordance with american social cues, sarah palin is considered by most to be a pretty female thanks to her makeup, well-done hair, clothing, relatively fit body, her face…
i am a bisexual woman, and frankly i don’t find her to be attractive to me at all. not my type. i can acknowledge that she shows an example of what most people would find pretty, but that doesn’t mean everyone has to find her attractive.
the people i find attractive are strong, masculine females (classically "femme" women don’t really do it for me), or those who express themselves regardless of what boundaries they may be breaking. Dita Von Teese, Chyna the wrestler, Marilyn Manson, Angelina Jolie, Margaret Cho… these are beautiful people to me.
Sarah Palin is plain and vanilla to me if we are talking just about looks. she looks like a soccer mom… she wouldn’t ever turn my head.
You know Amanda…I agree with you on that one…It is just a ridiculous statement to say that she isn’t at all attractive. Ugly is pretty easy to spot…
She wouldn’t turn my head either…but she is still an attractiver person. I happen to think that Elle McPhearson is a beauty…but that’s just my opinion.
I am beginning to wonder at what level your reading skills are: When you wrote, "She is attractive so, you saying that she is not, is silly." You were responding to this post: "But still— I don’t think everyone who disagrees with her politics is jealous of her beauty." In fact. Sanbee agreed she was attractive. Of all the irrational and hostile posters, I think you are the best. You are going to give Republicans a bad name, my dear. Now I await a response from you not unlike another one of yours: that what i wrote is like what comes out of the back end of a horse. Classy - and thoughtful, and articulate. Have a great day.