Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Margo Howard | 07/14/2009 11:00 pm

Margo Howard: Whither America, Whither the World?

Our dearest Margo recently got an earful about the future of the American ‘empire’ … and shares what she learned with wOw.
Margo Howard

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.

There is much talk, in intellectual circles and out, about whither America; whither the world? Where are we headed? What path are we on? It is impossible to know, of course, but I had a most interesting conversation (first by phone, then e-mail) with a longtime friend who works in a sensitive part of the government. He doesn’t know more than we do (well, actually he probably does!) but he has thought about this question to a greater degree than most people, I would guess. He is professionally concerned with war, and wishes not to be named. I share with you his hypothesis, extrapolating to the best of my ability what he said, because it makes a great deal of sense.

This chap believes that our world is headed back to a medieval-like period … not something that will happen next week or next year, but more a trend for the century. He points to the fact that there was Rome. There was the British empire. History will record the twentieth century as that of the USA. The previous empires did not last, and he believes the American "empire" will not, either.

The reasons it cannot last, he believes, are as simple as the laws of physics. The generally accepted numbers at the turn of the last century were that America had 5% of the world’s population and used 25% of the world’s energy. Numbers like that simply are not sustainable, in terms of relative energy usage or production in a growing world.

Technology is also a great leveler. In the midst of the twentieth century much of America’s great technology was homegrown. Not all, but much. We kept producing great ideas, but production was transferred elsewhere. Now the cost of production has dropped and many more people can afford top-end technology. An advanced cellular smart phone has more computing power than was used to build the first nuclear bomb or the Apollo spaceships that took men to the moon – 40 years ago this month.

As technology spreads, so does the fundamental level of education. That does not mean tribesmen in the middle of Africa or the Amazon are necessarily becoming fluent in Java programming, but many more people in the first and second world are. Whether or not America’s great educational system is crumbling, others are definitely gaining.

The Cold War was a containment war. It will be a long time before any other single country can lead a coalition in such global containment again. A war against religious extremists cannot be fought that way, and as the world becomes more interconnected there is also a problem with American foreign policy. To understand this problem, all you have to do is understand the game of football (which he does and I do not) as played by Americans, as contrasted with the way it is played by non-Americans.

Ask any American, he said, about the game of football and he or she will tell you it is played by selected large men wearing massive amounts of padding. It is a violent game with many arcane rules. Everyone agrees on when a play starts and it keeps going until the progress of the ball grinds to a halt. Both sides then agree to return to their respective sides, figure out what to do, come together and then all start again at a specific point. Furthermore, there are many referees on the field and at the pro level there’s the use of instant replay so everyone can agree on what happened. There is also a single clock. Everyone sees the clock, everyone understands the rules about the clock and everyone agrees the game is over when the one big game clock everyone sees finally gets to zero.

254 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Amanda C

then explain it!

By Amanda C on 07/21/2009 2:21 pm
Amanda C

oh, so you think the federal reserve is simply another private entity as well?

hmm. well, birds of a feather…

By Amanda C on 07/18/2009 12:47 pm
Amanda C

sorry idiot, i’m not the one who said the federal reserve was a private entity.

take a quick look at a dollar bill… and try not to blush.

right at the top there…. "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE".

hmmm. strange!

By Amanda C on 07/18/2009 12:46 pm
Kelly In Texas
Amanda…it is not that simple…but Nacy Drew may be impressed with your "investigating techniques". You have no idea what or who the Federal Reserve is. NONE.
By Kelly In Texas on 07/18/2009 2:45 pm
Amanda C

http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm

quote:

"The Federal Reserve System, often referred to as the Federal Reserve or simply "the Fed," is the central bank of the United States. It was created by Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system."

The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.

As the nation’s central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government."

 it’s not nancy drew at all, it’s simply paying attention in highschool, and checking with reliable sources for your information.

now, as i we were saying:

my information was obtained from the federal reserve, in my previous comment i have cited my sources. 

only 1 out of the top 25 private corporations that lent subprime mortgages were regulated by the CRA - the others were de-regulated, and because of the lack of checks and balances, brokers that were not subjected to regulation originated most of the subprime loans that are causing the housing crisis.

By Amanda C on 07/18/2009 7:54 pm
Rantn Raven
I know, what’s next?  Government running our educations, deciding what and when our children should learn?  The next thing you know the government will begin policing our public activities, and making rules as to what is and is not legal.  We will have some government bureaucrat judge us, and decide on punishments of deeds deemed illegal.  We will have to pay taxes toward fixing the streets in other districts, many of which we have never even driven on.  The horror!
By Rantn Raven on 07/16/2009 11:11 am
Margo Howard
B — you made me laugh. What you are calling "spam" is actually a poster who doesn’t like anything I say, and I’m pretty sure doesn’t like me … just on general principle. I am within an ace of suggesting that she avoid reading me, which would do away with her writing about what I’ve said.  
By Margo Howard on 07/15/2009 9:41 am
Lisa M

Interestingly enough, the post about the spam was deleted. Unfortunate that some things are censored, but others are not.  Margo, I have seen KIT post advice in your twice-weekly columns. That, too, surprises me.

Regarding this article, I read with interest your thoughts on this. I think people are taking the term "medieval" out of context. I don’t think you were suggesting that the US would be thrust back into the stone age - we simply have too much technology available to us.  The only way that could conceivably happen would be for us to be completely annihlated. I pray that never happens, despite what fundamentalists might preach. 

By Lisa M on 07/15/2009 10:20 am
Margo Howard
Of course you are right about some people misunderstanding "medieval." This does not mean we are on our way back to fighting with rocks and using chamber pots. It refers, naturally, to a model of decentralization and regionalism, as opposed to globalism.
By Margo Howard on 07/15/2009 11:29 am
mary lou s
don’t ignore the chamber pots idea. for flush toilets we need BOTH water and sewage systems—both of which require taxes to build and maintain.
By mary lou s on 07/16/2009 5:10 pm
Andrea Brandon

Lisa:  "Unfortunate that some things are censored, but others are not."

Indeed, very interesting.

By Andrea Brandon on 07/15/2009 10:00 pm
Lin Cercone

OH MARGO:

Its the same old, same old.  I too don’t understand WHY "they" bother reading your post.  They just don’t "get it".  Trying to have intelligent discourse with them is "an exercise in futility".  No matter what you say, or anyone who agrees with you - they just attack.  But of course if you go back at them - you’re wrong.  I’m so tired of the long, long, long posts of Fox News rhetoric.  They take an opinion and post it as fact.  Waste of time.  I LOVE your site.

By Lin Cercone on 07/15/2009 10:46 am
newzie snoozie

MARGO AND LIN - HEY GIRLS JUST  FEEL SORRY FOR THE UNEDUCATED ONES.

MARGO THE WAY YOU WROTE THAT - WAS SO FULL OF  AN EDUCATED  LADIES WAY OF TALKING AND I MISS IT SO MUCH. TELL THE LITTLE IMPS TO PUSH POFF AND AS THEY FLING THEMSELVES OUT TO WHERE ALL OF THEW ROLD CAN SEE THEM ——MAYBE THEY WILL KEEP ON FLYINGDO NOT CHANGE THE WAY YOU TYPE IT OUT TO US.   I WANT  NO PART OF THEIR  POOR PITYFUL MINDS.

By newzie snoozie on 07/15/2009 6:12 pm
macwoof woof

Margo, Lin, and others ,   totally agree about the same old, same old: boring, tiresome and petty and too many dead beaten horses rotting away. However it is refreshing to see there are those looking to solve the problems and move forward. Margo, I enjoy your columns, and appreciate your curiosity and thoughtfulness about the world we inhabit. 

I still think we had better focus on the big changes that must be made for the survival of our planet. We are running out of our natural resources and are still spewing poisons into the air and water. There are those who expect Obama and his administration to turn back time and ‘fix’ it, but the system doesn’t need ‘fixing’ it needs radical changes. 

Am not sure about the football analogy, there are historically weird formalities in warfare which I don’t  ’get’  but I will think about this some more. thanks for this column.

By macwoof woof on 07/15/2009 6:19 pm
Mugsy Peabody
The insane ranting of uninformed people who either can’t or don’t think and scream at those who don’t put up with their bs is a waste of time, which is pretty much why I stopped bothering with wOw.  Margo, you rock.  Thanks for your thoughts.  Mugsy.
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/25/2009 9:46 pm