Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Meg Whitman - Demystified | 03/30/2009 9:30 am

Meg Whitman's Top Aides Tell All

Campaign spokesperson Mitch Zak and Women’s Coalition Chair Jillian Manus spoke about Whitman’s gubernatorial leap, stance on Prop 8 and eating habits.
By Randi Bernfeld
© AP

On March 11, 2008, wOw co-founder Lesley Stahl interviewed Meg Whitman, who was, at the time, preparing to retire as eBay’s CEO. She had also just helped Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign raise $70 million, so clearly Whitman had at least some interest in the wild world of American politics. When Stahl prodded Whitman on her rumored plans to run for California governor, Whitman remained vague.

"You know, I’m interested in the environment, interested in education," the 52-year-old explained to Stahl. "So I think those are the things I am more interested in at the moment than elective politics." Three days later, Whitman would join John McCain’s campaign as the Republican’s national campaign adviser. That must have been a positive experience, because less than a year after the Stahl interview — and playing coy about her ambitions — Whitman officially threw her hat into the political ring when, on February 9, 2009, she announced her interest in running in California’s 2010 gubernatorial race.

Whitman’s announcement comes at a time when the Golden State appears anything but golden. California’s unemployment rate jumped 10.1 percent, according to figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics released in January 2009. The number of people without jobs in California soared to more than 1.8 million, up almost 700,000 since Stahl spoke to Whitman.

Also in the last year, the unemployment rate for men rose faster than that for women, which means a woman’s role in the workplace will continue to evolve over the next few years. No wonder Whitman is making women a top priority in her campaign — by creating a Women’s Coalition, which encourages women to work together to sustain California’s struggling economy.

I recently spoke to that coalition’s leader, Jillian Manus, a leading Republican activist and the president of literary agency Manus and Associates. During this conversation, Manus explained why Whitman’s business career translates well into politics, she sheds light on the potential lawmaker’s personality and expands on how Whitman plans on enlisting – and deploying – members of the Women’s Coalition. Also, Whitman spokesperson Mitch Zak sheds light on what Whitman calls the "Campaign Diet" and why his candidate opposes gay marriage, but supports civil unions.

Randi Bernfeld: Hello, Jillian! Thanks for speaking with us. Now, let’s cut to the chase: Do you think women are going to vote for Meg Whitman because she’s a woman?

Jillian: Most people and most women – I know you are the same – do not want other women to support a person just because they are a woman. We want women to get behind us because we’re the right leader, the right CEO, the right candidate. But the fact that she’s a woman really does add another layer. And judging from your website, I know you get it.

Randi: Of course we get it: Women can change the world — one person at a time. Now Whitman hopes to change California in a big way. Her goals include improving public schools, supporting green technologies and creating two million new jobs by 2015. Can she do this?

Jillian: Look, Meg didn’t just roll out a platform and say, "I’m going to announce my candidacy when I know I can win." Instead, she said, "I’m going to announce my candidacy when I know I can govern." That’s how Meg thinks. She really researches every point. She really does her homework. She looks, she listens and she prioritizes everything — but she realizes she’s not going to create change alone. She understands the personality of entrepreneurship. And so if there’s anything that’s going to stimulate this market, it’s us. She calls it "The Power of Many." I love that.

Randi: "The Power of Many"?

17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

fp1

I see they haven’t told of her and of Chinese laborers working for her for 13-15 hrs a day for a pittance when she was CEO of StrideRight—or of the reporter who went with her to the plant in China and saw young kids putting glue on insoles with bare hands and who reported how the atmosphere was nearly unbreathable due to little or no ventilation. Same thing for her stewardship of Keds. And why was a Vietnamese woman put up for sale on E-Bay for 3 days under her stewardship wtihout anyone finding out about it? Ms Whitman, you may have a gazillion bucks but you need to answer some questions. These are legitimate questions you need to answer Ms Whitman.

Here’s a quote:

"Prior to eBay, Meg was the General Manager of Hasbro Inc.’s Preschool Division. In this position, Meg was responsible for global management and marketing…"

Young workers in China who make holiday toys for Disney, Hasbro and RC2… report that their bodies are often covered with red welts from the bug bites, which can easily become infected if the wounds are scratched… Workers are at the factory 93 hours a week, toiling 13 and a half-hour shifts, seven days a week…

 

— National Labor Committee Report

And another:

Sixteen-year-olds put toxic glue onto Keds sneakers with their bare hands. When we visited the factory in July 1999, they were producing Keds sneakers for Stride Rite… When you went through the adhesive department where they worked your eyes stung from the strong chemical vapors. There was no special ventilation, nor were gloves or masks provided to the workers. The company general manager said they came to China "for the cheap labor" and "to get away from the unions in South Korea." According to the company the average wage was 42 cents an hour.

 

— Another National Labor Committee Report 

By fp1 on 03/30/2009 9:44 am
fp1
BTW the reporter who accompanied Ms Whitman on her Asian trip is Chris Kelly.
By fp1 on 03/30/2009 10:05 am
RudiG

And you gotta love her nuanced position on gay marriage, which boils down to semantics:

"She voted for Proposition 8, and to her that was a matter of her faith and her personal convictions. She does believe the term "marriage" should belong to the union of a man and a woman. But that said, she is absolutely a strong supporter of civil unions and it’s evident by her leadership at eBay. It was tremendously inclusive in that regard."

And Whitman’s "faith?" She’s a Presbyterian! When I told a friend who is a Presbyterian minister in a large Southern city with a large Presbyterian population she was claming Presbyertianism as her rationale for opposing gay marriage, he howled with laughter.

Whitman has a major obstacle in California: She is a Republican. The party is down to its lowest registration in history: 31 percent. Young voters are staying away in droves. In December, California GOP strategist Tony Quinn summed up the state of his party: "The California Republican Party is dead. Call the undertaker, haul away the corpse." 

And:

California Republicans are at the lowest point in the history of the state. And they will go lower, as elderly white voters pass on. Sometime in the next decade, [independent] registrants will pass Republicans.

Maybe the GOP will come to its senses, but it is very unlikely. Republicans hold not a single district other than those gerrymandered for them in the 2001 redistricting, and the gerrymander will disappear in 2011, thanks to Proposition 11. Perhaps return to an open primary would allow Republicans to nominate candidates who can still win outside gerrymandered districts. But count on the myopic state GOP leadership to fight to keep the primary closed so they can control a dying party of geriatric voters.

Whitman’s stance on gay marriage is political, not principled. Her problem is this: She cannot win the general election without attracting 20 - 30 percent of independent and Democratic voters (at least), but  independent voter can’t vote in the GOP primary, so to get to the general, she has to win a majority of the 31 percent of hard-core (read: "anti-gay, anti-choice") right wing Republicans.

Whitman is also pro-choice, a fact that will also hurt her with the GOP base and makes her and fellow liberal Republican Steve Poizner vulnerable to a hard-right candidate like Reps. Dan Lungren or Tom McClintock, who would then have not a snowball’s chance in the general.

Whitman and Poizner know that they’re running the risk of replaying the campaign of the last liberal Republican who ran for governor, former LA Mayor Richard Riordan.In that campaign, Democrats ran ads detailing Riordan’s pro-choice record during the Republican Primary, which caused the GOP base to vote decidely for a right-wing extremist who was easily trounced by the Democratic candidate in the general. 

By RudiG on 03/30/2009 10:49 am
fp1
Excellent post Rudi!
By fp1 on 03/30/2009 10:53 am
SlinkyBinx

Rudi G—another amazing post! 

 I don’t mind crossing party lines to vote for the best candidate, but her stance on Prop 8 means that I won’t be crossing the lines to vote for her.  I will never cast a vote for someone who thinks its okay to discriminate against gay people, period. 

 

By SlinkyBinx on 03/30/2009 12:14 pm
BellaMia

Why would she want to sink herself into the California cesspool? 

California, my home state, has skyrocketing taxes, skyrocketing welfare dockets, and businesses fleeing the state, along with the most productive people.  We personally know 8 couples who have left the state after their employer moved or they got sick of the traffic, and taxes.

My husband was staying with a friend in Santa Monica last week.  At 2am he heard fire from an AK-47 from the direction of the public golf course.  His host reassurred him that it happens almost every night, and the cops don’t even bother to come out anymore it’s so prevalent.   

The state has gone the way of DC, Detroit, Philly, and NYC in the 70’s: dangerous, over-taxed, hostile to business, with dirty failing schools. 

Actually Rudy was able to turn NYC around, but I think California is hopeless because too many people want the government to be Santa Claus. 

By BellaMia on 03/30/2009 12:49 pm
Bonnie Oliver

On April 1st the sales tax in California will increase.  In my county, the sales tax will reach almost 10%.  The unemployment rate for the State is now at 10.2% and still rising.  The State income tax has risen as part of the deal to balance the 2009/10 fiscal budget.  All State offices are asked to reduce their budgets…..no exceptions, again part of the budgetary deal.

Can the State turn itself around?  Not without the help of business.  This is still a very attractive State for businesses but the move to place more of the burden for paying for State government on the business community is having a negative effect.  Businesses are leaving California and that is a sure sign of weakness.  Is it a mass exodus?  Not yet.

Meg Whitman will very probably win the gubernatorial race.  One of her opponents will be San Francisco Mayor, Gavin Newsom.  However, nothing is going to improve in California until the Legislature is taken away from the Democratic party.  They can spend money as fast as any teenager and having spent all the money in California, they are now looking at the federal treasury.  These politicians have to be voted out of office.  I only hope Meg Whitman will not be a stand alone candidate and that her election will have whatever is the female equivalent of "coat-tails".

By Bonnie Oliver on 03/30/2009 2:26 pm
RudiG

But first she has to convince a majority of the state’s 31 percent of voters who are registered Republican to vote for her, even though she is 1) pro-choice, 2) pro civil unions for gays and 3) a woman — and not for the other liberal Republican, Steve Poizner, who is 1) pro-choice, 2) pro gay marriage and 3) a man. (He’s also currently the insurance commissioner.) If these two split the vote of the GOP’s tiny "moderate" wing, it opens the door for a hard right-winger like Lungren or McClintock (or that numbskull Darrell Issa) to walk away with the primary win.

It’s more likely Jerry Brown will be the Dem than Newsome. There’s talk that Feinstein might step in. She would win in a rout.

The mistake Whitman made was choosing to run as a Republican in a state where less than a third of the voters are registered GOP. That was colossal bad judgment. 

By RudiG on 03/30/2009 2:53 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Nope.  She will win.
By Bonnie Oliver on 03/30/2009 3:44 pm
christyjuarez
yes she will win!
By christyjuarez on 03/30/2009 9:47 pm
HelenNajar
My impression of Meg is that she is a woman of principle, so she would be running for Governor based on her confidence that she can do what others before have failed to do - bring people together to work for something other than themselves. I am very impressed with her refreshing, optomistic and enthusiastic personna. She has mastered the team approach and maybe, just maybe she can succeed as she seems to have been successful with most everything she has wanted to do. Most of all I feel she is running for Governor because she really does love this state and wants to restore California to its former status as the best in the nation.
By HelenNajar on 03/30/2009 6:33 pm
nanchanu

Jerry Brown???? Been there, done THAT

In the words of the Dead Kennedies, "there’s the Governor Jerry Brown, always smiles and never frowns… California uber Alles!"

Feinstein won’t step in: it’s a step down for her to go into a gubernatorial position given her senority. I agree with Newsome as a more likely Dem candidate, or possibly Sean Penn will toss his stocking cap into the arena?

In any event, Meg has as good a chance as any, except for… Jerry Brown.  (but thanks for a great laugh and a replay of the Dead Kennedies on my iPod!)

By nanchanu on 03/31/2009 7:33 pm
ChromeToe
anyones got to be better than Schwarznegger. I just saw a clip of him comparing some legislation he’s supporting or signing to one of his movies. i’ve seen several clips of him doing that over the years and it’s just soooo…. pathetic. no other word for it. there’s just something about that man that so does NOT inspire any feelings of good leadership.
By ChromeToe on 03/30/2009 7:40 pm
christyjuarez
I will support meg Whitman 100%. I have a lot to say , just found this site, but have to be at work by 5am so I must get ready for bed. I now have hope for y home state, I was born here, in Truckee Calif. but the rich enviromentalists have ruined my home town and my state. I am all for living green but not closing up my forests that I have played in and loved in all my life. I am tired of paying for all of these lazy welfare recipiants who just do not want to work. Taxes, oh myyyy the taxes. enough already! Now Obama is going to allow a bill that will make it illegal to have a vegtable garden?! come on. I know he wants to rule the world, but not on my watch. oh god night.
By christyjuarez on 03/30/2009 9:42 pm
christyjuarez
p.s. the poppies are a representation of my faith in Meg Whitman. I know that she and her campaign will be using the California poppy as their symbol of hope and new growth in California.
By christyjuarez on 03/30/2009 9:45 pm